Deviation Actions

wwwarea's avatar

The Right to Self Defence - The Truth?

Can someone please flag this slander and cyberbullying content on Youtube?…
I flagged it as bullying, and explained that slander is illegal.
These guys do not know what bullying, wolfaboo, etc. is.
EDIT IN UPDATE (7/17/2015 - night): The video is gone.

ALSO, when I add the 'NEW:' parts, please note that each one will be after a certain amount of people adding this to favorites. Just to avoid another misunderstanding. Need to be safe. This includes this update here. Edit: I edited the update on 7/16/2015 and will add this:
The 'NEW' list will have dates by them, some may not be very clear though.

May I suggest looking at this too?…
Some parts sound very similar to what happened to me.

OK, I know this section is about me, but if anyone keeps listening to there offensive crap, slander, etc. I want you to hear me out.
First of all, I have the RIGHT to defend myself, and defending yourself and/or bringing out rude things of other people is NOT bullying, nor is it "attacking".
Second, before anyone thinks, I suggest looking here:
General Message About the Past 3 Months - UPDATE 3

≈═■▪■═╣Myths and Facts About Me╠═■▪■═≈

NEW: "You created this drama yourself" (7/16/2015)
No. Did I choose to make that video about me, choose to make that article, choose to make so much bigoted, untrue and slander about me, etc?
No I didn't. Those sick people are trying to blame the victim again, in a "You made me do this too you!" fashion.

"You're a bully/cyberbully."
Now how am I a bully?
I been called a "bully" for standing up for myself, and standing up for others. I also been called one for simply bringing out there rude behavior over people not them.
I brought a person out for trying to humiliate others for having a 'fetish' over random things. But that's called constructive criticism, and for defending purposes
I been attacked and humiliated for having a different opinion about imaginary things.
I do not (or at least try a lot to not):
  • Make ED articles over random individuals
  • Mock, shame, etc. people for any part of their sexuality (This counts to 'fetishes' too)
  • Tell people what to think about themselves just because I said so
  • Bash furries
  • Slut-shame
  • Upload things like this, this, this, or even this for example. (btw, at least one of those contain defamatory.)
  • Mock, defame, humilate, expose secrets, insult, or some others about individuals publicly (All is not a requirement) for what they do, what they like, etc.
  • Depend on the majority about other people in a negative way
  • Force my personal opinions about a movie on others
  • More

"You're a wolfaboo!"
Now while Humanaboo is the mirror side of Wolfaboo, I apparently did defend 'Wolfaboo' at least until I heard that 'Wolfaboo' is meant to be about speciesism (just like Humanaboo), and that you must be OVER-obsessed with wolves and other requirements.

Though some say it's about treating wolves as equal (WTF?! Why is that "bad"?)?, but heard it's really about treating wolves as superior. I'm NOT so sure about this one: Official Wolfaboo Definition
Though, this does have some superior claim and of course, OVER-obsessed things. Like simply being 'obsessed' =/= wolfaboo. It's much more. Even Bean said something like that to me (Correct me if wrong of course).

Besides, me falling in love with 'imaginary' anthropomorphic talking wolves from a 'wolf movie' and personality like them as 'Gods' it's self, doesn't make me a wolfaboo.
I even acknowledge that RL wolves here is very different maybe. Though I DO believe that yes, not all wolves are dangerous (And I think it's stereotype to say they are too, just as much as the opposite) and they CAN learn from humans, and may have 'secret spirits' like you know, that cool 'animal spiritually' thing?
btw, I know a bully who denies news (which reports actual science research too) and continue to cause more bigoted views.

