I strongly urge you to not only read the journal, but also the comments underneath it as there are a lot more examples of what you can and can't do as well as more links to information being shared by your fellow deviants!
I'll paraphrase/quote the wikipedia article on the topic for this:
"Copyright is a legal concept, enacted by most governments, giving the creator of an original work exclusive rightsSo, in short, if your work qualifies to be copyrighted and you live in a country that has signed the Berne Convention (you can see a list here), you do not have to do anything for your work to be copyright protected! That in turn means that you need to assume that EVERYTHING you see online is copyright protected as well! It also means that if you take someone else's work without having permission to do so, you're in violation of international copyright law.
to it, usually for a limited time. Generally, it is "the right to copy", but also gives the copyright holder the right to be credited for the work, to determine who may adapt the work to other forms, who may perform the work, who may financially benefit from it, and other, related rights. It is an intellectual property form (like the patent, the trademark, and the trade secret) applicable to any expressible form of an idea or information that is substantive and discrete.
Copyright may apply to a wide range of creative, intellectual, or artistic forms, or "works". Specifics vary by Jurisdiction, but these can include poems, theses, plays, other literary works, movies, dances, musical compositions, audio recordings, paintings, drawings, sculptures, photographs, software, radio and television broadcasts, and industrial designs. Graphic designs and industrial designs may have separate or overlapping laws applied to them in some jurisdictions.
Copyright laws are standardized somewhat through international conventions such as the Berne Convention and Universal Copyright Convention. These multilateral treaties have been ratified by nearly all countries, and international organizations such as the European Union or World Trade Organization require their member states to comply with them.
In all countries where the Berne Convention standards apply, copyright is automatic, and need not be obtained through official registration with any government office.
In 1989, the U.S. enacted the Berne Convention Implementation Act, amending the 1976 Copyright Act to conform to most of the provisions of the Berne Convention. As a result, the use of copyright notices has become optional to claim copyright, because the Berne Convention makes copyright automatic."
You can't use anything that you do not have permission to use!
There are different ways to obtain permission to use someone else's work.
1) Of course, you can always ASK someone for permission - send them a dA note, use a private message on a forum they frequent or simply e-mail them. But make sure you get permission for what you want to do, so in your request, outline your envisioned use! For example, ask them if it's okay to use it in a manip, but if you want to make the manip a print (on dA, redbubble, wherever) say so and ask permission for that as well! If you want to create something others can re-use later (such as premade backgrounds, brushes, journal layouts or whatever else) do make sure you ask specifically if that is okay! Just because someone is okay with you creating a personal piece of artwork doesn't mean they'll be thrilled to find their image redistributed in other forms or the artwork sold!
Remember, the copyright holder has the right to say NO & they have the right to be credited if they say yes!
It doesn't matter if you put work into it and it doesn't matter if it's "just for fun" and "no profit is made".
The same happens if you distribute premade stock, cut-outs, brushes etc without having permission from the original copyright holder! Not only are you doing something ilegal, you're also making others who trust in what they get to be legal stock your accomplices whose work will be taken down because of your infringement!
If you are a stocker, please recheck your sources - are the copyright holders really okay with you creating premades/brushes/cut-outs etc from their stock? Or are you maybe overstepping your legal bounds y using those images?
If you are a manipulator, please recheck your sources: are they really legitimate stock? Or do you have any doubts as to where they got their base images from? Personally, I'd only use cut-outs/premades/brushes etc where I have some indication of where they got their images from is a legitimate source ("all images used were taken by me" or similar sentences in the artist's comment always help to ease my mind, or seeing the originals in the stock artist's gallery etc) - because you have to ask yourself: is the stock really worth risking having your art taken down or being accused of stealing? Is it worth the trouble just for a nice background or an already cut out stock image?
Giving credit to someone who has no idea you just used his image is not the same as asking him for permission first. You can expect him/her to rip your head off if you have the guts to show him/her what you did. And if he finds out on his own, you shouldn't expect mercy either.
Saying that you don't own anything or adding the line "credit to the owners" is NOT a way to get around copyright laws! It doesn't relive you of your obligation to get permission. If you don't have permission, no amount of "credit" or saying that "nothing's mine, all belongs to whoever this belongs to" (do these people even hear what they sound like?!) will save you from the original creator's anger and/or law suit.
"Credit coming soon" is NOT credit at all. If you have time to upload, you need to make time to add credit. Or you are might just as well not have used legitimate stock to begin with.
As with all laws, there's room for interpretation in some gray areas (like the question what exactly qualifies for copyright in the first place and of course the whole field of "fair use"), but in my experience, if you want to keep your own life simple, you don't consider the what-ifs and the maybes but try to go for something straight forward to hold on to. Besides, some things - like the fact that credit alone isn't going to cut it if you don't have permission to go with your use first - are not debatable, no matter how much you'd like to think otherwise.
