Orders can be placed at email@example.com
See my profile page for details.
Light Freighter for intraorbital service between space colonies and industrial platforms, designed for the System States Era of my Orion’s Arm future history setting.
Image featured on Winchell Chung’s Atomic Rockets site, Realistic Designs page, Link: Nuclear OTV Commercial Transport Diagram.
In the System States Era asteroid mining operations thrive throughout the asteroid belt and among the moons of Jupiter and Saturn the Martian terraforming program has left legacy: a sprawling archipelago of island stations and industrialized moons, Bernal Sphere's and O'Neill Cylinders, Spindle and Wheel cities, and a population of humanity growing into the millions. Space colonies are independent city-states and trade is their lifeblood. Entire generations are born and live their lives in spinning cylinders, bubbles, and torus shaped habitats, harvesting, mining, and fabricating all they need from the environment of the outer solar system.
Orion and Medusa style nuclear pulse freighters haul payloads of raw materials across interplanetary distances, while nuclear orbital transfer vehicles (OTV’s) provide light freight and passenger service between space habitats in Jupiter and Saturn orbit.
For a table of Delta V required for travel using Hohmann orbits among the moons of Saturn see
Why Saturn on Winchell Chung’s Atomic Rockets site. Scroll a little further down the page and you will find a Synodic Periods and Transit Times for Hohmann Travel table for Moons of Saturn.
Nuclear propulsion Systems: Operational Constraints
The abundance of various chemical ices for use as reaction mass among the moons of the outer system gas giants makes NERVA an excellent option for commercial application. Nuclear thermal rockets provide excellent efficiency; they also impose certain operational restrictions. The engine emits significant levels of radiation while firing and even after shut-down, and while passengers and crew are protected by the engines shadow-shield and hydrogen tanks, you wouldn’t want to point the engine at other spacecraft or space platforms. During the U.S. nuclear thermal rocket engine development program NFSD contractors had recommended that no piloted spacecraft approach to within 100 miles behind or to the sides of an operating NERVA I engine. The only safe approach to a spacecraft with a NERVA engine is through the conical “safe-zone” within the radiation shadow created by its shadow-shield and hydrogen tanks. Docking NERVA propelled spacecraft to a space station or habitat is problematic because structures protruding outside the conical safe-zone can reflect radiation back at the spacecraft, irradiating the passengers and crew.
These facts impose a set of mandatory operational parameters and flight rules for nuclear operation. An exclusion zone for nuclear propulsion (60 kilometers minimum) is imposed around every orbital platform. Orbital Guard units would hold broad discretionary powers—violate an exclusion-zone or disregard traffic-control and the local guard will cheerfully vaporize your spacecraft. No warning shots, no second chances. A crew that violates flight rules doesn’t live long enough to worry about fines or attorney fees, and the public’s time and funds are not wasted with trials of incompetent captains and crew.
Nuclear Freighters “park” propulsion modules in station-keeping orbit with their destination, and the freight/passenger module undocks, separating from its nuclear propulsion module, proceeding to birthing under thrust of a chemical maneuvering unit.
Because the nuclear propulsion modules are valuable, and are potentially deadly missiles if mishandled — codes to access the autonomous flight computer and possession of the nuclear propulsion module are temporarily handed over to the local orbital-guard for safe keeping.
For a good example of Space traffic control see the entry on Winchell Chung’s Atomic Rockets site here and scroll down to quote from Manna by Lee Correy.
At this point in my future history, 750 years post Martian colonization, spacecraft are essentially stacks of common modules which can be swapped out to suit application.
Independent Operators, like today’s truckers, might “own” only the CMOD (Command Module) with other units being leased per flight. The Freight Carrying Structural Spine, essentially a rigid frame with mountings for cargo modules, might be leased by the shipper and loaded with cargo (but owned by a separate freight transport supplier) and since different payloads mass differently it might be the responsibility of the shipper to lease suitable nuclear and chemical propulsion modules rated to the task. Passenger transport services might likewise lease passenger modules of varying capacity and Transport Brokerage firms would coordinate freight and passenger payloads assigned to same destinations and offer these in an open-bid market.
