Shop Forum More Submit  Join Login
Freedom Flotilla by SoberHigh Freedom Flotilla by SoberHigh
Remember the 31st of MAY: One more crime of humanity added to Israel terrorist score.
The massacre of civilian activists in the dead of the night.... carrying humanitarian aid to a starved and blockaded population.
The world wakes up to the news that Israel can kill civilians of any nationality, and get away with it.

Join us on facebook: [link]
Add a Comment:
 
:iconmustafacan:
mustafacan Featured By Owner Jun 18, 2010  Professional Photographer
[link] added.
Reply
:iconnoor-al-haqiqa:
Noor-al-Haqiqa Featured By Owner Jun 10, 2010
There are at least 9 bodies/people unaccounted for. This is very important for many reasons, not just the crime of murder or drowning but also can cast a pall on the flotilla as well. They could be fish food, body parts, jailed. But there were more than 19 dead and at least, according to the survivor I heard today, around 50 injured.
Reply
:iconrostichek:
Rostichek Featured By Owner Jun 9, 2010
Well
You must see that
[link]
Reply
:iconsoberhigh:
SoberHigh Featured By Owner Jun 10, 2010
Seen it, what do you think of it?
Reply
:iconrostichek:
Rostichek Featured By Owner Jun 10, 2010
Finally
The true.
Reply
:iconsoberhigh:
SoberHigh Featured By Owner Jun 10, 2010
Hmmmmm, it's interesting that you consider this video parody the "truth"!
This goes to show how deluded and insensitive you are!!!!
This video can be described as nothing but a distasteful and insulting provocation. To claim that they had terrorist ties is one thing, but to make fun of those killed and injured on the Freedom Flotilla, is not only insulting, but quite frankly very disturbing.
My rage over the flotilla massacre have doubled after watching this video! The Israeli government is mocking those who died and got injured and furthermore, mocking the anger of the world!
If that’s not the height of arrogance & conceit, I don’t know what is!
Israeli impunity has already been shown in the cases of Western peace activists Rachel Corrie and Tom Hurndell who were killed while peacefully protesting against Israeli army actions against Palestinian citizens. But this last incident, it’s fallout and how Israel deals with the global anger at it, surpasses the limits of arrogance and conceit.

NOW you tell me what you think of this: [link]
Reply
:iconrostichek:
Rostichek Featured By Owner Jun 10, 2010
Global anger you say?
Mmm. I say Global old fashion antisemitism
In stile of A Dreyfus affair, if you know what i am talking about....
Freedom Flotilla you say?
Peace makers with knifes an tubes? Interesting way of making peace...
If it was not provocation that what is mining of that word?
People are died...
Well world will be ok without of couple terrorists i think ...
Reply
:iconsoberhigh:
SoberHigh Featured By Owner Jun 10, 2010
"People are dead...
Well world will be ok without of couple terrorists i think ..."

I think Hitler used similar words referring to the Jews!!! Which goes to describe your indoctrinated state of mind!!!

antisemitism you say? Again, the same good ol' excuse for dismissing any accusations to Israel!

I'm not Anti-Semitic btw, cause I'm Semitic (yes Arabs are too!)

I'm not anti-jewish either.... nor anti any race or religion for that matter!

I'm however anti-bloodshed
anti-WAR
anti-oppression
anti-tyranny
anti-aggression
and if that means anti-Israel, so be it!!!

Don't you realize that the roles have changed? Israel now is the new fascism, Zionists are the oppressors not the victim anymore!

