0 Comments952 Views
1stly, I published my 16th review ("1 of the worst dino docs in book form": www.amazon.com/gp/customer-rev… ). I'd really appreciate it if you'd read said review & vote "Yes" after "Was this review helpful to you": For 1, I want to make sure it gives a good idea of what to expect; For another, it needs all the "Yes" votes it can get to make up for being outnumbered by the opposing reviews (which don't give a good idea of what to expect). Many thanks in advance.
2ndly, as you may have noticed, this is a big review update. That's b/c my 16th review was running long, so I put reason #4 here.
4) As silly & stupid as JFC's premise is (Quoting Jura: "Imagine all 4.6 billion years of prehistory as being one planet wide cage match somewhat akin to Primal Rage. Each week two animals...are pitted against one another"), Wars' is even worse:
-On the back cover, it's stated, "Ever wonder who would have been champ and who would have ended up as dinner if Tyrannosaurus rex had battled with Triceratops? Or who would have limped away with its tail between its legs if Allosaurus had ambushed Diplodocus? For the first time ever, learn the answers to these and hundreds of other terrifying questions in this awesome look at the world of prehistoric reptiles." Besides being wrong on many levels, said statement shows that Johnson doesn't know what makes a fight:* To quote Budilovsky/Adamson (See "The Complete Idiot's Guide to Meditation"), "When an animal is threatened by a predator, it has two choices: stand up and fight, or run for its life"; In other words, it's not a fight if 1 of the competitors doesn't fight; That goes for 1/2 of Wars' fights (E.g. Deinonychus vs. Hypsilophodon & Gallimimus vs. Tarbosaurus). At least Blasing (I.e. The writer/co-creator/host of JFC) knows what makes a fight. Yes, JFC's fights are unrealistically dramatized, but they're still fights.
-Both JFC & Wars have misleading titles: JFC features fights between non-Jurassic animals; Similarly, Wars features fights between non-dinos. However, while all of JFC's fights are between medium to large animals that would've interacted with each other (E.g. Megalodon vs. Brygmophyseter & Arctodus vs. American lion), the same can't be said for all of Wars' fights. In fact, 1/3 of Wars' competitors are too small (I.e. Less than 6 ft long)/aquatic/aerial to have interacted with the other competitors (which are medium to large land animals), as if they were chosen half-assedly.** This is especially apparent in Chapter 2 (I.e. "PALEOZOIC PUNCHES"): Of the 6 competitors, only 3 are medium to large land animals & all 3 are herbivores that "preferred to stay out of trouble"; In other words, there are no top predators. At least JFC isn't half-assed. Yes, JFC is a bad dino doc, but it's an awesomely bad dino doc.
-Wars' rating system is flawed & inconsistent, as if to make T.rex look better than the other competitors: To quote Johnson, "Each animal is given an overall danger-level rating. This is the total of the scores for each battle tactic divided by six to give an average score"; In other words, Johnson is assuming that all battle tactics are equally important. This is especially apparent in the scores for strength (Quoting Gardom/Milner: "For large sauropod dinosaurs like Brachiosaurus, size alone was usually sufficient defence. As with elephants today, there were no predators large enough to tackle a fully grown adult") & armor: T.rex "had no body armor", yet scored an 8/10; Compare that to 1) the larger Giganotosaurus (I.e. A dino which also "had no body armor", yet scored a 4/10), & 2) the larger Deinosuchus (I.e. A non-dino which "was protected by bony plates set into tough skin", yet also scored an 8/10). At least JFC's animals aren't rated like pokemon. Yes, JFC's animals are overpowered, but they're still animals.
*E.g. Bakker's "Maximum Triceratops" & Gardom/Milner's "The Natural History Museum Book of Dinosaurs" have previously answered the 1st & 2nd question, respectively. Also, Wars doesn't answer the 2nd question.
**Yes, large & small animals interact with each other, but not in ways that constitute the "Bloodiest Battles". Bakker put it best when he said, "A twenty-ton Brontosaurus probably didn't interact with the two-ounce mammals of Como Bluff. The brontosaur ate tree leaves and would have swallowed a mammal only by accident, as we might swallow a caterpillar hiding in a chef's salad" (See "The Dinosaur Heresies: New Theories Unlocking the Mystery of the Dinosaurs and Their Extinction").