Different payload masses require different propulsion module configurations, the light freighter detailed here requires only a single Solid-Core nuclear thermal rocket. A heavy payload freighter might use clusters of solid-core, or Open-Cycle Gas-Core, nuclear thermal rockets.
A timeline for my future history is to be found here: Timeline
3D models are my own conception based on various real-world proposals.
As research for the passenger/crew module I studied the POTV (Personnel Orbital Transfer Vehicle) pages 86-96 from NASA Technical Memorandum 58238 Satellite Power System: Concept Development and Evaluation Program Volume VI1 -Space Transportation available: here.
Propulsion for my light freighter is a Solid-Core NERVA Derivative, details available here.
In conversation Winchell Chung suggested the modification Cascade-Vanes: details available here.
Related Image: Nuclear OTV Commercial Transport
Of course, whatever gets us into space will be beautiful in it's own right. Maybe not by looks, but most certainly by making them able to do the things they need to do, and whatever works best to get the crew safely to their destination and back is sexy in it's own right.
Interesting, using cowling to direct thrust for maneuvering.
The physical forces which constrain earthbound transportation create a set of aesthetic expectations, which is understandable, we expect things that go fast to be streamlined, yet even aircraft and high performance race cars are governed by practical necessity.
Spacecraft design is governed by the Tsiolkovsky rocket equation. Every gram counts.
lol i think im thinking that wrong
also im designing a rough concept called a "dyson island" or "solarscraper*
It's always nice to see more realistic, hard SF designs, but the extra mile you went to elevates this in my mind.
Winchell Chung’s Atomic Rockets site is the place to go for any author or artist interested in creating a realistic Hard SF setting. There simply is no other site anywhere on the web that lays out the hard science, along with the hard math, and describes not just how a given piece of technology works, but why it works, illustrated with example (along with an amazing collection of fine art) in such a transparent and accessible way.
I cite Winchell's site because I think the genera of SF could benefit from more hard realism, but also because I think the inspiration resulting from more real-world science in SF is a value in itself.
Many years ago Robert A. Heinlein was asked to define science fiction, he described the genre thus: "realistic speculation about possible future events, based solidly on adequate knowledge of the real world, past and present, and on a thorough understanding of the nature and significance of the scientific method."
Sadly, today, this description does not apply, and certainly media SF, in nearly every case, falls far short.
My SF ethic is to produce Hard SF, grounded in real science and engineering - far too many SF artists, regardless of the skill and talent they possess, are taken by really bad Hollywood and television SF troupe's, and most of what results, while beautiful to look at, is an absurd fantasy of impossible, and sadly, scientifically illiterate, design.
Media SF (nearly all of Hollywood television SF) does not fall into this category, Media SF, having lost touch with its roots, having lost its core basis in real world science and engineering, falls into a category I define as Romantic-Science-Fantasy – and I for one do not find simple wish fulfillment satisfying.
The wonders of the real universe, and the products of plausible science and engineering are infinitely more interesting to my mind, because rather than an empty rationalization, you are talking about how the universe actually works, and the science and technology describe the actual tools we can use to dare great things.
We have barely begun to journey into space, but one day Man will go out there, not just to explore, not just to look but not touch, but to build a better life for Man, because while Earth is a closed system, the resources available in the universe are infinite. We will go with all our imperfections, and with all of our strengths, we will go because we can, and not because we must, and, to quote Freeman Dyson, because life has this remarkable capacity to adapt, it can adapt itself to nearly any condition, and life on this little world doesn’t offer nearly enough challenge.
I expect to see some of these tooling around the solar system five decades or so from now.
Where did you get the idea for a nuclear aerospike plug nozzle engine? I'm quite fascinated by it. The vanes allow a ship to decelerate without pointing retrograde?
edit: woops haha I didn't see the link at the bottom there. Found the page about cascade vanes.
