Shop Forum More Submit  Join Login
Great Lakes Earth Map by Jdailey1991 Great Lakes Earth Map by Jdailey1991
Map by :icondinospain:, with a snippet of :iconlatexiana:'s lakes.



Dark brown=mountains. Light brown=uplifts. Black=Igneous provinces still visible today at their original extent with no consideration of erosion.




Let us say that, in the future, some scientists have created satellites capable of something that seems science fiction for now — punching the walls of the universe to study an alternate reality. By that scenario, some hundreds of “alternate Earths” from hundreds of alternate universes would already have been discovered and meticulously studied. As much as half of them would still be ruled by humans, unfolded by events that turned out differently. One universe, for example, had an Earth where 9/11 never happened, or where the outcome of the Revolutionary and Civil Wars ended up differently.

One of the most interesting to note was a planet that scientists call “Alternate Earth 111”, known to the public as “Great Lakes Earth”.

Why?

Because at first glance, it seemed that almost every continent is dominated by lakes, even those larger than the Great Lakes that we have in North America.


The Americas
The Appalachian Range used to exist, but all that remains nowadays are their metamorphic bedrocks. Since then, the Atlantic Coast is a labyrinth of islands, straits, channels and sounds, making New England the eastern equivalent of the Inside Passage, caused by five million years of being repeatedly scraped and bulldozed by ice. The terrain is not quite dramatic, the tallest above sea level being only 122.2 feet (37.25 meters.)

While our Rockies stand no taller than 14,440 feet above sea level, the tallest peak in a Great Lakes Rockies is measured to be 20,310 feet. Back home, our Rockies formed between 80 and 55 million years ago through the Laramide Orogeny, the subduction of the North American and Pacific plates at a shallow angle. Their Rockies first formed 55 million years ago as the result of a collision between eastern and western North America. They stopped becoming active as recently as nine million years ago. Since then, a series of faulting had shed off the mountains’ sedimentary skin and exposed the tougher granite-and-gneiss core. No wonder, then, that transdimensional explorer Mark Greene called the Great Lakes Earth Rockies “a single, continuous spine of breathtaking Tetons.” West of the Rockies stands an uplift varying in elevation above sea level between 2,000 and 13,000 feet (between 610 and 3962 meters.)

Minor differences in geological history could create major differences in geographical shape. Without the Cascades or the Alaska Range, the distinctively whiplike Alaskan Peninsula simply does not exist. The area we’d recognize as San Andreas (Baja Peninsula and southwestern California) is fused into what we’d call southeastern Alaska. Evidence in the rocks beneath the soil shows that San Andreas did indeed collide with Alaska only 24 million years ago, but the mountain-building period did not last long, and the peaks were reduced into quarter-mile-tall hills.

The Black Hills of South Dakota don’t exist on Great Lakes Earth. The Ozarks, larger in area and elevation than back home, are the closest analogy. The tallest stands 7242 feet (2207 meters) above sea level. They started life as a dome of granite that, over millions of years, had been replenished with fresh supplies of magma. This allowed the crystals that made the granite dramatically larger, making the rock itself a lot harder. After 2.2 billion years under the surface, the dome popped above sea level only as recently as 20 million years ago. Even though rain and river played a part in carving the dome into numerous spires, pillars and gorges, the real player in shaping the Ozarks is lower air pressure, exfoliating the surface into pieces like layers of onions.

True to the spirit of the planet’s name, North America is full of large lakes. The largest of which is Agassiz. In fact, it is the cornerstone of all of Great Lakes Earth’s great lakes — enormous depressions, tectonic rifts or volcanic calderas reshaped and filled in by ice, rain and river. To have an idea on the shape, size and scope of Agassiz, we must look at the familiar faces of the Great Lakes — Superior, Michigan, Huron, Erie and Ontario — and then flood off the entire basin. This is Lake Agassiz, 95,000 square miles and 5500 feet at its deepest. Agassiz started out as a series of rifts and faults that failed to split the continent. The valley wouldn’t become a lake until the ice bulldozed the depressions during the Pleistocene glaciations.

