Give Core MembershipI welcome comments as always, but would prefer them over there than over here.
palaeozoologist
Zach A.Andesaurus new version
65 Comments
Newest Deviations
Sauroposeidon painting
palaeozoologist
16
7
Sauroposeidon multiview skeletal
palaeozoologist
34
27
Euhelopus with raised shoulders
palaeozoologist
32
9
Euhelopus multiple-view skeletal reconstruction
palaeozoologist
24
20
Deinocheirus skeletal
palaeozoologist
50
3
Yi qi
palaeozoologist
35
2
Dreadnoughtus multiview skeletal
palaeozoologist
39
22
Rebbachisaurus skeletal
palaeozoologist
31
18
Limaysaurus skeletal
palaeozoologist
48
12
Amphicoelias dorsals comparison
palaeozoologist
18
7
Alamosaurus (in color)
palaeozoologist
47
9
Atlasaurus drawing
palaeozoologist
45
12
Alamosaurus (small scales)
palaeozoologist
22
2
Alamosaurus drawing with croc scales
palaeozoologist
25
3
Argentinosaurus skeletal
palaeozoologist
53
37
Alamosaurus skeletal
palaeozoologist
62
28
Favourites
The king
Dinomaniac
639
33
Brachiosaurus Sketch
Lythroversor
243
35
Talarurus, THE EMPEROR OF DINOSAURS
ZEGH8578
149
27
Ruyangosaurus giganteus schematic.
randomdinos
89
61
Playing with Genetics
Eurwentala
761
275
Daxiatian binglingi
yty2000
37
8
Nomor Condor
speciata
104
12
Island sauropods
Hyrotrioskjan
137
23
Island dinosaur size chart
Hyrotrioskjan
552
153
Shestakovo
Olorotitan
369
42
Sharipovo
Olorotitan
490
26
Titanosaur
Olorotitan
5,211
375
Olorotitan
Olorotitan
60
8
Elegant Golden Phoenix
pilsator
93
8
Europasaurus
Olorotitan
443
30
Spines, Thorns, and Spikes
Qilong
45
29
Activity
Due to recent new events, this hypothesis has come up again. My initial thoughts over at my (mostly dormant) blog, Part 1 of 2: palaeozoographer.wordpress.com…
I welcome comments as always, but would prefer them over there than over here.
I welcome comments as always, but would prefer them over there than over here.
deviantID
Comments
Your skeletal reconstructions have that rare organic quality that is so often lacking in scientific illustrations of their kind. Fantastic work.
Zach, I'm currently writing a paper on what I believe is a new Titanosaur (yay!) that I want to get published into PeerJ, and I need two reviewers. Would you like to be one? I've already come up with the name, entered it into Zoobank, and wrote out most of the paper's base already. The specimen isn't all too impressive, but I think it's worthy enough of a new genus. Besides, you could always end up being a co-author if it helps you get your name out there.
Unfortunately, I do not have a lot of spare time at present, so not sure I could provide a formal review, but if you intend to submit it to the preprints, I would be willing to make some short comments at that time. Same issue with co-authoring, unfortunately do not have much time for that either. It would depend on what exact kind of involvement would be needed.
