Deviation Actions

William-Black's avatar

Nuclear OTV Commercial Transport Diagram

Published:
37 Comments
44K Views
Full Resolution Digital Print: $12.00
Orders can be placed at wblack42@sbcglobal.net
See my profile page for details.

Light Freighter for intraorbital service between space colonies and industrial platforms, designed for the System States Era of my Orion’s Arm future history setting.

Image featured on Winchell Chung’s Atomic Rockets site, Realistic Designs page, Link: Nuclear OTV Commercial Transport Diagram.

In the System States Era asteroid mining operations thrive throughout the asteroid belt and among the moons of Jupiter and Saturn the Martian terraforming program has left legacy: a sprawling archipelago of island stations and industrialized moons, Bernal Sphere's and O'Neill Cylinders, Spindle and Wheel cities, and a population of humanity growing into the millions. Space colonies are independent city-states and trade is their lifeblood. Entire generations are born and live their lives in spinning cylinders, bubbles, and torus shaped habitats, harvesting, mining, and fabricating all they need from the environment of the outer solar system.

Orion and Medusa style nuclear pulse freighters haul payloads of raw materials across interplanetary distances, while nuclear orbital transfer vehicles (OTV’s) provide light freight and passenger service between space habitats in Jupiter and Saturn orbit.

For a table of Delta V required for travel using Hohmann orbits among the moons of Saturn see
Why Saturn on Winchell Chung’s Atomic Rockets site. Scroll a little further down the page and you will find a Synodic Periods and Transit Times for Hohmann Travel table for Moons of Saturn.

Nuclear propulsion Systems: Operational Constraints

The abundance of various chemical ices for use as reaction mass among the moons of the outer system gas giants makes NERVA an excellent option for commercial application. Nuclear thermal rockets provide excellent efficiency; they also impose certain operational restrictions. The engine emits significant levels of radiation while firing and even after shut-down, and while passengers and crew are protected by the engines shadow-shield and hydrogen tanks, you wouldn’t want to point the engine at other spacecraft or space platforms. During the U.S. nuclear thermal rocket engine development program NFSD contractors had recommended that no piloted spacecraft approach to within 100 miles behind or to the sides of an operating NERVA I engine. The only safe approach to a spacecraft with a NERVA engine is through the conical “safe-zone” within the radiation shadow created by its shadow-shield and hydrogen tanks. Docking NERVA propelled spacecraft to a space station or habitat is problematic because structures protruding outside the conical safe-zone can reflect radiation back at the spacecraft, irradiating the passengers and crew.  

These facts impose a set of mandatory operational parameters and flight rules for nuclear operation. An exclusion zone for nuclear propulsion (60 kilometers minimum) is imposed around every orbital platform. Orbital Guard units would hold broad discretionary powers—violate an exclusion-zone or disregard traffic-control and the local guard will cheerfully vaporize your spacecraft. No warning shots, no second chances. A crew that violates flight rules doesn’t live long enough to worry about fines or attorney fees, and the public’s time and funds are not wasted with trials of incompetent captains and crew.
 
Nuclear Freighters “park” propulsion modules in station-keeping orbit with their destination, and the freight/passenger module undocks, separating from its nuclear propulsion module, proceeding to birthing under thrust of a chemical maneuvering unit.

Because the nuclear propulsion modules are valuable, and are potentially deadly missiles if mishandled — codes to access the autonomous flight computer and possession of the nuclear propulsion module are temporarily handed over to the local orbital-guard for safe keeping.

For a good example of Space traffic control see the entry on Winchell Chung’s Atomic Rockets site here and scroll down to quote from Manna by Lee Correy.

At this point in my future history, 750 years post Martian colonization, spacecraft are essentially stacks of common modules which can be swapped out to suit application.

Independent Operators, like today’s truckers, might “own” only the CMOD (Command Module) with other units being leased per flight.  The Freight Carrying Structural Spine, essentially a rigid frame with mountings for cargo modules, might be leased by the shipper and loaded with cargo (but owned by a separate freight transport supplier) and since different payloads mass differently it might be the responsibility of the shipper to lease suitable nuclear and chemical propulsion modules rated to the task. Passenger transport services might likewise lease passenger modules of varying capacity and Transport Brokerage firms  would coordinate freight and passenger payloads assigned to same destinations and offer these in an open-bid market.    

Propulsion Modules
 
Different payload masses require different propulsion module configurations, the light freighter detailed here requires only a single Solid-Core nuclear thermal rocket. A heavy payload freighter might use clusters of solid-core, or Open-Cycle Gas-Core, nuclear thermal rockets.

A timeline for my future history is to be found here: Timeline

Design

3D models are my own conception based on various real-world proposals.

As research for the passenger/crew module I studied the POTV (Personnel Orbital Transfer Vehicle) pages 86-96 from NASA Technical Memorandum 58238 Satellite Power System: Concept Development and Evaluation Program Volume VI1 -Space Transportation available: here.

Propulsion for my light freighter is a Solid-Core NERVA Derivative, details available here.

In conversation Winchell Chung suggested the modification Cascade-Vanes: details available here.

Related Image: Nuclear OTV Commercial Transport

 

Image details
Image size
4000x4500px 4.73 MB
© 2014 - 2021 William-Black
Comments37
Join the community to add your comment. Already a deviant? Log In
cotinswabin's avatar

btw is it alright i can add this to my group?

Trekkie148's avatar
Cool design!
JESzasz's avatar
 Every time that I look at one of these modular spaceship designs, I can't help but muse that they don't look as pretty as a spaceplane, but I know that the reality that the first of the spaceships that get us to Mars, and perhaps even (and most likely) beyond our star system will look like this. Until we become advanced enough, our starship's designs will most certainly be decided by their function, not by aesthetics.