West of the Rockies, there are even more lakes—Bonneville, Carson, Olympia, Hamilton and Red Deer. All of them formed separately late during the Cenozoic as tectonic weaknesses sank the land, sometimes to the point below sea level. Further shaping the lakes were the last five million years of ice ages strengthening and weakening the freeze-thaw cycles. As a result, not only do they have their distinctive shapes, they are also deep. Bonneville, the deepest, is currently over a thousand feet deep.

What we’d presume to be the Brooks Range in northern Alaska actually isn’t. The Murchison Mountains, as we call them, are actually volcanic peaks standing 14,411 feet (4392 meters) above sea level at the tallest. They stand at one of the points where the Arctic Plate sinks beneath the Laurasian Plate.

The Yellowstone mantle plume is still present. Except that instead of Wyoming’s northwestern corner, it can be found in northeastern California. The upland itself covers an area of 5,000 square miles and stands almost like an island between the surrounding lakes and lowlands.

Five million years ago, the oceanic Panamanian Plate had been invaded on both fronts—by the Caribbean Plate in the northeast and the Pacific Plate in the southwest. This uplifted the basaltic slab to above sea level and had volcanoes guarding the plateau. The Twins, as they are called, are still active. One twin is currently 6,684 feet above sea level, the other 9,698 feet. Curiously, the Twins make up the coastline of Central America on Great Lakes Earth, which makes sense considering their young age. What doesn’t make sense is how they could be so tall in so short a time. The same problem is said of the Andes, which also make up South America’s entire western coastline. But if we look at a bathymetrical map, we start to understand why—from Argentina to Guatemala, the Pacific Plate is paralleled by the younger, narrower Nazca Plate. It first formed only ten million years ago and uplifted the Andean coastline for five million years before reaching the Panamanian Plate. This double-subduction may explain why the Andes, 25,122 feet above sea level and still rising, as they have been for the last 45 million years, had such devastating eruptions in the last 10,000 years, with an average of one eruption measuring eight on the VEI every thousand years.


Questions follow:

  • Are these changes enough to spare northeastern Nebraska from the onslaught of Tornado Alley without sacrificing the Midwest’s prairie fertility in the process?
  • Will all these lakes and rivers (not pictured) turn the Wild West into a greener Eden?
  • How much of the Amazon Basin will still be rainforest?


Eurasia
Physically absent in the supercontinent are Turkey, Iran, and the Low Countries (Belgium, Netherlands, Luxemburg and Denmark). Back home, Scandinavia is one of Earth’s recognizable peninsulas. On Great Lakes Earth, the body we’d recognize as the Baltic Sea is actually known as the Baltic Plain.

The dominating feature of Asia is a large region of basaltic rock, the Siberian Traps. It formed as a series of eruptions spewed out lava 60 to 43 million years ago. Since most of northern Asia was a receding series of shallow seas at the time, the eruptions resulted in all four compositions of lava—low on both gas and viscosity, high on gas but low on viscosity, low on gas but high on viscosity and high on both gas and viscosity. However, 96% of those eruptions happened underwater, so they wouldn't react exactly like they would on land. Each eruption could last anywhere between 10,000 and 60,000 years, with breaks varying between 30,000 and 80,000 years. When the last eruption had finished, seven million square miles of Eurasia were buried under four million cubic miles of lava.

Eurasia is subject to Great Lakes Earth’s largest sea, one that we used to have back home — the Tethys. Back home, the Mediterranean has an average depth of 1500 meters and a maximum of 5267. The Tethys’ depth is 1205 meters on average and 7,000 maximum. Even so, the ratio between deep and shallow water is remarkably similar to that of the Mediterranean — more or less than 45% of the sea is no deeper than 200 meters (the required maximum depth for a sea to be “shallow”). It’s also connected to two oceans with two different personalities — the Indian to the east and the Atlantic to the west. What we’d recognize as the Arabian Peninsula is, on Great Lakes Earth, an extension of northeastern Africa, erasing both the Red Sea and the Gulf of Aden out of existence. This further widens the passage from the Indian Ocean to the Tethys.

