Mature Content
This content is intended for mature audiences
Log in to confirm your age
vishstudio's avatar

Espionage

771 36 18K (2 Today)
By vishstudio   |   
Mature  |  Published:
© 2012 - 2020 vishstudio
Kirill and Natalia
Image size
2848x4027px 6.26 MB
IMAGE DETAILS
Make
NIKON CORPORATION
Model
NIKON D300S
Shutter Speed
1/200 second
Aperture
F/3.2
Focal Length
50 mm
ISO Speed
100
Date Taken
Apr 1, 2012, 3:28:26 PM
Software
Adobe Photoshop CS6 (13.0 20120305.m.415 2012/03/05:21:00:00) (Windows)
Comments36
anonymous's avatar
Join the community to add your comment. Already a deviant? Log In
spor's avatar
spor Photographer

his big hands xx

Zaid9's avatar
Zaid9New Deviant

Sexy

faykate's avatar
just... wow. one of my favorite photos of all time. I think I had a (really great) drawing of this photo favorited before I stumbled upon the actual photo! amazing!
MurkyVisions's avatar
MurkyVisionsStudent General Artist
Very sensual!
Pollybugg's avatar
Love this photo
RawPoetry's avatar
RawPoetryHobbyist Photographer
This is gorgeous!!
DarthWill3's avatar
DarthWill3Hobbyist Traditional Artist
How cute!
szymkowski's avatar
szymkowskiHobbyist Photographer
nice one!
BTBArtist's avatar
BTBArtistHobbyist Traditional Artist
Stunning !!!! absolutely stunning .
Beautiful image
waikar3d's avatar
waikar3dProfessional Digital Artist
awesome shot
AokiBengal's avatar
that's strangely the most modest, sensual and playful nip slip I've ever seen. Beautifully tasteful.
UrsaMinor45's avatar
UrsaMinor45Hobbyist Traditional Artist
The hands are very expressive; great tenderness
PenofGold's avatar
PenofGoldStudent Traditional Artist
nice body, no fat.
noirart23's avatar
*snicker* If you're talking about the girl, then you're an idiot. She's has boobs doesn't she? And what exactly do you think those are composed of lol? Air?
JoeGP's avatar
JoeGPHobbyist Photographer
well they're sure as hell not made of fat [link]
this is what happens when you skip school
noirart23's avatar
From your source (wikipedia):
"the milk-glands-to-*fat* ratio is 1:1 in a non-lactating woman. In addition to the milk glands, the breast also is composed of connective tissues, white fat,"
"The Breast: cross-section scheme of the mammary gland.
1. Chest wall
2. Pectoralis muscles
3. Lobules
4. Nipple
5. Areola
6. Milk duct
7. Fatty tissue<-(In biology, adipose tissue or body fat or fat depot or just fat)
8. Skin"

Other sources: - ©Copyright: UBM Medica Australia, 2000-2012.

"Women’s breasts are made up of fat, nipple, glands (alveoli) and a network of ducts through which milk can pass from the glands to the nipples."
"The spaces around the lobes and ducts are filled with fatty tissue and ligaments. The size of a non-lactating breast is largely determined by the amount of fat it contains as the gland structure is not that well developed."


... damn. Looks like you got me. Guess there really is no fat in breasts uh? Please, feel free to disagree with both your own sources and health articles. If you still arn't convinced, i could always send you my university bio book :)
JoeGP's avatar
JoeGPHobbyist Photographer
From your own quote "the milk-glands-to-*fat* ratio is 1:1" ... so you skipped out on math class as well :-o such a bad girl
Let me translate, it means they are only half fat at best. i never said they didn't contain fat.
Oh and i "love" your sarcastic reply, thankfully i don't have to disagree with anything, bye now
noirart23's avatar
Well, since you're being so... precise, I'll point out that the original comment to which I replied said, "nice body, no fat." Thus, I pointed out that breasts have fat in them. The word I used, in fact, was composed. By composed, I meant that fat are parts of the whole, being the breasts. So no need to translate. I never said that they contained only fat. I "love" how you noticed how I named all the other parts that compose breasts. I'm glad you enjoyed my sarcasm :) and even more thankful that you've decided there's no need to disagree with anything. Bye to you too!
JoeGP's avatar
JoeGPHobbyist Photographer
remind me next time never to talk to anyone who call's complete strangers idiot, they are usually talking about themselves
noirart23's avatar
Yeah. I mean who goes around commenting on a finished conversation almost 7 months old between two people they don't know, for the simple purpose of calling a complete stranger uneducated and implying that they lack intelligence? Completely ridiculous. Why, no one would do something like that. It's so pointless!
PenofGold's avatar
PenofGoldStudent Traditional Artist
jealous?
noirart23's avatar
Of her boobs?
PenofGold's avatar
PenofGoldStudent Traditional Artist
sure
noirart23's avatar
Meh. W/e. I'm not arguing with an opinion. I was just pointing it out. It's a nice picture. There. Done.
anonymous's avatar
Join the community to add your comment. Already a deviant? Log In