"You attack people who don't like this Alpha and Omega movie!"
Now when the flying f*** did I actually ATTACK anyone for not liking this movie? Oh wait, because I wanted to disagree with some reviewers? Because I wanted to simply argue them, and give my opinion back? Since when is giving actual disagreement an "attack"? And considering, I am allowed to do that, especially to unfair criticism.
"But you attacked an anti-Alpha-and-Omega group!"
Well maybe it's because the group allowed to give an opinion on it? And that it was more of a 'disapproval' opinion and criticism? And considering the one who made the group went to actual fan groups and attacked them, and forcing the hatred opinion on others who liked it? And tried to get people who were not forcing anyone 'there thing' to read that hate message about fans, while fans on the other hand, DON'T make others like it. Or for that one harmless side.

I'll admit, I might of reacted a bit 'too much' about that group, like when I said 'Go boycott it' during an upload or something. I think I deleted that. But remember, the guy who made the group pretty much was not behaving about it either. And called all fans 'autistic wolfaboos', yes, an offensive anti-disability message and offensive directly to fans. While at least some fans didn't do that to those who simply disliked it.
And besides, during that time and outside of the time, I never once MADE ANYONE actually LIKE it. I was completely fine for those who disliked it I think, but there is a difference of 'disliking' vs 'going out and acting on that'. And take a guess of what I was focusing on. Go on, take a guess...

"You are a bad person for defending furries and fetishes!"
How am I a bad person for defending Freedom of Expression?
Simply being a furry and/or having a 'fetish' as one or not, doesn't hurt anyone, but trying to shame people for being either one (or both) does hurt, and according to a lot of psychology research, 'Emotional Abuse' is linked to 'actual pain'.
I'm sorry, but if people are allowed to talk crap about people with a harmless 'fetish', then I'm sure those people are allowed to talk bad about you back, or stand up for themselves. (or both).
Note: The only reason why they call them "sick" is because it's not their fetish, and that maybe they depend on the majority, which btw, is all just biases, which is clearly no different than a anti-gay/hetero person going out and calling 'Homosexuality and Heterosexual' sick.
I see no different as they are both based off the same 'personality'.
If having (for example) a 'furry fatty' fetish is disgusting, then it's clearly fair for me to say that "Two humans kissing is far worse than scat" then. They are both valid as they are all based off personality traits then. And no, 'popularity' =/= good argument. Who said it is?

"But you defend ALL fetishes, and that includes pedophile!"
Let's preach again: Having a fetish is fine, as long if you don't go out and bloody hurt ANYONE. And that includes the so-called 'common' stuff.
The only pedophiles I would defend are: Those who don't go out and hurt, and/or those who regret. And I accept based off some criticism out there that arresting someone for doing something completely 'fictional' is f***ed up. Because nobody should be arrested for something so bloody victimless! It's wrong! It's just arresting someone for only thought-crime.
Seriously, and hell, I'm not the only one who has this idea as a careful thinker. (Well sometimes I'm not careful on everything)

"Fetishes are risky, so therefor, it's bad to have any one; bad to defend it"
In the common heterosexual and homosexual world, there is so much more rape reports than those having a 'foot fetish', I'm sure.
But I'm sure it's about control in all. If I had to blame something you can control, then you might as well ban kids (so they don't get raped), ban traffic to avoid accidencts, ban ALL sexualities including Homosexuality and Heterosexuality, etc.

"You're not perfect"
That's obvious due to some actual mistakes, but neither are you. (Yes, this myth is true)

"Defending fetishes, recolors, etc. violate my speech"
Now how on earth does using Freedom of Speech to defend something you hate violate yours? Are you bloody serious?!

"You're a bigot!"
For trying my best to argue? If that's true anyway, then everybody is a bigot!

"You're obese because your diabetic!"
I found this in a so-called "fact" list on that non-joke page about me. Apparently the OP creates the stereotype that all diabetics are 'fat'.
I am Type 1. Type 1 doesn't have a known cause, and this can happen to even skinny people. Though because of Type 1, I do suffer some weight issues now. But I'm still not what you think an obese person looks like...

"You're Selfish, Egoist, and 'Self-Centered'"
More bullcrap about me.
I don't really understand why someone thinks I'm those things for defending myself, disagreeing with people, and defending my friends.
"Yeah, I'm a really horrible person for doing that." *sarcasm*

"You don't back up any arguments!"
Umm, remember the time I linked to news side that actually had USEFUL information, news of actual science reports, definitions, etc?