It's funny this still think like they are the victims though!!! hilarious may I add!
Reply
:iconrostichek:
Rostichek Featured By Owner Jun 10, 2010
You can say until tomorrow that you are not antisemitic
And yea i know that Arabs are simits
And if you are against aggression so why i can't hear you(Arabs)
when people dieing at buses
Why when some stupid Muslim fanatic idiot shooting at disco and kills children
you are so speechles?
Reply
:iconsoberhigh:
SoberHigh Featured By Owner Jun 10, 2010
you mean the truth?
Reply
:iconinsanewalk:
insanewalk Featured By Owner Jun 6, 2010
9 were killed, get your facts straight
and Israel acted in self-defense
Reply
:iconsoberhigh:
SoberHigh Featured By Owner Jun 7, 2010
My facts are just fine insane! I know that they are nine, but that was made one day after the Massacre, when Israel imposed a blackout on the incident and no one knew exactly how many were killed.

I will change the numbers though...

As for the "Self-Defense" claims, you are absolutely right about that too, the poor peaceful Israeli commandos armed with the most advanced weapons on earth, were defending themselves from the evil unarmed peace activists!
Reply
:iconinsanewalk:
insanewalk Featured By Owner Jul 13, 2010
Unarmed? Really?

Do some more research before making any bold claims.

Israel did make a mistake, and they should have handled the situation differently, but once the soliders were being attacked with knives, live fire, poles, chains and all the other weapons that were found on the boat, they had no choice but to defend themselves.

And in terms of the blockade, do you understand why it is imposed? If Hamas did not fire any rockets to begin with, there would never have been any type of blockade. Israel wants to live side by side with the Palestinians, but the Palestinians refuse to allow Israel to exist. Israel has every right to the land, just as much as the Palestinians.

I can go on a long historical rant, but if you did some proper research, you would see my side.

Have a good day.
Reply
Flagged as Spam
:iconsoberhigh:
SoberHigh Featured By Owner Jun 6, 2010
Thank you MeRmaid... very insightful
Reply
:iconsoberhigh:
SoberHigh Featured By Owner Jun 2, 2010
MUST HEAR: An American woman who was on the flotilla headed for Gaza offers a first-hand account of the raid

