Shop Forum More Submit  Join Login
Political Correctness never was about being offensive, every living person will sooner or later be offended by someone or something.  It is all about language manipulation and censorship to promote an agenda, camouflaged as appropriateness.   It is using flowery euphemisms to soften injustices and immorality and to sway opinions by redefining words to accomplish goals.  It does not immediately change what people think, it only changes what they can say.   Eventually, however, it eliminates opposing thoughts altogether because if you control the language, you control how people think.    That is why Political Correctness is promoted by the radical reformist movement; they can keep changing the goal posts in attempted to eventually change societies thinking.

For example, the use of the acronym LGBT even in an opposing presentation is, in fact, supporting the pro-sodomy movement because pro-activists established it. The list of sexual orientations is a long one, however, pro-sodomy activists chose LGBT because the acronym pulls select behaviors from the complete list of other orientations including pedophilia, necrophilia, zoophilia/bestiality, etc. (from "Paraphilias," Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders, Fourth Edition, Text Revision (Washington: American Psychiatric Association, pp. 566-582). It separates the idea of “bad or immoral behavior" and ties it in with "the person" which plays right into the hand of Identity Politics, the “Social Justice” ideology and the Politically Correct movement.   Activists did this in order to lessen the stigma of sodomy.  In actuality, we are letting them control the language by using it.  The term “social justice” is in parenthesizes because there is really no such thing as social injustice, there is merely injustice.

Another perfect example of the madness of Political Correctness is the initial redefining of “physical violence” to cover verbal abuse, then the eventual redefining of, or the attempt at redefining, verbal abuse to include “offensive to”, which brought about the whole “microagression culture” on many college campuses followed by “safe zones” (even if there was no intended malice in the offense).  This has now lead to moving the goal posts once again to demand the use of specialized, and “newly created and defined” pronouns.
Those influenced by the Politically Correct Cyclone have even gone full circle with racism. They now justify hate of white people based solely on their skin color yet fully celebrate Black History Month.  Certain transgender groups are now objecting to “bisexual” because it presumes the existence of only two genders and feminists are at odds with transgenderism because it promotes more than two genders. Yet feminists protest side by side with radical Islamists who defame, defile and even deform women through genital mutilation.

So is it honestly at all surprising that many conservatives would like nothing more than to sit down and honestly examine why you disagree with their position, however, many of the opposition are not interested in the conservative viewpoint on any issue, they simply want you to agree with them and if you are unwilling to do so, they feel the need to force into compliance?
Edited and reposted for the Group Controversy Inc.
Add a Comment:
 
:iconschwiftposting:
Schwiftposting Featured By Owner Feb 15, 2019
Sodomy is fine. Pedophilia, necrophilia and zoophilia/bestiality are not.
One involves consenting adults. The rest dont. Doesn't take a rocket scientist to recognise that.
Reply
:iconsliceofedge:
SliceOfEdge Featured By Owner Edited Mar 10, 2019  Hobbyist Artist
You seem to think that if it`s consent between two adults, it`s okay. Two people who cheat on their spouses are consenting. Because in order to cheat on a spouse it takes those two people to consent to the relationship. Every sexual act is consent except rape. 
Reply
:iconschwiftposting:
Schwiftposting Featured By Owner Mar 10, 2019
Nice strawman you b-built there. Emote| Rick Rolls his eyes 
Cheating is shit, dawg. It's not something that should be illegal, but it does suck.
Reply
:iconsliceofedge:
SliceOfEdge Featured By Owner Mar 10, 2019  Hobbyist Artist
But as long as it`s between two consenting people who “love” each other, it`s okay right? :B
Reply
:iconschwiftposting:
Schwiftposting Featured By Owner Mar 12, 2019
It's not okay, as in it's not moral, but it's not something that should be criminalised either.
Reply
:iconsliceofedge:
SliceOfEdge Featured By Owner Mar 12, 2019  Hobbyist Artist
So what you're saying is consenting adults is what makes it okay unless it`s something you don`t like.  When I showed you consent doesn't mean things have to be okay, you switched to it not being moral. Why isn`t homosexuality wrong? :?
Reply
:iconschwiftposting:
Schwiftposting Featured By Owner Mar 13, 2019
What I'm saying is that it's not okay, as in it's not moral, but it's not something that should be criminalised either.
You can read, c-can't you? Rick and Morty Emote - Stubborn Rick 