SD: My favorite aspects of Camp Cretaceous
Hi everybody! As a life-long dino/"Jurassic Park" fan who's been very disappointed by ALL the sequel movies, I didn't expect to like "Jurassic World: Camp Cretaceous" very much, let alone feel all the feels that I felt.* Even after S1-2, I downplayed how much like CC b/c I didn't wanna get my hopes too high, let alone expect S3 to go as far as it does. In this journal entry, I list in no particular order my favorite aspects of CC in general & S3 in particular (Spoiler Alert). I hope that at least some of you will get something out of it. Cheers, Herman The main characters in general & Yaz/Sammy in particular: -In reference to "in general", see "Netflix: The 5 Most Likable Characters In Camp Cretaceous" ( https://screenrant.com/jurassic-world-camp-cretaceous-good-bad-characters/ ). Even Kenji & Brooklynn, who started out as 2 of the least likable main characters, have grown on me throughout CC (More on that below). -In reference to "in particular", I love Yaz/Sammy's dynamic. Not
SD: Why I can't take Jurassic Jabber seriously
Hi everybody, I recently reviewed Dixon's worst dino book (I.e. "If Dinosaurs Were Alive Today": https://www.amazon.com/review/R2906RZLY2I88D/ref=cm_cr_srp_d_rdp_perm?ie=UTF8 ), which was the last straw "that made [me] cease taking Dougal Dixon seriously" as a source of dino info ( https://chasmosaurs.blogspot.com/2011/11/not-vintage-dinosaur-art-if-dinosaurs.html ). Similarly, Jurassic Jabber's recommendation of Blasing's "Dinosaurs! My First Book About Carnivores" (which I'm in the process of reviewing) was the last straw that made me cease taking JJ seriously as a source of dino info ( https://www.facebook.com/JurassicJabber/posts/2682380538690151 ). This isn't the 1st time JJ has promoted a not-so-good dino book, but it IS the most egregious example:* For 1, Blasing's book is educational non-fiction (& thus, should be held to a higher standard than the other books, which are educational fiction); For another, when I questioned/commented on JJ's recommendation (See quote #1), they
SD: My 3rd election!
Hi everybody, Yesterday, I voted early for Joe Biden/Kamala Harris. However, back in August, I was going back & forth on whether I should vote on the president part of the ballot: -On the 1 hand, the idea of voting for Biden makes me feel bad, especially given his problematic history & the DNC's shitty treatment of Bernie Sanders (who I voted for in the primary). Why make myself feel bad when I probably don't have to, especially given that I live in a very blue state? -On the other hand, I previously thought my state would be an easy win for Bernie (It was in 2016: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/2016_Washington_Democratic_presidential_caucuses ) & was wrong, so maybe I'm wrong about it being an easy loss for Trump. Thus, the idea of not at least trying to vote Trump out also makes me feel bad, especially given how much damage he's doing w/his border wall ( https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=3ZRE6uVMDAo&t=1125s ) & immigration enforcement (
SD: Most annoyingly-popular dino hypotheses addend
This journal entry is an addendum to "SD: Top 4 most annoyingly-popular dino hypotheses" ( https://www.deviantart.com/jd-man/journal/SD-Top-4-most-annoyingly-popular-dino-hypotheses-395469447 ). I hope that at least some of you will get something out of it. #3 Update) I've since come around to this hypothesis, partly b/c I was told to think about it in the context of Nanotyrannus (which helps to explain the seemingly adult features of Dracorex: https://www.smithsonianmag.com/science-nature/the-origin-of-a-little-tyrant-130792981/ ), & partly b/c I was told to think about it in the context of Triceratops (which, like Pachycephalosaurus, became less spiky w/age: http://whenpigsfly-returns.blogspot.com/2010/07/toroceratops.html ). #1 Update) I've since come around to this hypothesis, partly b/c I was told to think about it in the context of green iguanas (See 13:00-14:30, which helps to explain baby sauropod digestion: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=1CPf8wm8ins ). New #3 Contender)