Shop Forum More Submit  Join Login
Enuma Elish - Enlil + Tiamat by talfar Enuma Elish - Enlil + Tiamat by talfar
Энума Элиш - бой Энлиля с Тиамат (Тэльфар Спранга. Пленники субботы или Трахнуть Машиаха!)
Add a Comment:
 
:iconvxl-viper-lxv:
vxl-Viper-lxv Featured By Owner Edited Dec 16, 2016  Hobbyist General Artist
Tiamat is my God, fuck marduk.
Dude made man to be slaves.

Better to reign in hell.
Reply
:iconqichmam-nrsg:
QichMam-nrsg Featured By Owner Jul 2, 2015  Hobbyist General Artist
awesome
Reply
:iconenkililsta8411:
EnkiLilstA8411 Featured By Owner Edited Sep 23, 2014  Professional Artist
Enlil be like - It was a horror fight with tiamat war here and there blood everywere what an agony o man you should be there NO you better you where didnt there ...

while .... The Hero Enlil Finally defeat Tiamat .... :D (Big Grin) for him(them) but i like tiamat a really hero brave warrior 
Reply
:iconenkililsta8411:
EnkiLilstA8411 Featured By Owner Sep 23, 2014  Professional Artist
Enlil need to eat (really skinny) XD or he did forgot XD 
Reply
:iconenkililsta8411:
EnkiLilstA8411 Featured By Owner Aug 16, 2014  Professional Artist
Tiamat ^^ awesome
Reply
:iconoldboy078:
oldboy078 Featured By Owner Aug 2, 2013
The anunnaki were humanoid but giants. I see them more like the pale white aliens from the Prometheus movie.
Reply
:iconeveney:
eveney Featured By Owner Mar 12, 2013  Hobbyist Digital Artist
there are several mythos and theories for all the summerian culture, but it's so stupid to think that the annunaki are reptilians, why would a race create humans to after all the hard work try to control their minds in a secret society called the illuminati?

we must exterminate the reptilians.
Reply
:icondolphinsilverwolf:
DolphinSilverwolf Featured By Owner Feb 7, 2013
"So you see, I used to have a pet dragon, but he drooled way too much...probably because of those organophosphate pesticides..."
Reply
:iconbellagbear:
BellaGBear Featured By Owner Jan 30, 2013  Student Artisan Crafter
haha LOVE YOUR dragon :D
Reply
:iconnunenkur:
Nunenkur Featured By Owner Aug 29, 2012
A.NUN.NA means literally "those of the noble seed" , it's "the noble offspring" of the Great Bull of Heaven - the primeval totemic non-anthropomorphic image of the sky-god AN. That's why a significant attribute of Them is the tiara of bull horns they wear. This Bull of Heaven was worshipped by all the Bronze Age cultures all over the world, and during the Bronze Age the sun was seen on the Vernal Equinox in the constellation of Taurus. So the historic Brozne Age, when the earliest known civilizations appeared, coincided with the zodiacal era of Taurus. Maybe it was the constellation Taurus where the Noble Ones came from. The 7 Pleiads of Taurus were of great significance for the Sumerians.

The Sumerian word USZUM.GAL - great serpent, or dragon was an often met epithet for the Anunna deities. They were shape-shifters and could take whatever form they find for appropriate. The dragons from my native folklore often take human form in order to tempt humans. It was after the Akkadian invasion when the Anunna were perceived mainly in anthropomorphic form. The Anunna deities were known to possess an awe-inspiring radiance, or aura known as "me-lam2" in Sumerian, so humans should prostrate in their presence in order to survive their brilliance.

As for the Babylonian "Enuma Elish", it was a later, even a 'modern' creation in comparison with the ancient Sumerian traditions. It was rather a political ideology invented by the Babylonian priesthood to centralize, magnify and perpetuate the cult of Marduk unknown to the Sumerians. Neither was Tiamat, nor any conflict between the older and younger generations of deities known in Sumerian times. The modern popular culture, however, deems as "Sumerian" everything connected with Mesopotamia.