 Of course, whatever gets us into space will be beautiful in it's own right. Maybe not by looks, but most certainly by making them able to do the things they need to do, and whatever works best to get the crew safely to their destination and back is sexy in it's own right.

 Interesting, using cowling to direct thrust for maneuvering.
William-Black's avatar

The physical forces which constrain earthbound transportation create a set of aesthetic expectations, which is understandable, we expect things that go fast to be streamlined, yet even aircraft and high performance race cars are governed by practical necessity.

 

Spacecraft design is governed by the Tsiolkovsky rocket equation. Every gram counts.
JESzasz's avatar
Yeah, I know. Every gram saved by saving on weight means being able to save a little more fuel to get you to where you're going.
 
 
LordOmegaZ's avatar
also i read that nuclear engines don't need their own radiators due to them shooting out the heated thrust IS their radiator in a sense?
William-Black's avatar
Yes, exactly. Reactor heat is dumped into the thrust stream and is carried away out the engine nozzle. Here is a general diagram of nuclear rocket engine cycles, and the material in this PDF gives a good description of the design. Pages 6 and 7 detail propellant flow path and engine cycles.
LordOmegaZ's avatar
so its like a atomic afterburner?

lol i think im thinking that wrong


also im designing a rough concept called a "dyson island" or "solarscraper*
William-Black's avatar
Um. no, not an afterburner at all. In fact the hydrogen doesn't ignite in a NERVA. The reactor merely rapidly heats the liquid hydrogen up to around 40,000 degrees and blasts it out the expansion nozzle. 
LordOmegaZ's avatar
ok, sorry ._.
William-Black's avatar
Hey no need to apologize, asking questions, that's how you learn.
LordOmegaZ's avatar
true .w.'

i just tested a large Medusa nuclear drive ship today, after a 14 YEAR trip really far out to a fan-made kerbal planet called Sarin that's basically a blue super jupiter.

so awesome to fly one of these craft.
LordOmegaZ's avatar
i get that LH means liquid hydrogen but whats the 2 mean? :?
William-Black's avatar
H2 is the Chemical formula for hydrogen, and yes, the "L" stands for liquid.
Robbie-Yarber's avatar
Your spacecraft designs are some of the best I have seen. So much better than all of the unrealistic scientifically inaccurate ones that flood the internet.
CaveGrue's avatar
WOW.  THe attention to detail and research behind this is GREAT.
It's always nice to see more realistic, hard SF designs, but the extra mile you went to elevates this in my mind.
Will-Erwin's avatar
This reminds me of the spaceship in Civilization. The concept is great, and based on actual real-life physics (kudos!), and you really bring it to life with this render. I salute you, sir.
Kasterborous's avatar
Really great design. The influences of the Atomic Rockets website are clear, which given that it is surely the authority on speculative scientifically accurate spacecraft is no bad thing.
William-Black's avatar
Thanks,

Winchell Chung’s Atomic Rockets site is the place to go for any author or artist interested in creating a realistic Hard SF setting. There simply is no other site anywhere on the web that lays out the hard science, along with the hard math, and describes not just how a given piece of technology works, but why it works, illustrated with example (along with an amazing collection of fine art) in such a transparent and accessible way.

I cite Winchell's site because I think the genera of SF could benefit from more hard realism, but also because I think the inspiration resulting from more  real-world science in SF is a value in itself.
kuroro8675's avatar
I'm always schocked by your art and reserch I don'0t know if it scifi or a work in progress
William-Black's avatar
Thanks, indeed the spacecraft does represent a technology that falls well within reach of present capabilities - that is to say, there are no elements of its construction that would require invention of an entirely new technology, or even a revolution of existing technology. The nuclear thermal rocket was thoroughly tested in a series of full-up test stand firings and a working production-ready engine was produced more than 40 years ago.

Many years ago Robert A. Heinlein was asked to define science fiction, he described the genre thus: "realistic speculation about possible future events, based solidly on adequate knowledge of the real world, past and present, and on a thorough understanding of the nature and significance of the scientific method."

 

Sadly, today, this description does not apply, and certainly media SF, in nearly every case, falls far short.



My SF ethic is to produce Hard SF, grounded in real science and engineering - far too many SF artists, regardless of the skill and talent they possess, are taken by really bad Hollywood and television SF troupe's, and most of what results, while beautiful to look at, is an absurd fantasy of impossible, and sadly, scientifically illiterate, design.

Media SF (nearly all of Hollywood television SF) does not fall into this category, Media SF, having lost touch with its roots, having lost its core basis in real world science and engineering, falls into a category I define as Romantic-Science-Fantasy – and I for one do not find simple wish fulfillment satisfying.

 

The wonders of the real universe, and the products of plausible science and engineering are infinitely more interesting to my mind, because rather than an empty rationalization, you are talking about how the universe actually works, and the science and technology describe the actual tools we can use to dare great things.   

 

We have barely begun to journey into space, but one day Man will go out there, not just to explore, not just to look but not touch, but to build a better life for Man, because while Earth is a closed system, the resources available in the universe are infinite. We will go with all our imperfections, and with all of our strengths, we will go because we can, and not because we must, and, to quote Freeman Dyson, because life has this remarkable capacity to adapt, it can adapt itself to nearly any condition, and life on this little world doesn’t offer nearly enough challenge.

kuroro8675's avatar
I value your deisre to give hard SF and the strong ground under it. I hope you have a good time and results by your work.
fmilluminati's avatar
This is great, another well thought out, ultra realistic spacecraft from you.  :D

I expect to see some of these tooling around the solar system five decades or so from now.  
Join the community to add your comment. Already a deviant? Log In