I'm reuploading this to add info to it. I have already shared with on Comment on Drawn Characters but I want to make another article on this topic. Because Time to time I reminded People to think drawn characters have an actual age, can be classified as child porn. The Supreme Court of the United States of America has already ruled that drawn characters can't be said to have any actual age because they are fictional. as such, they can't be classified as child porn. What's more, some adults look underage. Since making this someone posted this comment: Is there any proof that the supreme court did pass the law?.
I'm asking you could call this proof around the Supreme Court over this info: The legal treatment of simulated child pornography in the United States requires an understanding of the components of that phrase: pornography, child, and simulated. United States law treats these as separate concepts.
In the United States, pornography is considered a form of personal expression, and thus governed by the First Amendment to the Constitution. Pornography is generally protected speech, unless it is obscene, as the Supreme Court of the United States held in 1973 in Miller v. California.
In 2002, the United States Supreme Court ruled in Ashcroft v. Free Speech Coalition that the Child Pornography Prevention Act of 1996 (CPPA) was facially invalid in prohibiting virtual or cartoon child pornography. The basis for the ruling was that the CPPA made unlawful some forms of protected First Amendment speech, banning depictions of sex between children even if not obscene and not involving real child victims. Under New York v. Ferber, if the depiction is of real child abuse or a real child victim, as a result of photographing a live performance, for instance, then it is not protected speech. Under Miller v. California, obscene speech is likewise excluded from First Amendment protection. The CPPA made all virtual child sex depictions illegal without regard to whether the speech was protected or not, so that part of the statute was struck down as facially invalid.