Deviation Actions

Latuff2's avatar

Obama and Iran

By Latuff2
148 Favourites
Artwork originally produced for Iranian newspaper Jame-Jam.
High resolution version: [link]
Image details
Image size
734x600px 94.01 KB
Join the community to add your comment. Already a deviant? Log In
DAVIDE76's avatar
Bravissimo!Adoro i tuoi disegni!
TheBritWriter's avatar
Good art but highly pessimistic statement, I wonder where's the political art for the reaction of Obama pushing up the nuclear deal is? Being cynical isn't insightful. 
tappyFeet's avatar
i like the cards in his hands hahaha
octogone's avatar
Obama is no angel but, in the end, he's just a scapegoat for all the shit Bush has done to the world.
Valinakova's avatar
Although I am highly critical of Obama, because he has committed countless human rights violations which are comparable to what we define as "war crimes" I'd say that the fact that Romney lost is a relief.
Romney would have been more likely to get us into a war with Iran.
Freezerboi's avatar
Obama wouldn't actually do half of that, and if he did the news wouldn't tell anyone. I mean seriously, has anyone ever seen him do a shot of whiskey?
cyrus18's avatar
I wonder what does the poker chips represents
Pyromaniac97's avatar
I think you should ignore the people with negative comments.......why would someone ask if you support Al-Qaeda? Obama approved of the 'Search and Destroy' of Taliban insurgents and killed a lot of innocent people because of it.
Pyromaniac97's avatar
what are sanctions and embargo?
DeviantART789789's avatar
Iran is EVIL. And yes, it would be unrealistic to not have war as an option. Does Latuff support Al-Qaeda and 9/11?
zxcewq's avatar
Do you support the unwarranted invasion of Iraq under false pretences, and the slaughter of it's citizens?
DeviantART789789's avatar
No. No. And no. Saddam had to go. But the guy that the CIA used as evidence to invade Iraq, as it turns out, was lying about the WMDs. His codename was Curveball. And plus, the USA never wanted so many casualties to happen. It spiraled out of control. That's why I opposed the handling of the war. We should have had stricter Rules of Engagement, less incompetent leaders, and we should have gone to war for a different purpose: To end Saddam's oppressive regime and to bring Iraq it's first Democratic government. We couldn't have just stood by and watch Saddam kill those Shiites and Kurds after those 90s era rebellions. Now I have a question for you, would you want Saddam's oppressive regime to be allowed to continue, and did you support Iraq's invasion of Kuwait in 1991?
Fani66's avatar
Obama and Bush are War crminal and Terorist No. 1
AmnaelRBanner's avatar

No, a new war would cost to much for the americans, this they don't wanna try.^^
ArtistLimited's avatar
It is scary when our president says something like, "all options are on the table". What does that imply? That he is going to declare war on Iran?

I am voting for Obama in the upcoming election because he is the least "evil" of the candidates. However, any candidate if favorable if Obama does declare war.
KwikkiCat's avatar
AL-SiSTANi's avatar
there are no war with usa and iran
caz they making deals with shia
subtronik's avatar
Wow, we both dislike Obama.

I never thought I'd have anything in common with you.
Join the community to add your comment. Already a deviant? Log In