Rupert Murdoch- Pimp of Page 3

The fact is it is natural for men to want to look at attractive naked females. Women are objects in that they are physical objects with shape and volume, and men naturally appreciate the form of these objects. That doesn't mean seeing them as less than human or denying that they have feelings, intellects, rights, etc. An animate object, however, is still an object. The appreciation of the physical female form, (as an object, if you must) is not inherently wrong or sinister. Using tits to sell 'newspapers' is catering to a pretty dumb market, but I don't see how the models are more exploited than the 'reader', whose weakness for the sight of female flesh is exploited. The models are free agents, choosing to sell an asset that they happen to possess, and making money for minimal labour or sacrifice of time. To see them as exploited victims is simplistic and a case of projection. It is cultural Marxism and liberal fascism to insist that the world is made up only of wicked oppressive/exploiters and innocent oppressed/exploited victims. There is much more give and take in every equation.

If someone is forced against their will into the sex industry then that is unequivocally wrong. Rape is unequivocally wrong. But the kind of extreme feminist stance that all women in the sex industry are exploited victims is absurd. It is patronising to the women in question, implying that they are incapable of deciding what to do with their lives. It is also misandric, presenting male desire as inherently wicked.