So intel is spending several millions on diversity on technology, that’s ok and all but, what the fuck they need Anita for?, what she’s suposedly gona do?, read the curriculums of aplicants and reject all the male ones?
Anyways i assume what they are gona actually do is Quotas. I have always been against quotas, they consist on hiring people based on their gender and race, and as far as i know that’s the fucking definition of inequality, it’s sexist and racist.
Aside of that, i don’t really think this is relevant to gamergate. Yes, it sucks that a fraud like Anita gets money from Intel, but in the end the money that woman makes or who Intel hires doesn’t have anything to do with us.
Pagina y descripcion en castellano kukuruyo.com/comic/gamergate-l…
I for one think minorities are much stronger and smarter than that.
"WE DON'T KNOW!"
"When do we want it?"
Also, dat hip sway.
The implication is that Sarkeesian has been given a crapton of money in order to push for diversity but hasn't specified how she will do it.
You would have known this if you used your brain. But that would imply that you actually have one.
And as for your other comment about me Writing fanfiction. Yeah,I do write fanfiction of Heartcore. And I do this because Tara and Stephen are my friends. Is this supposed to be a bad thing all of a sudden? That I make something for both myself and my friends to enjoy, especially considering our differences on the subject of Gamergate? If so, then you're a damn hypocrite considering how you featured Ame in your asspile of a comic called "Hunger Royale". Original Name, donut steel.
PS: Is being from Europe supposed to be bad? Also, how do you even know if KukuryuArt is rich or not? Got a view of his bankaccount or something?
When was fanfiction writing a good thing exactly?
And Hunger Royale wasn't a fanfiction it was an parody of Avengers Arena.
Wow. You're a jackass.
You're also skimming over the important fact that many political cartoons are often on the same papers and publications that publish the stories they are refering to. You know, so that the readers can get context to what they're looking at?
And when were making assesnine comics like yours supposed to be any good either, considering how moronic and eyescaring they are to look at? At least I try to put effort in my work, wich is more than what I can say for you!
And as for Battle Ga- Sorry, I meant Hunger Royale (amazing name, by the way, you unoriginal clown). Do you call that a parody? I'm sorry, but parodies are supposed to make people laugh, not make them want to die from boredom!
............... raise awareness!! Yeah! That way, we can feel like we've accomplished something important without doing any actual work!
Will they use that money directly to hire women and minorities exclusively? Will they launch ad campaigns aimed at enticing more women and minorities? The latter seems more probable, as you need all kinds of research and logistical crap to figure out the "best" way of achieving such an objective, and all that costs like hell. Perhaps they'll sponsor educational programs and courses?
Yeah, I agree completely with your take on quotas.
It's true that this isn't directly a #gamergate issue, but it is a tech issue. And FemFreq WILL take credit for whatever success the program might have or condemn Intel if DTI fails.
The idiots who say that this is somehow a blow against gamergate... well they're idiots
I mean you should always hire people who are qualified never eye candy because they're female
The problem arises if women have to be hired to fill hiring quotas - even if those women aren't as skilled as other applicants.
Trust me minorities and women who actually work really hate that!
or maybe it is a good thing because now that innovation can go elsewhere.
It was only when France bolstered it's military numbers and armaments that Hilter followed suit. From there Europe ushered in World War 2, but remember regional wars in Europe are a pretty common thing throughout history. Napoleon conquered all of Europe, twice (he was overthrown by oligarchs who feared his power and banished, his military went to pick him up and he returned and reconquered Europe), UK and France have historically been at war, France has regularly invaded and pillaged Italy.
Even World War 1 was winding down with Russian military deserting returning home, UK troops tired of fight and was going to the negotiation tables to decided who gets what (Germany the victor, was offering to return land to all parties). America only entered WW1 when the Media tricked America into entering the war with massive lies about attrocities after previously calling the Germans heroes. For this reason the US people didn't want to get involved in another one of Europe's wars (WW2) but the US government did and instigated the attack on Pearl Harbor (which the president knew was coming that day and move all the newer ships out to sea according to declassified documents) and attacked German ships prompting Hitler to declare war on America in retaliation.
As for Hitlers Crimes against humanity, most of the numbers from the camps have all been lowered, Auschwitz now only claims 1 million deaths total so there is 3 million off the record. But most of the people who died in the camps died from two causes. 1) Typhus a disease carried by ticks which until the 1940s was a death sentence and 2) Starvation when America bombed supply lines who were bringing food to the camps. In fact if you look at records, uncontested records btw inmates at the camps ate as well as the average German until the end of the war.
Like the Nazis or not (Original Nazis not Neo Nazis today, they're just racist pieces of shit and please do hate them), most of what is said about the original Nazis is post war propaganda to cover up the millions upon millions America and the UK killed. America fire bombed Dresdon, starved Greeks, and after the war carried out a campaign of genocide against the German people. Hense why American needed to push Hitler is Satan narrative.
Remember: History is written by the victors, History is full of liars.
Did other nations do terrible things during the war? Yes, but the Axis was far worse and more consistent in their horrors. I've heard all the conspiracy theories about the Holocaust being faked before, and I encourage you to actually visit the sites of the concentration camps before making such claims.
Hitler didn't attempt to establish Gun Free Zones. It is a popular myth that he implemented Gun Control when Gun Controll was implement by the Allies after WW1 against Germans in theTreaty of Versailles, the German legislature in 1919 passed a law that effectively banned all private firearm possession. While gun ownership was restored in 1928 it wasn't until Hitler passed a law in 1938 that gun sales and ownership returned to a deregulated state. Legal age of ownership was also lowered from 20 to 18. The law did famously strip gun ownership from communists (who at this point had already killed over 20 million in the Soviet Union, these people were psychopaths) and Jews who had lost favor-ability in Germany post WW1 (I won't cover the reasons, but Google Balfour Declaration). Other than these two groups the average German continued to enjoy Gun Ownership Rights just fine, so if Hitler was such a "tyrant" why did he increase the average German's capacity to won guns?
What Hitler asked for is akin to Nuclear disarmament today, a limitation on weapons of war.
As for going there, you should revisit, their official plaques have all changed to represent the newer much lower numbers. But if you want to see some real horrors go check out the Labor Camps in Russia where more than double the highest estimates of Nazi death camps occurred. Where men and women were starved to death, worked to death, or left to freeze to death. Or perhaps you'll like Mao's China, 40 million dead (estimates also go as high as 50-70 million). Fact of the matter is that Communist have killed vastly more than Hitler did, but you don't really see support of those victims from people like yourself or even acknowledgement of these atrocities. What gives about that?
with all due respects.