Even the name "Sumer" is how the Akkadians referred to the land of Southern Mesopotamia they conquered in the 24 century BCE. The original name for the land was KI.EN.GI - the Land of the Reed Lords, and the 'sumerians' called themselves "sang-gig2-ga" - the black-headed people. They were of an unknown and extinct race whose language was neither Semitic, nor Indo-European, nor of any other known language group. The 'Anunnaki' is a popular corruption from the Sumerian a-nun-na-ke4 where the sign ke4 is a grammatical case. So it could be said that the civilizatory testament of the Noble Ones got corrupted by those who later inherited the Sumerian culture - both the Semites and the Indo-Europeans (aka Aryans).

What I wrote is not intended to discourage the interested in the matter but to turn the attention to the deeper Anunna's mystery.
Reply
:iconysgraithe:
ysgraithe Featured By Owner Dec 12, 2012  Hobbyist Artist
highly unlikely they're reptilian alien gods though :P
Reply
Flagged as Spam
:iconwhitedraco71:
WhiteDraco71 Featured By Owner Jan 22, 2013  Hobbyist Digital Artist
Sitchin's work isn't crap, it's the result of decades of independent research by a man who obviously thought there was more to this world than conventional wisdom dictated. People call his work 'crap' because it's the popular thing to do. People who are intellectually honest will come to their own conclusions based on their observations rather than parroting whatever is the most popular thing to say at a given time.

Personally, I disagree with much of ancient Sumerian mythology and also with some of what little I know about Sitchin's works, but I don't think either is crap. Sumerian religion was tied in with Sumerian government, so its mythology had to reflect the legitimacy of the rule of whatever Sumerian king happened to rule at a given time. It doesn't make Sumerian mythology accurate, but it doesn't change the fact that the mythology itself is a collective work of genius. As what little I know of Sitchin's works is what I've heard second-hand, I can't comment honestly on the quality of the work itself, but I admire his courage in writing something that was vastly different than the so-called knowledge of human society, which is extremely limited regardless of the scientific advances that have been made in the last hundred years.
Reply
Flagged as Spam
:iconwhitedraco71:
WhiteDraco71 Featured By Owner Jan 22, 2013  Hobbyist Digital Artist
"I do not call crap because is popular. In fact, I didn't hear anyone call it crap before, they just didn't give any attention to it (it don't deserve it). "

You start off your big response to me with two logical fallacies, one being Argumentum ex Silentio or "it must be false because nobody pays attention to it," and Bandwagoning, or "Everybody believes x so it must be true."

Reading further down, I notice that you keep referring to 'The actual translations of Sumerian documents' as your source of information. First and foremost, if it's a translation, then it's not the original document. How am I to know that the translations you continue to proclaim as The Real McCoy are any more accurate than Sitchin's translations?

You say that he had no proof whatsoever of any of the things he claimed, and yet based on what little I do know of his works, he did have some proof, for instance is the ancient Sumerian knowledge of our solar system, which western science only came close to discovering with telescopes in the last hundred years.

Also, "Conjectural knowledge?" You apparently don't know what conjecture is, and that right there further destroys your argument...

According to Merriam Webster Online at [link] , Conjecture is defined as...

1
obsolete
a : interpretation of omens
b : supposition
2
a : inference from defective or presumptive evidence
b : a conclusion deduced by surmise or guesswork
c : a proposition (as in mathematics) before it has been proved or disproved

This means that the conventional wisdom you espouse is actually basing its entire argument on guesswork and presupposition, not upon hard evidence. The scientific community decides what is 'real' and what is not based upon a consensus agreement, where a majority of scientists agree on a given explanation. This is, put more simply, deciding what is real by a majority vote, and in so doing the scientific community is fatally flawed when it comes to controversial topics such as the works of independent thinkers like Sitchin.

I cannot take your argument seriously because you are literally grasping at straws to find anything that will support your views, and in so doing you've weakened your stance. And the abundance of logical fallacies in your long rant is dumbfounding... appeal to authority, appeal to the masses... such as your statement "Only people with no knowledge of history will aproach credully about those things invented by Sitchin..."