[link]
Reply
:iconelmouna:
elmouna Featured By Owner Jun 1, 2010
Featured here [link] :)
Reply
:iconsoberhigh:
SoberHigh Featured By Owner Jun 1, 2010
Thank you
:)
I'm honored
Reply
:iconmagalosh:
magalosh Featured By Owner Jun 1, 2010
i happy i happy - goooood israel goood -
Reply
:icontimora87:
timora87 Featured By Owner Jun 1, 2010  Student General Artist
of course you are happy..what else can we expect from nazi monsters like you attacking peace activists in international water ..good keep being happy so that the whole world know the truth about you and ur terriorism
Reply
:iconcreeppingdeath:
CreeppingDeath Featured By Owner Aug 12, 2014  Student Digital Artist
fuck you
Reply
:iconmagalosh:
magalosh Featured By Owner Jun 2, 2010
hahahah peace sheaping with weapon and hate
you make me laugh,
loser
Reply
:icontimora87:
timora87 Featured By Owner Jun 2, 2010  Student General Artist
of course we don't expect cowards like you to actually admit what they did but at least when u lie try to find something less hilarious .the freedom flotilla was inspected in every port they passed by and all ports confirmed that the ships had no weapons and more over israel attacked the ship in international water which is pure piracy and illegal
keep laughing ur doing an excellent job in showing the world how barbaric u are..ur even worst than nazis..they at least had the guts to admit what they did
Reply
:iconmagalosh:
magalosh Featured By Owner Jun 2, 2010
of course you dont anderstood with all the sheap - no problem
only with one sheap - war
interressing no?
but you can't anderstood that. you are blind of justice
Reply
:icontimora87:
timora87 Featured By Owner Jun 2, 2010  Student General Artist
aah again another hilarious lie..open CNN and listen to what an american activist said about how ur soldiers treated her and injured her and by the way she was on one of "the other ships" u claim that it had no problem with ur israeli maniac soldiers
she said that they grabbed her by her hair and knocked her head that she lost conscience..is that what u call "no problem" or there has to be killed people so u can begin to consider that a problem..
for ur own information the reason why the main numbers of killed people and injured people was on the mavi marmara ship is because it was the ship carrying the majority of the passengers "600"
the others ships carried the cargo and the food they wanted to transport to gaza with lesser number of passengers
and don't even dare mention justice..u attacked peace activists in international water which is illegal..u attacked nd killed and injured civilians and u confiscated all their belongings and cameras...and yet u still have the nerves to speak about justice
and again i repeat the sentence u ignored " all ships including the mavi marmara were inspected in every port they passed by and there was no weapons found"
Reply
:iconmagalosh:
magalosh Featured By Owner Jun 2, 2010
you see only what you want - that why you are ininterressant
Reply
:icontimora87:
timora87 Featured By Owner Jun 2, 2010  Student General Artist
And that's the difference between us...while i answered each and every claim of urs u can't answer any of mine..which lead me to one conclusion..you will refuse to admit truth even if it came in front of ur eyes for u to see it but again the least of my interests is for u to admit for i know the likes of u will never do that ..my main interest is for the world to see who u really are..typical shamless nazis
Reply
(2 Replies)
:iconshaheeed:
shaheeed Featured By Owner May 31, 2010
ahh yeah just change the number and it can get higher still, and change the file here, good work, FREE PALESTINE.
Reply
:icongogyals:
GogyAls Featured By Owner May 31, 2010
freedom flotilla <3
israel to hell isa
Reply
:icontenshiru:
Tenshiru Featured By Owner May 31, 2010
Yeah. That's what happens when you try to lynch Israeli soldiers. The people on that ship weren't "defenseless" as the Arabic media claims. They were carrying both firearms and other types of weapons on board in an intention to hurt the soldiers who only tried to evacuate them peacefully. The Israeli soldiers DID NOT discharge their weapons until there was a certain threat to their lives- and there certainty was- those "peace activists" were trying to kill the Israeli soldiers, and the footage from the ship proves it.
Reply
:iconsoberhigh:
SoberHigh Featured By Owner Jun 1, 2010
Get your facts straight:
- Israeli soldiers invaded at least one ship and attacked the flotilla in international waters, breaking international law, and, in killing civilians, committed a war crime.
- The Israeli government approved the boarding of these aid ships by an elite unit of commandos, some even go to saying that the Israeli PM commandeered the attack. The soldiers were armed with automatic weapons to pacify the civilians on-board, but not with crowd dispersal weapons as they should have been if Israel was really seeking to prevent bloodshed.
- After the deadly massacre, Israel illegally confiscated aid supplies that were gathered by humanitarian organization for the population of GAZA, and un-rightfully detained civilians with no charge defy and breaking all human rights.
Reply
Flagged as Spam
:icontimora87:
timora87 Featured By Owner Jun 6, 2010  Student General Artist
mm maybe u should get ur facts straight too:
1- intending to deliver human aid to an illegaly bloackaded strip doesn't make those who intended to do so combatants nor attackers ..the united nations in its security council asked for an immediate lifting of the bloackade and considered it a human crime....is the security council considered a combatant too now?
2- opposing israel's policy doesn't make anyone a terriorist..so actually they are and will remain peace activists no matter what because they are a group of unarmed civilians who bring human aid to a population in distress
3- you are talking about a footage..i don't know which footage ur talking about since israel confiscated all media tools including cameras and recorders..so if ur talking about the footage taken by ur navy..that looses its crediabilty..specially that the footage that represents the other point of view is being confiscated..makes u wonder why?
4- yea M4s would ve clearly made the job easier for u ..to think of the trouble ur soldiers went through with paintballs guns makes one really sad!! you keep refering to the activists as terriorists!! the normal definition of a terriorist is someone intentionally attacking unarmed civilians in order to spread terror ..mm now with that definition it suits ur soldiers more.
5- ur soldiers started to shoot first even before landing from the helicopter with live emunitation so they ve initiated the attack first so u can't discribe them as self defensers anymore..u can't start beating someone up and ask people to consider ur act as self defense!! the fact that ur soldiers started the attack is not a claim of mine but rather from one of ur parliment members who was on board of the flotilla and on both CNN and BBC..is she a terriorist too? one of ur parilment members??
6- ur soldiers who have morals treated the activists after arrest with the worst treatment ever..according to an american activist that was on board of the american flagged ship ur soldiers grabbed her by her hair and knocked her head to the ground of the car that was due to depart them from the port and she lost concience

