Literature
i despise me a floggin watermark (but not only me)
if you post-process, beyond a cosmetic degree,
AI imagery that you've prompted,
feel content to use a watermark as desired
(as much as i and others consider them
unprofessional when gracing not-for-sale work);
should post-processing, however,
consist of only cosmetic alteration,
please leave off with the watermark..
too much of the species remains in such work,
and they deserve to witness that unbesmirched
imposition?:
#ImageNaziAtLargeBeginFlameWar
moar likely:
#ImageNaziPokesRemainInsufficientToStirHornetsFromSleep
the unmentioned implication of the above is that
AI images blessed by no more than cosmetic alteration
should not only persist sans watermark,
but shouldn't even be up for sale
#PokePokePokePokeZZZZZ
notwithstanding lethargy, persistently remaining:
CAMP resist-most-urges-to-non-cosmetically-alter-AI-imagery
#TheBlackBoxSuffices
VS.
CAMP i-am-artiste-and-do-as-i-please-TYVM
#SpeciesHathNothingOverMe
tony said "dayam"
camus said "provocation seems to have