You are, as I originally said, stating that Sitchin's work is crap because it is the popular thing to do... that statement from you that I just quoted demonstrates that. If you truly wanted people to think for themselves, you would not be painting "Science" as "the Good Guy" and Sitchin as "The Bad Guy" the way you have done.
Reply
Flagged as Spam
:iconwhitedraco71:
WhiteDraco71 Featured By Owner Jan 22, 2013  Hobbyist Digital Artist
You keep saying there is evidence... when are you going to provide it?
Reply
Flagged as Spam
:iconwhitedraco71:
WhiteDraco71 Featured By Owner Jan 22, 2013  Hobbyist Digital Artist
"Blah blah blah SCIENCE... blah blah blah YOU'RE STUPID CUZ YOU THINK SITCHIN MIGHT HAVE BEEN INTELLIGENT HURR DURR... blah blah"

That is what your entire argument this whole time has been. You have yelled, cursed, insulted, and have used logical fallacies such as ad hominem and the other ones I've already listed while claiming that you speak on behalf of logic, reason, and evidence. Sorry, but that doesn't work... you need to provide evidence that backs up your claims, but instead you keep talking about how science works and why you think it is infallible, just like a religious zealot would say the same thing about his or her religion. I, on the other hand, have stated fact, cited sources, and remained relatively calm given the sheer volume of times you've attacked Sitchin's works without providing the evidence necessary to back your claims up, and have implied that anyone who would take his work seriously is somehow less than intelligent. I will go so far as to say that you are wrong, because if you truly believed you were right you would have no reason to intimidate anyone who thinks differently than you do.
Reply
(1 Reply)
:icontalfar:
talfar Featured By Owner Jan 21, 2013  Professional Writer
Sitchin is a not crap! Sitchin is a genius jew! He make a great PR of Mesopotamian mythology! Anunnaki is a very beautiful aliens like humans - it is not reptilian! Viva Zecharia Sitchin and Alan Alford! Paleocontact forewer!
Reply
:iconysgraithe:
ysgraithe Featured By Owner Jan 19, 2013  Hobbyist Artist
No arguments there, Sitchin is just a sci fi author, he may think otherwise but he's deluded.
Reply
:icontsuki222:
Tsuki222 Featured By Owner Feb 14, 2012
Cool pic
Reply
:iconancalagan:
Ancalagan Featured By Owner Oct 18, 2011  Professional Traditional Artist
its a great thing to know all the history in sumeria


and all abouth the enuma elish and the anunaki

reptilant alien gods :p
Reply
:icontalfar:
talfar Featured By Owner Nov 9, 2011  Professional Writer
Thank you very much!
But Anunnaki are the humanoids like humans! They is not reptilies!!!
Reply
:iconchristian-attridge:
Christian-Attridge Featured By Owner Jan 25, 2013  Professional Writer
Annunaki are reptilians
Reply
:icontalfar:
talfar Featured By Owner Jan 25, 2013  Professional Writer
You is full! You don,t read original Sumerian myths! Ancient Mesopotamian texts said: Anunnaki (or Dindirs) is very beautiful gods like humans!
Reply
:iconchristian-attridge:
Christian-Attridge Featured By Owner Jan 25, 2013  Professional Writer
Au contrariť, my mislead mamushka, im a renown scholar of ancient sumerian deitys, and I can assure you the Anunnaky are indeed the reptilians, so, if you wish to be accurate, i suggest you start drawing antropomorphic looking gekkos ipso facto.
Reply
:icontalfar:
talfar Featured By Owner Jan 25, 2013  Professional Writer
Ha-ha-ha-ha-ha! :)
I see - you read a stupid books by crazy "contacters" ("Inuaki - reptilia in me" and another crap). But I read a serious literature of sumerology and assiriology: for example, "History begin in Sumer" by S.N. Kramer and "The people of Ur city" by I.M. Djyakonov. You don,t understand Dingirs!
Reply
:iconchristian-attridge:
Christian-Attridge Featured By Owner Jan 25, 2013  Professional Writer
Perhaps because the anglo-saxon Language is not your mother tongue, you were not able to capture the gist of my discourse, i am a scholar of all things sumerian, i dont need to read the books, i write them, dont fight the reptilians, what are you trying to hide,
Reply
Add a Comment:
 
×




Details

Submitted on
October 14, 2011
Image Size
3.4 MB
Resolution
1654×2289
Link
Thumb

Stats

Views
8,557
Favourites
67 (who?)
Comments
32
Downloads
585