Red by SusanCoffey

no I am very much aware of how the female body is proportioned and supposed to be shaped. I know because I work with 3D modeling, I draw art (humans being my specialty), and I am a female myself. I can say without a doubt that the girl in this picture is HORRIFICALLY disproportional.

The arms of a female (or even a male to be exact) should not be that long. The tips of the fingers should reach at just about half way down the thigh.

The torso of a female should be only one or two centimeters shorter than the arm (minus the hands and fingers)

Females are naturally supposed to be curvy. The body of a female naturally stores fat in the bust and especially the hips. Either this image is photo-shopped, or this poor lady is not eating enough and not giving her body enough fat. (Yes, it is healthy to have a little bit of fat. Fat is not always a bad thing.)

and the same thing goes for the legs. Female legs are also supposed to be curvy.

Don't believe me? Take a look [link]

Indeed, the image I linked to shows that arms (including the hands) naturally go about half way down the thigh.

Indeed, the image I linked to shows that the torso is about as long as arms (minus the hands)

And indeed, the image I linked to shows that females are naturally curvy.

It's only basic anatomy, darling. And I'm sorry to say that the woman in this picture is horrifically disproportional. This is either due to poor photo-shopping "skills" or not giving her body enough fat...

Remember how she's slanted though- her shoulder's aren't straight; she's leaning against the doorframe. That's what makes her arms look so long; and the thinness comes from being a model. My sister's similarly sized- very very slim- but eats a ton, just is so anxious that it all burns off amazingly fast