The island of Newfoundland is the southeastern extension of Iceland. It stands at a point where a stationary mantle plume, loaded with silicon, stands at a crossroads between the Mid-Atlantic Ridge and the edge of the Arctic Plate. Unlike our Iceland, in which the Ridge has split it in east-west, the Iceland of Great Lakes Earth is split in a north-south division.

In Asia, what looks to us like Borneo is a big extension of eastern India, erasing the Bay of Bengal from the map. Sumatra is an extension of India’s western coast. The rest of Indonesia, as well as the island chain of the Philippines and the Malay Peninsula, don’t exist.

Back home, the Himalayan range in Asia is impressive enough. On Great Lakes Earth, they are even more so. The highest peak, Kailash, stands 33,500 feet (10,210.8 meters) above sea level and still rising. If the base of Mauna Kea in Hawaii were above sea level, this would have been its equal. Their Himalayas are older than ours, if the differences in height suggest anything. Ours first formed 50 million years ago. Theirs rose from the plains between 65 and 70 million years ago.

65 million years ago, sub-Himalayan Asia was subject to a series of lava eruptions lasting a total of 30,000 years. When it was all over, the lava covered a thickness exceeding one mile, an area of one-and-a-half million square miles and a volume greater than one million cubic miles.

The islands of Japan on Great Lakes Earth are the result of multiple faults and subductive hot spots, stationary mantle plumes standing in the intersections of colliding plates. Japan, consisting of six large hotspots, stands three miles southeast of the Laurasian Plate and five northwest of the Pacific Plate. The fact that the mountains make up the coastlines suggest that Japan on Great Lakes Earth formed very recently—no longer, it’s been surmised, than 11 million years. Like the Andes, Japan was subject to massive, earth-destroying eruptions.

The Alps remain tall, as they are back home. However, they are formed as the result of a piece of Africa, known to us as Balk, colliding with southeastern Europe 40 million years ago. Currently, the range’s highest peak, Olympus, stands 22,838 feet (6961 meters) above sea level and is still rising. Behind the Alps is a plateau that covers lands we’d recognize as Romania, Moldova, Slovenia, Austria, Slovakia and Hungary. Also, Balk’s terrain on Great Lakes Earth consists of plains and hills rather than mountain ranges like back home.

The Scandes, stretching the length of the northern Scandinavian coast, are the results of ocean/continent collisions — volcanoes. They are also taller than they are back home — 18,510 feet (5642 meters) above sea level and still rising.

The Ural, Caucasus, Pyrenees and Apennine mountain chains used to exist on Great Lakes Earth, but not anymore.

Questions follow:

  • With open connections to both the Indian and the Atlantic, what would the Tethys’s personality be?
  • Will a higher Himalayas — which means a higher Tibetan Plateau — pose any noticeable differences on India’s climate, precipitation and landscape?
  • Would adding Borneo and Sumatra pose any difference to the climate and landscape of the Indian subcontinent?
  • With the rest of Indonesia, the Philippines and the Malay Peninsula out of existence, how would this absence affect ocean currents?
  • How would all this added water affect the Mediterranean Basin as well as the Indian monsoon?
  • Concerning the Siberian Traps, 40 million years of erosion would mean an altogether different Russian landscape, no doubt, but to what extent? Would we still see vast, singular bands of boreal forests and steppes, or would we expect to see Russia hosting a wider variety of habitats?
  • Would a larger Deccan Traps pose any difference to the 65 million years of erosion?
  • How would the changes in mountain building and coastlining affect the climate and landscape of the rest of Europe?