so confiscating supplies entering international zone to break an illegal bloackade "as initated by the united nations" illegal? well i m sure the supplies aren't going to get through whatsoever...mmm maybe u should sue the UN and the security council for asking to lift this bloackade
Reply
Flagged as Spam
:icontimora87:
timora87 Featured By Owner Jun 6, 2010  Student General Artist
1- again with the weird comaprisaons..so u admit being in the same positions as occupiers as germany was in world war 2..it's good to know that u ve finally admit it..yes if switzerland was to bring aid to england during world war two germany surely going to refuse..and of course anyone who would've resisted germany's decision to refuse was going to be called a terriorist by german government and therfore french resistance was also a form of terriorist s who oppose the nazis right to exist in other countries maybe they would ve been called " anti aric " as well
..u can't say ur being open to attack when u occupy a land and its been claimed by its original population again .. u occupied sinai in 1967 and egypt gained it back in 1973..don't attack if u don't want to be attacked back!!


2- the fact that the IHH is a terriorist group can't rely on the claims of a retired judge..there was no evidence for such claims we live in a world today with a lot of hidden purposes statments ..we can't rely on someone's position as judge to beleive their statment to declare an organization as a group of terriorists..turkey wouldn't have allowed a terriorst group to act as peace organization so until proven with evidence u can't call its members to be terriorists specially that these people rode the flottila unarmed..what kind of terriorsts go unarmed to the place they intend to attack?

3- well everything's possible nowdays..for all i know the tap can be fake why not..it's not impossible..the only thing todo to proove the opposite is by releasing all the footage taken by the reporters that u confiscated and please don't make me laugh..u don't want to show ur soldiers been beat up? if u want the world to beleive they ve been beating up u should maybe start by showing the world they ve been beat up !!! well now that turkey released the - the feared to go public- footage of ur soldiers wounded i think u have nothing more to be afraid of by releasing the other footage!!! ..my god that's hilarious..!!!

4-well i thought that as a soldier u would have perfectly known that ur army has the reputation of aiming intentionally on civilians on ceveral occasions for example the mohamed el durra incident recorded by the french press were ur soldiers intentionally kill the 9 years old mohamed el durra while being hidden with his father behind a trash can despite the fact that they both were screaming we r unarmed civilains please don't shoot!! maybe the name rachel corrie could give another example

5- well almost all countries let people who oppose its policies join the parlimant even dictatorship regime countries..it's a good form of propaganda..the difference between a democratic country and dectator one is what they call the oppostion party..the first one calls it the "opposition" the second one call it " those who want to destroy the country"

6- mm when the CNN asked the amercian women what she was doing she said they raised the white flag and they said through the microphone we r unarmend civilians don't attack..and they surrendered all of them " talking about the ship with the amercian flag" she did not resist..mm and well for ur own information that happend after the attack was over when they were transporting them .." It shows the soldiers self control that he didn’t smack her on the head with his rifle butt" it only showes what they teach u in the army to be called self control!!!

7- the UN is indeed usless in all respects expect for the exact opposite of what u say!!! the fact that israel commited all these crimes and condamned infront of the world court for war crimes and the goldstone human rights report and yet the UN didn't force any sort of punishment makes them really usless ..the fact that ur already build nukes are never questioned makes them useless
and the fact that they allowed u to steal a land from its original population and commiting ethnic cleansing against them as confessed by some of ur historians makes them usless..the fact that u took a whole land from its origianl population and made them refugees and yet complaining its too tight for u that's what i call despicable!!!
Reply
:iconsoberhigh:
SoberHigh Featured By Owner Jun 6, 2010
Nevermind him, it's is a fake account, he is spamming. Can't you tell by his nick name!

