This content is intended for mature audiences.
or, enter your birth date.*
What is it that is so nasty about a woman's nipples? Men's nipples are fine. Dog's nipples are fine. Cows' nipples are fine. But women's nipples? Horrifying. The entire United States recoiled in terror at the sight of Janet Jackson's nipple on the superbowl halftime show last year. But if it had been Justin Timberlake's nipple, everyone would have thought he was just taking his shirt off because it was hot.
So, this image mixes things up a bit. It's NOT 'mature content' because the nipples in the picture are a man's. Specifically, they're the models' husband's. With the magic of photoshop I replaced her (very nice!) nipples with his (well, they look about the same, really, kind of, um, nipply!) hairy manly nipples. The photoshopped-on male nipples actually cover about as much as a nano-bikini would. I was careful to leave some of the hair around them, because if I had just done the nipple-swap nobody would have noticed it. Why? Because male nipples (which are OK for everyone to see) look almost EXACTLY like female nipples (which can cause your eyeballs to explode if you look at them when you're under the age of 18)!!
Now, if you all are VERY nice to me, I won't explore the obvious follow-on topic: why a dog's anus is not obscene, but...
(PS - The model [link] would like me to emphasize that her nipples are NOT furry.)
In europe, nudity is not really an issue.
the more a society is hypocritical to the nudity, more "pornzed" it became
Lol, And I thought she was from Europe w/ those hairy nipples haha! I know what u mean by mature
content! flicker's got that block w/ the b/w where u gotta click a few times to get to one picture,and not knowing, if the picture was even worth it!
I'm new here,and so far,so good!
Btw,I didn't like what I saw on her either lol
I have more interesting question. Why society and mainly men are so embarrassed by male nudity while they don't mind female nudity at all?
That's just a sexist remark. Look at any national geographic from a few years ago and you'll see hundreds of societies organised in exactly the same way and womens nipples everywhere.
The simple fact is womens breasts in many societies are associated with sex as much as if not more than mothering and they are considered far more intimate than mens.
Removing certain religions might help too though.
Of course, legs don't have that silly outrage associated with them as nipples. At least this is a USA-mostly phenomenon. Europe is a bit more sane: violence is worse than nudity there.
Me, I was brought up in a house full of males. I WANT to see a topless female without it being considered 'indecent'. Men should have to cover up their tops all the time and have it be considered 'indecent' when THEY strip. B<
sorry for the rant, I tend to enjoy getting into discussions like this^^
I recall the victorians used to hide womens' ankles - because they were sooooooOOO naughtee!! But today we see women displaying their ankles all the time and nobody's running around freaking out about it. I guess the question is "how much of this is learned behavior"?
Interestingly enough, in art, nudity has been greatly allowed, or was. During the renaissance period, the human body was accepted as a great work of art, and was treated as such. You were not a great artist unless you could capture the human body. However, culturally, both men and women had very strict rules about what could and could not be shown. Our culture has drastically changed and developed since then, going through various phases of tolerance and restriction, and nowadays, I'd say things have gotten a bit less stuffy about what should be shown or not shown, although people still react differently according to the gender of the person. Eventually, a time will come when such things are treated equally between the sexes, hopefully.