Africa
Like some of the other continents, Africa has its share of great lakes — Chad, Congo and Makgadikgadi. Lake Makgadikgadi, the southernmost, is also the youngest—100 feet (30 meters) at the deepest and formed as water flowing from the Aden Bahçesi inundated a series of fault lines only three million years ago.

The Atlas Mountains used to exist on Great Lakes Earth, but not anymore.

The defining mountain range of Africa is the Aden Bahçesi, which first formed 45 million years ago as the Indian Plate sank beneath the African Plate. Currently, the tallest peak stands 21,810 feet (6647.7 meters) above sea level and still rising.

Lakes Chad and Congo had a shared history. They originated less than 200 million years ago as a series of horsts and grabens that would quickly be inundated aftewards. It wasn’t until 80 million years ago, when the seafloor slowed down and sea levels began to recede, that perhaps the deepest points on Great Lakes Earth during the Cretaceous period became surrounded by dry land. In time, freshwater diluted the lakes, pushing the salinity deeper and deeper. Today, Lake Congo to the south averages 221 meters deep, with a maximum of 2001 meters, the bottommost 15 feet being brine. Lake Chad to the north has an average depth of 337.5 meters with a maximum of 3791 meters, with the Pharaoh’s Brine taking up the bottom 20 meters.

Questions follow:

  • Are any of these changes enough to turn North and South Africa from desert to more verdant habitat, like savanna?
  • Would having a tropical megalake be enough to make a noticeable difference to the equatorial climate of the Congo rainforest?


Australia
First and foremost, it’s not called “Australia” in Great Lakes Earth, but rather “Sahul”. The first major difference is the presence of Lake Eyre, a body of fresh water over 460,000 square miles in area and 49 meters at the deepest.

The northern and eastern coasts of Sahul are worth noticing. To the northwest, it looks as though the two main islands of New Zealand are glued into the mainland. It’d also look as though someone were shoving the island of New Guinea down the throat of mainland Australia, known geographically as the Gulf of Carpentaria. The northern and eastern extremes of Sahul are defined by volcanic mountains, the tallest standing 18,500 feet above sea level.

The final difference is that Sahul is much further south than Australia. So much so, in fact, that by comparison, the distance between it and Antarctica is cut by half.

Questions follow:

  • Will the Outback still be desert?
  • In the same scenario, Indonesia and the Philippines don’t exist. What kind of ocean current(s) would one expect to see influencing Sahul?
  • What kind of climatic and ecological influences would we expect Lake Eyre and the continent’s closer proximity to Antarctica to create?


Pole to Pole
Compared to our oceans, the Arctic Ocean of Great Lakes Earth seems to have a little elbow room. The reason — the Atlantic on Great Lakes Earth is wider than ours by over 1350 miles. Africa, Eurasia and Sahul have, compared to our Old World, moved that far eastward, creating a landbridge that connects Asia to North America, erasing the Bering Strait off the map and shrinking the Bering Sea. To that extent, it would be like turning the Russian urban locality of Egvekinot (66.3205 degrees North and 179.1184 degrees West) into the next-door neighbor of Teller, Alaska. But that is in our eyes only. On Great Lakes Earth, North America has always been a part of Laurasia for 250 million years.

The island of Greenland looks, to us, rearranged to the extent that Mont Forel, the island’s highest peak, is located in 90 degrees North — the North Geographic Pole.

There is another difference, one that applies also to the Southern Ocean surrounding Antarctica. Back home, the Arctic’s average depth is only 1205 meters, whereas its deepest point is 5,625 meters. The Southern Ocean averages 4,000 meters deep and has a maximum depth of 7,235. On Great Lakes Earth, the Arctic averages 663 meters deep with a maximum of 7235 meters, whereas the Southern Ocean averages 2212 meters deep with a maximum depth of 5625 meters.

Then, of course, there is the Arctic Plate, something that doesn’t exist back home. Horizontally cutting Iceland in half, we can find the border straddling the coasts of Baffin Island, Alaska, and Scandinavia, creating the Scandes and the Murchison mountains.