"You are just like yourself on Fanpop"
Perhaps I cannot change my fights for Freedom and such.
But I never went back on there and did the same thing. The only thing I defend is idea of bypassing your ban just for the sake of your life, but only at the same time, regretting what you did and trying to start over yourself, even though Fanpop doesn't like ban evaders. But morally, I find nothing wrong with that.
As for here, I am allowed to make journals and stand up for myself, to avoid bullcrap about me, etc. It's within my rights, I have the Free Speech to speak up for myself, and etc.
For doing that, I am considered the "same person". Wow.

"You're delusional!"
How am I delusional? Anyone who said that to me, just wants to say it because they can't stand it when someone makes a good point about them.
Considering too, I was also called "delusional" for believing in the right to suicide.

NEW: "You support bestiality because you define four legged creatures as anthropomorphic!"  (Somewhere between 7/16/2015 and 7/14/2015 I think)
K, first of all, there actually is evidence of consent after doing research as a person who questions taboos, (and apparently the other way around is real, should that guy really be considered a rapist?)
But apparently, bestiality is actually a means to a creature who is 100% NOT human. If a four legged creature happens to talk, (especially show other human characteristics), then guess what? It doesn't count as bestiality. The feel and relationship seems to lean toward a creature who's really more different than a "dumb" animal (RL non-human animals) that has the same feelings as a human or beyond. Regardless of that, if they can talk like a human, then that should obviously be accepted by consent.
It does NOT MATTER if they 'Look' like a very different shape, what matters is the consent, and that's it. Otherwise, why the fuck should you judge an 'intelligent' looking creature that crosses species? It's still just a "human" inside of another shape's body. Just like walking dogs.
AND CONSIDERING, a walking anthropomorphic has 'parts' of an animal while this is kinda the same thing.

NEW: "__________John was right about wwwarea" (7/17/2015 - night)
He could never figure out how to make his claim "right".
Please don't ever listen to him (And I have the right to say that as he is involving me/my business)., he also accepted slanderous things about me, including a murder desire slander (Truth, I do not want to), made horrid harassing encouragement comments about me:…, (May report in ticket soon), and the fact that he keeps pretending his opinion is "right" over me, and etc.
He cannot argue, but he keeps dictating people about me just because, he thinks his opinion is "fact" over me when it can be argued that it's not, but he refuse to accept any debating; so in all, he's bigoted; look up "bigoted meaning" on Google.
He thinks I'm a "bad person" for making stamps, standing up against rude behavior against me (Standing up for myself), pretends I'm the same person from 'Fanpop', etc, etc. And his only possible argument is "Because he depends on 'who' and 'why'; he doesn't like it when I give my word.

BTW, if he says anything about me, then I am allowed to say anything about him back.

And sorry but I had to post this.

NEW: "I want to kill humans" (7/17/2015 - night)
Now when the hell did I say that? Because I am a misanthropic? Being a misanthropic =/= want to kill.

NEW: "You're not a victim" (7/17/2015 - night)
I didn't start it with the ED article, the video, etc. And sure, I made a mistake about the death thing, but I'm still one as I'm not the one who upload journals, articles, snapshots, etc, etc. about others in negative opinion ways.
EXAMPLE: I am a victim in THIS.

NEW: "You're a loony for what you believe in!" (9/13/2015 - night)
Apparently I been considered a "loony" by horrible people online (Including those who promote cyberbullying articles that advocate harassment, stalking, bigotry, etc).
All because I was being more open minded and more of a possible free thinker in spirituality, science, and maybe religion (sort of? idk).
Anyway, since when is it "loony" for having beliefs based off evidence, spiritual possibilities, and maybe more? It's natural and normal to reach this far out, and it's not delusional to be open minded by having faith based off evidence.
Clearly nobody clearly knows (maybe) about the spiritual world, souls, etc. Anyone callings someone "loony" for having "new" ideas makes that 'someone' who claims that, a huge selfish rabid brat as he/she are claiming he/she know everything about it when he/she doesn't and considering the way this spirituality free thinking goes, is no different than how other spiritual theories get formed. - Something almost off: We have the traditional way of meditating, but new ideas came and suggest that you can meditate by laying down in bed.