Check here:
[link]
Probably he is one of Israel's "army of bloggers"
They are getting desperate
Reply
:icontimora87:
timora87 Featured By Owner Jun 7, 2010  Student General Artist
yea i saw he just signed up yesterday that's why i decided not to reply any longer..it's usless and a waste of time
Reply
:icontenshiru:
Tenshiru Featured By Owner Jun 1, 2010
My facts are just fine, thank you very much, but I'll be more than happy to clarify some of your misunderstanding-

- The Israeli soldiers attacked, as I already said, only after they were provoked and physically attacked with knifes and other weapons by the "peace activists". There are footage that prove the Israeli soldiers weren't even able to come on board the ship and were already attacked by steel rods, smoke grenades, and other types of weapons, pulled off their safety ropes and thrown overboard.
-The Israeli soldiers were carrying paintball guns- which are weapons for crowd dispersal, and only used their own weapons after a true fear for their own and their comrades lives rose.
-All the confiscated supplies are on their way to Gaza as we speak, carried by the same "brutal" and "inhuman" army that those so called "peace activists" were trying to lynch. And the "peace activists" were detained for trying to murder Israeli soldiers, and therefor rightfully arrested.

Oh, and did I mention the Israeli government offered, before the ships departed from Turkey, that Israel would take the supplies to Gaza instead of the ships, exactly to avoid such a situation in the first place, but were refused? If all they wanted was to get the supplies to Gaza, why would they refuse? I'll tell you why- because they were looking for a conflict. If they weren't looking for trouble and only wanted to carry aid to Gaza, they wouldn't have had knifes and weapons on board the ship. They were planing to confront the Israeli army from day one, and some of them even commented to the media- "Either we win or die as shahid".
Reply
:iconsoberhigh:
SoberHigh Featured By Owner Jun 1, 2010
Well Mr. all informed, the Israeli soldiers had no business being on the ship on the first place.

It's normal that you get attacked if you are trying to invade! The activists are the ones who were trying to defend themselves...

and with what? clubs and kitchen knifes??? that is still qualified as "unarmed" btw!

The smoke grenades were thrown by the Israeli commandos... which is a standard procedure btw.

And I ask you this, if the Israeli's are so right and just, why is Israel imposing a media blackout as is the case with all Israeli attacks?

Here are the facts:
Israel has no right to control Gaza’s sea as its own territorial waters.
Israel has no right to blockade Gaza or to stop aid convoys arriving to Gaza by sea or any other routes.

In doing so, it proves that it is still in belligerent occupation of Gaza sector and its 1.5 million inhabitants. And as an occupation force, then under international law Israel is responsible for the welfare of the Strip’s inhabitants. Given that the blockade has put Palestinians under the worst starvation circumstance for the past four years, Israel should long ago have been in the dock for committing a crime against humanity.
Reply
:icontenshiru:
Tenshiru Featured By Owner Jun 1, 2010
It is not normal to attack a force that only came on board to stop the ship peacefully with no intention of hurting the civilians. The "peace activists" attacked and used extreme violence, up to a point where the soldiers feared for their own and their comrades lives without being provoked by the Israeli forces. The soldiers didn't even get a chance to come on board before they were taken down their safety ropes and beaten violently.

Knives and clubs can kill, period. If a couple of dozens of men came at you with clubs and knives, rest assure that you wouldn't be thinking- "Oh I'm safe, as long as it's just knives and clubs then they are technically unarmed, right?"