Questions follow:

  • How would these differences affect ocean currents and polar landscapes?
  • Could any of these changes have influenced the global average temperature and precipitation? If so, to what extent?


Ocean Deep
Back home, the Pacific Ocean, the largest of the five, has an average depth of 4028 meters and a maximum of 10,924 meters. On Great Lakes Earth, the Pacific’s depth averages 2025 meters  and the maximum is now 8486 meters.

Back home, the Indian Ocean averages around 3963 meters deep with a maximum depth of 7258. On Great Lakes Earth, the Indian Ocean averages around 1467 meters deep and has a maximum depth of 7906 meters.

The Atlantic Ocean back home has an average depth of 3926 meters and a maximum of 8605 meters. On Great Lakes Earth, its average depth is now 1725 meters, and the maximum is now 10,911 meters, the same as the Pacific.

Questions follow:

  • How would the changes in depth affect ocean currents, therefore the global climate?
Add a Comment:
 
:iconhistoryredone:
HistoryRedone Featured By Owner Nov 16, 2018  Hobbyist General Artist
Here are my answers (in the following comments):
Reply
:iconhistoryredone:
HistoryRedone Featured By Owner Nov 16, 2018  Hobbyist General Artist
Ocean deep
• How would the changes in depth affect ocean currents, therefore the global climate?
This alters my earlier assessments about the planet's temperature. Less deep overall oceans warm up more easily, and thereby possibly increasing the overall temperature. However, it would also, combined with the stronger cold of the poles, increase the strength of the figure-8 jet current, and as such, increase the natural violence experienced on the planet as a whole.
Reply
:iconhistoryredone:
HistoryRedone Featured By Owner Nov 16, 2018  Hobbyist General Artist
Pole to pole
• How would these differences affect ocean currents and polar landscapes?
The shallow of the Arctic Sea only reinforces the effect it has on the northern jet current, and as such probably also having a thick ice sheet on top. It would also effectively speed up the great figure-8 current, thereby increasing the effect of it on the world as a whole.
• Could any of these changes have influenced the global average temperature and precipitation? If so, to what extent?
Due to the thick ice sheets, more radiation would be reflected back into space, thereby lowering the entire planet's temperature by a few degrees. As for precipitation, it would be aiding the increase that is already strengthened by the above mentioned points.
Reply
:iconhistoryredone:
HistoryRedone Featured By Owner Nov 16, 2018  Hobbyist General Artist
Australia
• Will the Outback still be desert?
I consider that probable. However, it would be Moore akin to the Gobi desert, given that it would not only be colder due to its proximity to the south pole, but also due to the cold jet current that comes from the southeast, and passes by the bottom of the continent.
• In the same scenario, Indonesia and the Philippines don’t exist. What kind of ocean current(s) would one expect to see influencing Sahul?
I answered this one previously: the great figure-8 jet current.
• What kind of climatic and ecological influences would we expect Lake Eyre and the continent’s closer proximity to Antarctica to create?
Besides the above named changes, I foresee that where our Australia has tropical rainforests, this one might have more temperate forests. Though, given the lake's shallowness, I foresee that the levels would be strongly fluctuating, with great size differences, probable ice covering in the winter, and huge marshland around it. It might also be possible for the lake to follow the fate of the Aral lake, and shrink until it vanishes completely, which would immensely change the continent's ecosystem.
Reply
:iconhistoryredone:
HistoryRedone Featured By Owner Nov 16, 2018  Hobbyist General Artist
Africa
• Are any of these changes enough to turn North and South Africa from desert to more verdant habitat, like savanna?
North Africa would be more temperate, as it is also hit with the hurricanes, created from warm Amazon air and the Atlantic jet stream. There might be some smaller deserts, but nothing on the Sahara's scale.
South Africa would be a rainforest, as the mountains form a basin in which warm air from the equator can be collected and love southward.
• Would having a tropical megalake be enough to make a noticeable difference to the equatorial climate of the Congo rainforest?
I think the lake might be of less effect than the ocean and wind currents
Reply
:iconhistoryredone:
HistoryRedone Featured By Owner Nov 16, 2018  Hobbyist General Artist
Eurasia
Note beforehand: the Black and Caspian Seas would have different shorelines. Vastly different. Also, so would Gibraltar. As it would be open to the Indian Ocean, the Mediterranean would be like a funnel for Oceanic currents, wearing down at their coasts.