What you can always do though, is ask for permission - either when you're unsure if the person will allow what you have in mind or even when you know they have excluded your use in their rules. Just do yourself a favour and be polite about it.
For starters, say hello and use real words, no chat-speak. Use your real name when signing the note/e-mail/PM/etc. And think about why it has to be this image and not just any other that may be available without asking special permission. Saying something like "I know you don't allow it but I thought I'd ask anyway" will most likely put a frown on the stock provider's face and (s)he'll answer with "if you know that already, why do you ask?! The answer is still no." Feigning ignorance of the rules is also not a good idea, as what you'll get as an answer will most likely be something like "well, if you'd read my rules you'd know I don't allow this. The answer is no." So what are you supposed to do? You may have a chance if you outline what it is you're going to do and how your case might be special (for example it may be for a special purpose) or maybe you're willing to offer them something in return (for example a (smaller) copy of the finished work to include in their gallery/portfolio). Maybe it's for commercial use and you can offer some money and/or a copy of the book/cd you want to create the cover to etc. Remember to actually tell them about the project! Give them more than just "I want to use this for a book cover". Or maybe it's just because you fell in love with this particular image and don't want to make any money off it at all, just a chance to play with it for fun...
Just remember that the rules are usually there for a reason and for someone to break their own rules it may need a bit more than a blunt one-line request.
It's quite simple, really. If it breaks copyright law, it can't be DDed. It shouldn't be on deviantArt at all actually. The Community Volunteers with DD priviledges (see a list here) are all aware of deviantArt's Terms of Service & deviantArt's copyright policy as well as the fact that copyrighted material is a no-no (also see FAQ #157: Can I use things created by other people in my submissions? & FAQ #217: What are "Stock and Resources" and can I use them in my submissions?). But there certainly are galleries that have a bigger problem with this than others and the photomanipulation gallery is definitely one with a high risk of violations, simply because it's always hard to recognize original images used without permission after they've been blended with half a dozen others. You could always ask: is there credit missing? Or did that bit come from their private photo collection?
Personally, I hate always having to second-guess everything, so I've been using a practical approach to what I'll consider to DD that I hope you can see the merit of: I need to see stock credits for all images used so I can should I have doubts check the stock providers' galleries and check the original images (unless the stocker requires it in their rules, I personally don't need to see direct links to the images even though that of course makes it easier to check). Furthermore, if the person uses their own photos, then I need to see this stated somewhere! I just want o hear you say it, not because I like you to jump through hoops, but because it sets a positive example that credit is not going to diminish your work's worth, but it is an integral part of what a photomanipulator needs to consider. It's a fact that you won't be able to always get all images you need by shooting them yourself. There's no shame in accepting help there - but if you do, you need to follow the rules attached to this help.
NOTE: at the time of writing, I, kuschelirmel was a Community Volunteer and able to give DDs in the photomanipulation category. But since then I turned in my hat ^ and can no longer DD anything! Please use the list here to find out who is responsible today before sending a suggestion note
an article about what photomanipulation is and what you need to try it - and on the ever so important issue of "where do I get pictures to play with?"
--> read article <--
Of Copyright & Premades
is an article that strives to explain what copyright means, who it protects and that simply putting work into something will not make using something without permission okay.
A series of articles that try to explain some basics in art that you may or may not have heard of before but didn't know what to do with them. All of them are written especially for photo- manipulators, but the principles should hold true in any genre.
--> Know your basics - Colour Theory <--
--> Know your basics - Composition <--
--> Know your basics - Perspective <--
--> Know your basics - Textures <--
--> 01 | 02 | 03 | 04 | 05 <--
Artist Scam - there's a new one around!
Notre Dame, Improvements and Progress
Sneak Peak + Contest?
kuschelirmel - the art of Jasmin Junger
Credit alone doesn't cut it!"
This is perfect. There are always these beautiful image blends/manipulations that say, "credits in my faves", or "resources aren't mine". Or they say, "this is noncommercial so it doesn't matter," and they go using celebrity images because it's "just for fun." I really appreciate you making this journal! Thank you so much!
Sexual context and nude shots aren't the same. There are tons of uses for nude stock that do not involve actual sexual situations - sexual context I would see as being put into a pornographic setting, or used in inflation "art" or put a third boob on etc. I for one can see how someone would not want that, but is okay with everything else, including an erotic way of displaying the nude form. In the end of course the border between the two is dictated by taste and morals, but if you really want to do something you think they might have a problem with, you can always talk to them or simply use a different image.
But nude and sexual can be the same depending on points of view regardless of how the law or art determines it. As for pornographic I wouldn't be mentioning it here because it is not allowed full stop even if there are those who argue that porn is art
So the best possible thing is that if you can't determine whether your work will compromise those stock restrictions don't use it!