You will have to further explain what you mean by "media blackout" for I am not familiar with the term. If you mean that the Israeli government didn't allow broadcast out of the ship, I can assure you that it wasn't because they were planning to hurt any of the people on board, but more rationally because they didn't want to give the Arabs any more tools of propaganda by using footage of someone being peacefully taken off the ship and screaming and crying his eyes out that it's "unjust".

Israel HAS the right to control Gaza's sea as it's own territorial waters because.. well, it is Israel territorial waters whether you like it or not. Israel HAS the right to blockade Gaza because with the convoys of food and supplies also comes weapons and explosions that are later used against Israeli civilians.

Israel is responsible for the welfare of Gaza's civilians, but those civilians are shooting themselves in the leg by choosing terrorist groups as there leaders. Not too long ago, before the first Intifada, Israel allowed a lot more freedom to the civilians in Gaza, but when the terror began to struck Israel our government realized that without keeping Gaza under check, Israel will not be safe.
Reply
:icontimora87:
timora87 Featured By Owner Jun 1, 2010  Student General Artist
i m quoting u " If a couple of dozens of men came at you with clubs and knives, rest assure that you wouldn't be thinking- "Oh I'm safe, as long as it's just knives and clubs then they are technically unarmed, right?"
who came to who...israeli soldiers attacked the ship in international water..then ansewr me WHO CAME TO WHO??
ur paranoid lies about the weapons that come with the food supplies are just pethatic and hilarious
and yea as if israel is really threatend by arab propaganda ..don't u claim to be the only democratic state in the area? does democratic states prevent broadcast?? and oh my god ur hilarious " because they didn't want to give the Arabs any more tools of propaganda by using footage of someone being peacefully taken off the ship and screaming and crying his eyes out that it's "unjust". who the hell gives u the right to invade a ship in the international water and "peacefully" evacuate its passengers as u claim
and don't tell me u have the right to control gaza water because u don't according to international law but then again israel never cares about such things as international law u have ur own lies to justify everything and by actually replying u i m only aiming for showing the world who u really are
a lunatic racist state
Reply
:iconsoldierofisrael:
SoldierOfIsrael Featured By Owner Jun 6, 2010
who came to who? so if a group of policeman come to arrest you, even if your innocent, you can start stabbing them because theyre started on you? which country do you live in?
Reply
:icontimora87:
timora87 Featured By Owner Jun 6, 2010  Student General Artist
aah so now ur comparing israeli navy that kidnap and kill activist in international water to policmen arresting someone???
that's the most hilarious compariason i ve ever heard of!!
does israel own international water now so that it can acts like its police!!! and does normal sane police start shooting people before arresting them??
i live in a country where they use common sense..and where things are called with their real names..like for example calling ur navy so called "police raid" with its right name.."piracy"
Reply
(1 Reply)
:icontenshiru:
Tenshiru Featured By Owner Jun 4, 2010
The Israeli soldiers did come to the flotilla, but not with no intention to cause any harm to the civilians on the ship. The fact remains that the people on the ship, that some of them were hired terrorists hired for the sole reason of attacking the Israeli force that they knew would come on board at a certain point, attacked the soldiers with no provocation or reason to do so, and they attacked with knifes and firearms and clubs, forcing the soldiers to defend themselves.

About your claims about the propaganda- there is a deference between truthful propaganda and fabricated propaganda materials like those that the terrorists and activists on board the ships were trying, and succeeded unfortunately, to create. The IDF wanted to block the transmission from the ship so the activists won't be able to create such films showing the soldiers peacefully evacuating the people from the ship, while those people try to act up like they're being forced off the ship.

The fact remains the soldiers wanted to evacuate the ship peacefully but were not allowed to do so by the passengers. Those passengers used violence against the soldiers, tried to kill them and to take their weapons- and because of that, and ONLY because of that, the incident ended with bloodshed. If the passengers had allowed the soldiers to evacuate them peacefully as planned, none of this would have happened and we wouldn't be having this discussion. The terrorists on board those ships can only blame themselves for the situation that had developed.