• With open connections to both the Indian and the Atlantic, what would the Tethys’s personality be?
It would be a funnel for the warm air of the Indian to go north through. It would create fertile first areas in what we call the Ukrainian steppes. Also, Italy would probably have more storms, as it forms a wedge in the currents, and would be the meeting ground for the hot and colds air. Thetys would be a varied sea, causing warm storms on one side, and temperate prosperity on the other.
• Will a higher Himalayas — which means a higher Tibetan Plateau — pose any noticeable differences on India’s climate, precipitation and landscape?
It would rejuvenate the lava-ridden plains quickly. The monsoon would be very similar, as the added height would change little to the existing situation. The clouds would still be blocked, and cause the monsoon.
• Would adding Borneo and Sumatra pose any difference to the climate and landscape of the Indian subcontinent?
Not very much. The greatest difference would be to the sea currents.
• With the rest of Indonesia, the Philippines and the Malay Peninsula out of existence, how would this absence affect ocean currents?
It might result in a jet current going from the Indian to the Pacific Ocean. I foresee a massive figure 8, looping around Africa and Oceania, and crossing in the Indian Ocean.
• How would all this added water affect the Mediterranean Basin as well as the Indian monsoon?
Slightly. But I already covered this in previous answers.
• Concerning the Siberian Traps, 40 million years of erosion would mean an altogether different Russian landscape, no doubt, but to what extent? Would we still see vast, singular bands of boreal forests and steppes, or would we expect to see Russia hosting a wider variety of habitats?
I think they might. Especially with the Ural mountains gone, there would be an open stretch from the Baltic plains to Kamshatka. Though I fear I cannot give more of an answer.
• Would a larger Deccan Traps pose any difference to the 65 million years of erosion?
Maybe slightly, but especially given the already great changes, not dramatically.
• How would the changes in mountain building and coastlining affect the climate and landscape of the rest of Europe?
As said previously, forests in Ukraine, Italy would be more extreme, but what I am surprised about is the cut of the Low Countries. Erode them away, sure. But just this cutting out? Highly unlikely. I would expect more of a flowing delta, with colder marshes and a slightly more Arctic-ish climate. This because the thetys would destroy the jet stream that gives northwest Europe is temperate climate.
Reply
:iconhistoryredone:
HistoryRedone Featured By Owner Nov 16, 2018  Hobbyist General Artist
America
• Are these changes enough to spare northeastern Nebraska from the onslaught of Tornado Alley without sacrificing the Midwest’s prairie fertility in the process?
Little information is given in the Caribbean, which form the main origin of the tornados. However, we can say that they would be less, and at a different angle, as the Andes stretch out deeply into Venezuela, thereby blocking the warm, equatorial winds going north, and potentially even redirecting them towards Africa. But that would depend on the polar changes. We read on.
• Will all these lakes and rivers (not pictured) turn the Wild West into a greener Eden?
Yes. Though not solely due to the water, but also due to the Pacific warmth. It would be a lot more temperate, but El Niño would be visiting there more often, also due to the height of the Andes.
• How much of the Amazon Basin will still be rainforest?
Most of it, if not more. The new mountains form a wonderful catching glove for warm air to simmer, and Atlantic rain to collect, condensing against the impassable Andes
Reply
:iconason7292:
ason7292 Featured By Owner Aug 15, 2018  Hobbyist Photographer
Let me start by saying that this is FASCINATING and very well thought out. I want to give my opinion on a few of your questions:

  • Will all these lakes and rivers (not pictured) turn the Wild West into a greener Eden?
I think that the main cause for the arid conditions of the current American West is the rain shadow caused by the Cascades and the Sierra Nevada plateau. You say that in this Earth the Cascades don't exist. In that case I would wager that the west would have a climate more similar to Seattle or San Fran, though probably not as wet. Seattle gets rained on all the time because the Cascades force warm Pacific air up, where it dumps its water onto Seattle. The dry air then moves over the Cascades and into the West, which is then arid. Without the Cascades you wouldn't have that rain shadow effect, so I think the warm moist Pacific air would just steadily dump water throughout the West. In short it's not the lakes and rivers, it's the absences of mountains doing the trick.

  • With open connections to both the Indian and the Atlantic, what would the Tethys’s personality be?
This is THE COOLEST result of this new Earth in my opinion. The ancient Greeks here explored the entire Mediterranean and the Black Sea. In your Earth the Mediterranean doesn't stop. I think your ancient people of Europe would have explored all along their coast line and reached India and China. In our Earth there was already trade between Greeks and China through third parties in central Asia, but here there would be a free sea lane! I think the cultures of at least India and Greco/Roman cultures would fuse into one culture which would dominate that region. That would be super cool to explore. 

Will a higher Himalayaswhich means a higher Tibetan Plateau pose any noticeable differences on India’s climate and precipitation

I think you will still have the same rain shadow effect dumping rain on the subcontinent. I think the biggest impact this would have would be making Tibet effectively uninhabitable. That plateau is already so high that people can barely breath, any higher and you'd have no luck. Unless you wanted to explore the possibility of early humans settling there and evolving to require a smaller concentration of oxygen. That could be interesting.

Relating to Australia, I think your deletion of Indonesia would make it so that it was truly a lost Continent. Without Indonesia for island jumping I doubt humans would have discovered Australia until the age of exploration. In this Earth of yours I think it would be a wild continent with no human settlement until explorers happen upon it with ocean faring ships. 

Overall this is super cool. Is there a story that you're building around this Earth?
Reply
:iconjdailey1991:
Jdailey1991 Featured By Owner Aug 15, 2018
I don't think you answered the Tethys question at all. 


Textbook first, stories next.
Reply
:iconmonterrang:
monterrang Featured By Owner Jul 29, 2018  Hobbyist General Artist
did you just copy sardaigna, paste it in the baltic sea so it can be blocked and drained?
Reply
:iconjdailey1991:
Jdailey1991 Featured By Owner Jul 29, 2018
What are you talking about?
Reply
:iconmonterrang:
monterrang Featured By Owner Jul 29, 2018  Hobbyist General Artist
the small part of your map between poland, germany & sweden
Reply
:iconjdailey1991:
Jdailey1991 Featured By Owner Jul 29, 2018
That doesn't answer my question.
Reply
:iconravenheart1984:
RavenHeart1984 Featured By Owner Jul 20, 2018  Professional Traditional Artist
epic
Reply
:iconjdailey1991:
Jdailey1991 Featured By Owner Jul 20, 2018
You have an answer to any of the questions?
Reply
:iconravenheart1984:
RavenHeart1984 Featured By Owner Jul 20, 2018  Professional Traditional Artist
sorry,no
Reply
:icongrantexploit:
GrantExploit Featured By Owner Jun 12, 2018  Hobbyist General Artist
Composing response to questions...
Reply
:iconjdailey1991:
Jdailey1991 Featured By Owner Jun 13, 2018
Anything yet?
Reply
:icongrantexploit:
GrantExploit Featured By Owner Jun 13, 2018  Hobbyist General Artist
Wait...
Reply
Add a Comment:
 
×




Details

Submitted on
June 12
Image Size
4.4 MB
Resolution
8192×4096
Link
Thumb

Stats

Views
1,664
Favourites
22 (who?)
Comments
19