2/24/2017 I had to remove this part.

NEW: "You're a wolfaboo and a bad person involving Bobsheaux!" (4/24/2018)
Because no one on the other part of the deal other than me and Another-Realm has removed their stuff mentioning me and anyone else on the side, and because some people are still reading messages mentioning me and some people have this sense of believing I'm some "bad" person, this message deserves to be here.
I didn't do anything wrong other than anything that might of been a mistake involving him. I have simply disagreed with many of his points, and made journals thinking he was an open minded person and called out anything stifling creativity, and I also called him out for spreading FALSE information about me, and has merely made more stamps simply having my own opinions in general about how many critics can stifle creativity. I am allowed to do that.
But Bobsheaux made many mistakes:
Bobsheaux has libeled me so many times.
Took something out of proportion (journal explaining why he was a cyberbully, hid the part where it explained why, then it made people think I called him that because of reviews maybe).
Supported personal attacks.
May have supported suicide aiding to some people.
Stole art and put a random story that wasn't the intention of the art.
Claims he doesn't stifle creativity but actually does according to many comments for example.
Violated the no drama deal several times.
Violated what may have been a no cyberbullying rule on DeviantArt.
Starts more drama with me.
And maybe more.

UPDATE 9/22/2018

Going back to the argument that involves "bestiality", I also believe some of those that can't talk can still give consent by other forms of clear messages (e.g. thinking like a human or close and carefully signing consent forms of marriage I guess). Sorry for the message being slightly off now... UPDATE DONE

Anyway, I been attacked for providing multiverse evidence, spiritual world evidence, and wonders, etc. by people who depend on popular belief, other bigotry, etc.
Please don't ever depend on those people.


And of course, there is more other things about me that's wrong. And of course, I am allowed to handle this, as this is my business.

Please also note, that I have made some mistakes on DA too, so don't expect me to be perfect.

I want to warn anyone who sees anyone talk about me.
They will twist up many meanings, etc. about me. Try to show you snapshots of behavior that aren't even bad (Despite a couple of possible mistakes I've done), but tries to effect your emotions on trying to make it look "bad", etc.
They will try to say that I'm "wrong", "bad", etc. just because I am 'whining' about this, even though I have the right to, and since that doesn't debunk anything, etc.
Be warned, they will also say things about me in a 'just because' form; meaning they will say call me "delusional" without any good links, comparisons, etc.

They may also defend their bullying content as "critique" which clearly makes no sense at all. Critique isn't: Mocking, defame, and.. you know the others.


In the end, here, I have the RIGHT to be concern about my own social life, and I have the right to be VERY concern, no matter how "crazy" it seems the trolls, cyberbullies, etc.
Please understand anyone that I am just worried about myself, people seeing garbage about me, my personal likes, etc.
This is my life to worry about, and I have a reason to protect it.

And honestly, this crap about me was making me very upset, very depressed, etc.

I may also add more stuff too here.


Stamp Template -…
I have a feeling I forgot which template it was. Oh well, I didn't make the template part for sure.
I think this one might of been edited. Not sure if I have the correct credit..
Image details
Image size
99x56px 162.66 KB
© 2015 - 2022 wwwarea
Join the community to add your comment. Already a deviant? Log In
Martinthelitten40's avatar
In my School a lot of people hate me just because i defend myself everytime someone bullies me, they hate me for that because i don't shut up (The more than the half of my classmates in my school are bossy and hate everyone who don't follow their orders, and so they hate me because i don't want to follow their order of shutting up, i don't do so because i don't like when i get bossed around by people that shouldn't boss me around.)