Just cause something's not moral d-doesn't mean it should be illegal. Also homosexuality is okay.
Emote| Hi, how are ya Have you been drinking too much or are you just real dumb? 
Reply
:iconsliceofedge:
SliceOfEdge Featured By Owner Edited Mar 13, 2019  Hobbyist Artist
Yes, I can read :B I just got confused with what you said before. And I like to have a consistent (and mature) argument please :aww:
As far as you believing homosexuality is not wrong you never explained why it isn`t lol. I was not making a comparison between sodomy and cheating, I was making an analogy with the acts of consenting. Consenting is what you based your argument on, not consenting AND morality. You didn`t say anything about morality in your initial statement about sodomy, pedophilia, etc., your argument wasn`t immorality, it was consenting. And in both those instances the consenting is there.
I hope that gave you a better picture of where I was coming from uwu
Reply
(1 Reply)
:iconsliceofedge:
SliceOfEdge Featured By Owner Jan 28, 2019  Hobbyist Artist
Reply
:icontheofficeofthenight:
TheOfficeOfTheNight Featured By Owner Jan 28, 2019   General Artist
Thanks for the note.
Reply
:iconsliceofedge:
SliceOfEdge Featured By Owner Jan 28, 2019  Hobbyist Artist
No problem :v
Reply
:icongraeystone:
Graeystone Featured By Owner Dec 29, 2018
Talking about LGBT. . .

10 year old boy made stripper news articleOH MY GODS AMERICA! What the fuck!? What the actual fuck!? 
https://www.dangerous.com/49809/half-naked-10-year-old-boy-dances-on-stage-for-money-at-adult-gay-bar-in-new-york/?fbclid=IwAR05tHqZ77QvSreFXo12vJVQ0x1w3Bm_xAqoZ7S8gG6uw5_w_Y-It5mHmX0
Things that won't make the 6:30PM World News. . .or even made into a 'parallel episode' of Law & Order:SVU.

I realized that couple of days ago that there is a couple of phrases that need to be 'reverted' back to the original terms-
Human Trafficking = Slavery.
Sex Trafficking= Sex Slavery.
Child Refugees= Child Sex Slavery(IMO, more times than not!)
Reply
:icontheofficeofthenight:
TheOfficeOfTheNight Featured By Owner Dec 29, 2018   General Artist
I know, I saw the story a while back somewhere else.  Kids that age merely want attention, they have no idea what they're doing.  But those watching know exactly what is going on. At 10 years old, you're right on the line between pre-pubescent and post-pubescent.  Borderline pedophilia vs homosexuality. And then the ppro-sodomy advocates will say they aren't involved in the de-stigmatization of pedophilia!   Right, they are 100% in support of any perverted sex act there is.  You've heard the saying "misery loves company?  Insert the word perversion for misery.  No clue why the Feds didn't move in on that if the locals were letting it ride.

Agreed on the reversions as well, and there are hundreds more out there because the mass media is swallowing them up and promoting them.  That's like a a stamp I saw about abortion.  "Pro-choice isn't pro-abortion, it's in favor of de-criminalizing abortion".  Okay, so Con-choice isn't against abortion, it's for the criminalizing of abortion.  ??
Reply
:iconmasterix2442:
Masterix2442 Featured By Owner Dec 29, 2018
Never thought of it to this extent. An interesting outlook.
Reply
:icontheofficeofthenight:
TheOfficeOfTheNight Featured By Owner Dec 29, 2018   General Artist
Thanks you and thanks for reading it!!
Reply
:iconatswordspoint:
AtSwordsPoint Featured By Owner Dec 28, 2018
Didn't I comment on this once already?
Reply
:icontheofficeofthenight:
TheOfficeOfTheNight Featured By Owner Dec 28, 2018   General Artist
You did, LOL!, I messed up and deleted the first version.  Care to repeat it?
Reply
:iconatswordspoint:
AtSwordsPoint Featured By Owner Dec 28, 2018
I can't remember it!!
Reply
:iconfujin777:
Fujin777 Featured By Owner Dec 28, 2018  Hobbyist Writer
This is why it must die! For it is cancer and a big form of sickness.
Reply
:icontheofficeofthenight:
TheOfficeOfTheNight Featured By Owner Dec 28, 2018   General Artist
So true, a good start to loosing our freedom of speech!  Thx for stopping by!
Reply
:iconfujin777:
Fujin777 Featured By Owner Dec 28, 2018  Hobbyist Writer
No problem.
Reply
Add a Comment:
 
×


Featured in Collections

Journals Literature Words.... by fmr0




Details

Submitted on
December 28, 2018
Link
Thumb

Stats

Views
165
Favourites
12 (who?)
Comments
23