And yes, we do have the right to invade a ship that is about to break a blockade that we had initiate on the Gaza strip. Because the Gaza strip is currently controlled by a council of terrorists. If the Gaza citizens wish to make their lives better, how about they stop blaming the country which is only trying to protect it's inhabitants (including a large sum of Arab-Israelis, Druse, Christians, and other religions, who by the way get equal rights and a right to represent themselves in the Israeli parliament [aren't we just a bunch of "lunatic racists"...]) and start with choosing better leaders for Gaza? Leaders who actually want peace and not use their citizens for bombing Israeli cities and shopping centers and buses?
Reply
:icontimora87:
timora87 Featured By Owner Jun 4, 2010  Student General Artist
No you don't have the right to control Gaza strip even if from your point of view it's been controlled by a council of terrorists..this council of terrorists is the "democratiqually" elected government that has set a cease fire with ur governement and in which it was broken by you government first when the made a raid on Gaza and killed nine of its inhabitants with ur usual shmata pretext of suspected weaopns being hidden..of course that caused hamas to answer by firing rockets and then ur government found its pretext to make the 2009 Gaza masacre
i can't say for sure hamas is the best political party for Gaza's citizens but that's their choice..exactly like america's choice was to elect bush twice despite his war mongring ..their choice also
You don't have the right to control Gaza, because the U.N security concil asked for immediate break of the bloackade ..now as a member of the U.N you should respect international descions that all other countries respect..your blockade has caused a human disaster and the whole world can see that while ur blinded apparently
You don't have the right to control Gaza because in the opinion of a lot of people israel is being governated with a counsil of terrorists itself yet no one blockaded you
your "so called" rightful bloackade is illegal and ur "so called" peaceful attempt to evacuate the activists is also illegal
because when i say illegal i mean in the terms of international law that all countries are supposed to respect not "ur view" of how the law should be
and answering ur claims the evacuation wasn't peaceful at all nor ur soldiers tried to make it be..the shooting with live emunation started before even the soldiers got down from the helicopter and continued after the soldiers landed and this is according to testmonies from the activistes themselves "not turkish nor arab by the way so that u don't consider it propagnada" it was according to an irish ,amercian and even one of the isralei parliment members that was on board of the marmara her name was hanin and all these testmonies were said live on CNN and the BBC "not an arab news channel"
and by the way having diversity in races in the parilement was never a sign of an unracist regime..it's the sign of a good propaganda but it becomes actuall democracy when u start listening to those other races and religion members demands
therefore it is not the Gaza citizen responsabilty to improve their lives when all u do is the exact opposite of protecting them with the always used so called pretext of terrorism ..maybe you start first by choosing better sane leaders for urselves.
Reply
(1 Reply)
:icontenshiru:
Tenshiru Featured By Owner Jun 4, 2010
I had a mishap in the first sentence, this is what I meant to write- "The Israeli soldiers did come to the flotilla, but with no intention to cause any harm to the civilians on the ship."

Whoopsy~
Reply
:iconsoberhigh:
SoberHigh Featured By Owner Jun 1, 2010
“Israeli acts that deprive Palestinians in the Gaza Strip of their means of subsistence, employment, housing and water, that deny their freedom of movement and their right to leave and enter their own country, that limit their rights to access a court of law and an effective remedy, could lead a competent court to find that the crime of persecution, a crime against humanity, has been committed.” The UN Fact Finding mission lead by South African Judge Richard Goldstone
Reply
Add a Comment:
 
×
  • Photo
Download JPG 900 × 1587




Details

Submitted on
May 31, 2010
Image Size
131 KB
Resolution
900×1587
Link
Thumb

Stats

Views
5,390
Favourites
33 (who?)
Comments
112
Downloads
117

License

Creative Commons License
Some rights reserved. This work is licensed under a
Creative Commons Attribution-Noncommercial-No Derivative Works 3.0 License.