Suggested Collections
You Might Like . . .
Myself for You
By jsrgomez
This Lego work is named "Yellow"
The Art of the Brick Exhibit by Nathan Sawaya
The posting of this photo has approval from Mr. Nathan Sawaya, and the photo is owned and taken by myself.
The Art of the Brick Exhibit by Nathan Sawaya
The posting of this photo has approval from Mr. Nathan Sawaya, and the photo is owned and taken by myself.
Image details
Image size
4928x3264px 7.92 MB
Make
NIKON CORPORATION
Model
NIKON D7000
Shutter Speed
10/300 second
Aperture
F/3.5
Focal Length
18 mm
ISO Speed
1000
Date Taken
Dec 29, 2012, 7:43:01 AM
Published:
© 2013 - 2021 jsrgomez
Comments126
Join the community to add your comment. Already a deviant? Log In
When you literally open yourself up to the world XD
That's a pretty cool Lego statue, btw.
That's a pretty cool Lego statue, btw.
Awesome! I'm just glad they are yellow bricks instead of red.
Amazing and creative!
@ Skelly-Bone: Valid reply, except before you say stuff like that, perhaps you should think about the value of photography when you're taking a picture of someone else's work.
hi Guys! just read the comments. Yeah this is my shot and I took it myself. Just see the camera data if you don't want to believe. And I also posted it in the link attached by one of the comments.
I just want to be anonymous in that blog but now it was all revealed that I own that blog. hahaha!
I just want to be anonymous in that blog but now it was all revealed that I own that blog. hahaha!
so cool!
you mean lego!
that is so freaking amazing.
thats awesome 
People he didn't steel this. He took a photograph of it, people do it all the time and do people b*tch about it? No.
hi Guys! just read the comments. Yeah this is my shot and I took it myself. Just see the camera data if you don't want to believe. And I also posted it in the link attached by one of the comments.
I just want to be anonymous in that blog but now it was all revealed that I own that blog. hahaha!
I just want to be anonymous in that blog but now it was all revealed that I own that blog. hahaha!
FAQ #306: Does "Crediting" let me use whatever I want? FAQ #157: Can I use things created by other people in my submissions?
He still can't post it.
He still can't post it.
"The posting of this photo has approval from Mr. Nathan Sawaya"
Thinking that Mr. Nathan Sawaya is the maker of this, he'd be allowed to because he hasn't only credited, but has been given permission to.
Thinking that Mr. Nathan Sawaya is the maker of this, he'd be allowed to because he hasn't only credited, but has been given permission to.
Yes, and when I originally commented on it in January, that wasn't there.
True true.
why is everyone busting a nut on this dude? o.o if he wrote were it's from and who the artist is i don't see it as a problem at all. Giving credit atleast eh either way this is pretty epic
Because it's DEVIANTART --> A SITE WHERE YOU POST YOUR OWN ART.
It's true, it's great art, seriously terrific, but what's the point in making a 'photography' section at all if all you're going to do is take pictures of other people's work? And to then give it a new name and everything. The least he could do, out of respect, is give it the name given by the maker and the maker's name beside it. And then in the description maybe post something about 'using this for my blog' or whatever. Not take credit for the fact that he took a picture of someone else's work. Whoopediedoo, so what now if I take a picture of déjeuner sur l'herbe and post it on deviantart I can be credited for my amazing photography skills? You can find millions of pictures of this on google if you're interested.
THAT is why people are busting a nut on this dude.
It's true, it's great art, seriously terrific, but what's the point in making a 'photography' section at all if all you're going to do is take pictures of other people's work? And to then give it a new name and everything. The least he could do, out of respect, is give it the name given by the maker and the maker's name beside it. And then in the description maybe post something about 'using this for my blog' or whatever. Not take credit for the fact that he took a picture of someone else's work. Whoopediedoo, so what now if I take a picture of déjeuner sur l'herbe and post it on deviantart I can be credited for my amazing photography skills? You can find millions of pictures of this on google if you're interested.
THAT is why people are busting a nut on this dude.
Amazing, good Job!
Even though you posted who made it in the description, posting something like this just devalues what other DA users see of you.
He could have taken the photo, or not.
Here's a very similar photo from a blog post: [link]
I don't know how to confirm whether or not these photos are the same (pixels? editing? What), but there are other photos in his gallery that are similar/same as the ones on the same blog post.
Here's a very similar photo from a blog post: [link]
I don't know how to confirm whether or not these photos are the same (pixels? editing? What), but there are other photos in his gallery that are similar/same as the ones on the same blog post.
hi Guys! just read the comments. Yeah this is my shot and I took it myself. Just see the camera data if you don't want to believe. And I also posted it in the link attached by one of the comments.
I just want to be anonymous in that blog but now it was all revealed that I own that blog. hahaha!
I just want to be anonymous in that blog but now it was all revealed that I own that blog. hahaha!
ooh woops...Sorry man, I got a little too excited snooping around, heh.
Thanks for replying
. Your photos are wonderful.
Thanks for replying
. Your photos are wonderful.
They're the exact same.
After comparing the two closely, yes I believe they are the same as well.
But now I think he owns that blog. In one photo in his gallery, "Wanderer" ([link]) was sumbitted in October 2012. In the blog, the same photo (same title) was posted on December 2012.
Here, the blog photo was posted 6 days ago.
But now I think he owns that blog. In one photo in his gallery, "Wanderer" ([link]) was sumbitted in October 2012. In the blog, the same photo (same title) was posted on December 2012.
Here, the blog photo was posted 6 days ago.
Join the community to add your comment. Already a deviant? Log In