Yes it is human built, no it is not an interplanetary spacecraft, it is an intraorbital transport. Intra-orbit means transport between orbits around a single planet, for example among the moons of Saturn, while inter-planetary means transport between planets.
NERVA is an acronym for Nuclear Engine for Rocket Vehicle Application, a U.S. nuclear thermal rocket engine development program that ran for roughly two decades. NERVA was a joint effort of the U.S. Atomic Energy Commission and NASA.
See my DeviantART post here: : NERVA-II Diagram
Winchell Chung’s Atomic Rockets site post here: Solid Core
Wikipedia entry here: NERVA
My idea is that all the modules are flexible and designed for expansion, beyond a certain scale, depending on payload mass, or accommodating much larger payloads, for example, requires a core module designed for the purpose. I've started models for several types and variations on the design.
Ion shares the same problem as the other electrically powered low-thrust drives. In the words of a NASA engineer the problem is "we can't make an extension cord long enough."
Efficiency (in the context you raise) is not an issue in this context.
Ion drive for this application, in the context of a nuclear OTV operating at Saturn, would not actually make sense for the following reasons:
1. Reaction mass (water-ice which can be broken down to hydrogen and oxygen) is abundant among the moons of Saturn – and in the context of my future history industrial infrastructure and nuclear energy proliferate widely.
With a population rising into the millions, and hundreds of space habitats and industrial platforms in Jupiter and Saturn orbit, the market situation is one where water, oxygen, and hydrogen (produced by large scale ice mining and ubiquitous cracking plants) are literally cheaper than dirt.
2. Commerce is about expediency. Ion thrusters are characteristically low thrust. Efficiency that translates into protracted transit times to move massive payloads relatively short distances is not efficiency worth having.
3. The mass of the hydrogen and oxygen tanks are nothing compared to the mass of a nuclear power plant (or the bank of fuel-cells) necessary to operate an Ion thruster bank of sufficient capacity to propel payload masses at this scale.
Inverse-square law rules out solar as a viable energy source at Saturn. Options in this context are limited to either a nuclear power source or a bank of fuel cells. Don’t forget the added mass of radiator panels, coolant, and miles of plumbing necessary for a nuclear reactor assembly – note: this does not apply to the NERVA – NTR’s dump their waste-heat into their exhaust plume – every ounce added reduces the payload capacity of the spacecraft, which for the freight operations means a loss of profits. A Bi-modal or Tri-modal NTR doesn’t help here either – you have to add the additional mass of the heat-exchanger, pumps, plumbing, and working fluid, along with the radiator.
Absolutely, and affirmative on “spam in a can” modules.
MEO would be a pain, as it would take more dV to get there from LEO or Earth.
Interesting, facts to know. However, in my future history these particular vehicles never travel to Earth, they are not intended for interplanetary transport.
This particular type of spacecraft serves exclusively in and among the moons of Saturn, in local intraorbital commerce, servicing space habitats (which are independent city states).
The habitats in Jupiter and Saturn orbit are a legacy of 500 years of the Martian terraforming program. Terraforming was by means of resource importation which requires tens of thousands of flights (if not hundreds of thousands) over a span of 500 years between Mars and targets at Jupiter and Saturn. Carrying out such extensive operations, i.e. the mining and shipping of chemical ices back to Mars, carries with it the requirement for extensive construction of industrial infrastructure at both Jupiter and Saturn.
In my future history Earth has no role the settlement of Mars, its terraforming, in the industrialization of the outer solar system, and is only briefly a player on the interplanetary stage, in a strictly military role, in a failed attempt to seize by force what the Martians, and the citizens of the outer solar system space colonies, built with generations of labor.
There are extensive asteroid belt mining operations, and commerce between all parties and Mars, however all interplanetary commerce uses nuclear pulse propulsion cargo haulers. Habitats at Jupiter, Saturn, and Mars are the main trading partners participating in interplanetary commerce. At Mars payloads are deorbited via Closed Cycle Gas Core Nuclear Light Bulb powered shuttles.