MadKingFroggy's avatar

Advocating For Real Violence Is Wrong

79 Favourites
23 Comments
482 Views
Just ought to make it clear that I'm not talking about people making fictional media that glorifies fictional violence. Grand Theft Auto, Mortal Combat and other such games and media are fine.

What I am talking about here is when people advocate for the actual use of violence or the killing of actual people in the real world. If you do that, then you are pure evil.
Fuck you. :^)

Violence against people is not okay
in anything other than immediate self defence as a last resort.
IMAGE DETAILS
Image size
100x55px 73.69 KB
Published:
© 2019 - 2020 MadKingFroggy
Comments23
anonymous's avatar
Join the community to add your comment. Already a deviant? Log In
Zheyno's avatar
You’re only here because of your ancestors willingness to be violent against others, are you calling your ancestors evil?

Thou haven’t you been enlightened that in order to create life, you must destroy life, as is the natural order.
LW97's avatar
LW97Hobbyist General Artist
I agree, but the most violent people I know are communist dictators, not Republicans
Integra789's avatar
wwwarea could you at least give me a chance to respond before blocking me like a coward?
wwwarea's avatar
There was a story about a prisoner named Paul Dixon who killed a person in prison for the act of molesting a child, and generally 98% of comments I've found so far was in favor of the person's inexcusable act including "JUSTICE" claims. You have no idea how furious I was, and how much I was yelling that these people are worse than most child molesters.
I think these people should be arrested because I'm pretty f***ing sure attitudes like this is what inspired certain prisoners and non-prisoners to go out and killed several sex offenders.
wwwarea's avatar

Maybe I shouldn't see anything wrong with people like you legally getting killed by the chair if legally possible for believing that LIVING BREATHING HUMANS who commits something not as bad a murdering a person should be dead and if your words promoted that.

wwwarea's avatar

You don't get it do you?. There is no excuse act on revenge. Period.

Criminals are still human beings therefor they still have basic natural rights founded by nature, and advocating violence toward a child molester who is trying to get rehabilitated is just as bad as advocating that toward any innocent person for any selfish personal reason. Some laws allow perversion like the death penalty for some crimes but that doesn't make it alright.


People who has already acted out on their desires resulting in death and/or non-death violence should be arrested and trialed like any other criminal though I think all prisons should be replaced with Norway's prison style.

Integra789's avatar
Okay, and?
wwwarea's avatar
Just to be more clear, I believe I was talking about comments who were praising the person that murdered the person. They were glorifying violence, and such thing was that the act was murdering someone.
RenewedEden's avatar
RenewedEdenHobbyist Traditional Artist
Thank you so much!
Greatkingrat88's avatar
I think it's wrong to make as categorical a statement as this. Violence should be a last resort, but there are situations, both real and theoretical, where advocating for and taking violent action is justified. Complete pacifism does not hold up to reality.
NightmarishWarlord's avatar
i believe there are only 3 justifiable reasons for killing people :

sadistic pleasure , revenge , and self defense
Greatkingrat88's avatar
Killing for pleasure is downright immoral, and revenge is understandable but not morally justifiable.
NightmarishWarlord's avatar
i think some of the best villains are the 1s with relatable motives , examples :

:icongodzillaplz::iconfreddykruegerplz::iconjasonvoorheesplz::iconleatherfaceplz::iconindominusrexplz::iconshredderplz:
MadKingFroggy's avatar
MadKingFroggyStudent General Artist
The thing is, I'm not saying it doesn't have it's place. I'm just saying that even if advocating it, people don't have to glorify it too.
Greatkingrat88's avatar
Well, your stamp said advocating for, not glorifying, right?
MadKingFroggy's avatar
MadKingFroggyStudent General Artist
It said "advocating for and glorifying". That little "and" is an important one.

For example, people who are advocating for the death penalty are at least coming from a good place, though I think a bit misguided. But at least they're not glorifying it. Often such people (those who are civil about it anyhow) treat it as a last resort.

This specific stamp is more aimed towards those who claim with joy how they'd love to kill (insert person or group here) and "bathe in their blood and tears". 

Hope that clears up any confusion.
Greatkingrat88's avatar
Yeah okay, that makes more sense. I think I missed that vital and.
ProjectLullaby's avatar
ProjectLullabyStudent Digital Artist
I don't know if there's any such thing as pure evil. They're just extremely misguided and need to be shown the right way to solve their problems. If you have a complaint then just talk to people, if your ideology is so entangled in violence then maybe it's time to leave it behind?
MadKingFroggy's avatar
MadKingFroggyStudent General Artist
If there isn't they're the closest thing to it imo.
These people clearly aren't even willing to talk about such things considering how quick they hide comments. 
Santa-Kruz's avatar
Santa-KruzHobbyist Artist
Violence and it's advocation will never stop. Some nations even persecute religious or ethnic minorities. 
MadKingFroggy's avatar
MadKingFroggyStudent General Artist
It will eventually but only if certain conditions are met. Globally all cultures need to embrace other means of conflict resolution, allow freedom and denounce the excessive restriction of freedom (which would include denouncing violence).
Unfortunately the way the world's going it'll take centuries or millennia, assuming we haven't already caused the extinction of humanity by that point.
anonymous's avatar
Join the community to add your comment. Already a deviant? Log In