A New Comic
|7 min read
icanseeyourmonkey's avatar
By icanseeyourmonkey   |   Watch
5 12 3K (1 Today)
Published: August 17, 2012
Losing the print version of The Dandy, which was announced this week, presents a real hole in the market, and one which may well get wider. What The Dandy did, and did very well, was be silly. Gloriously, ridiculously, silly, a real mixed bag of the absurd. And while we still have The Beano, it always felt like The Dandy was its ever-so-slightly childish younger sibling (despite being older), bounding around, stomping on what few rules The Beano had. Especially since the relaunch, it was making an art out of anarchy.

The support for The Dandy, since we're losing it, has been quite overwhelming. I've lost count of the number of people who've told me they're going to buy one (or more) copies, that it's a tragedy, that they kind of forgot it existed. National media coverage stirred not only a nostalgia, but a real need for that childish surrealism we all took for granted when we were kids, but lose sight of a little bit when we grow up. There was a palpable need to reconnect with it again, and a very real fear of losing it.

So.

Every cartoonist has their own ideas what a comic should be. I think when something this culturally important happens though, it's important we step to one side and take a look at what went wrong, and where we can go from here. Since this is comics we're talking about, there's a great swell of enthusiasm from creators and readers alike to push the art forward, to do SOMETHING to support comics. And while we'd all love to start up our own comics, the very real and very large problems of money, printing, distribution, all stomp those dreams into the ground.

Here's what I think comics can do. These are just my opinions, but I believe them very firmly, and would invite any discussions/ideas on the subject.

I'd like comics to claim back the sense of anarchy. The very deranged ethic of Oink! comic, swerving dangerously all over the place, linking stories in with each other, mashing ideas together, creating whatever seems to work at the time without any fear or caution. At the same time, I'd like us to learn a lot from American models. The Adventure Time comic is a great example, it looks beautiful, it's fun and crazy, and the style is something kids really attach to. Even looking at the world of Marvel, with their range of superheroes, each with their own stories to tell.

And this, I think, is key. Stories. Really strong, well rounded stories, led by really strong characters. Silly, daft, ridiculous characters, but strong in their design. A roster, or a family, a line-up even of instantly identifiable characters, to follow every week and get completely lost in their worlds. If you ever come up with an idea for a cartoon show on TV, do you know how long it takes? Years and years (trust me on this), even just to get through development. And in that time, characters and motivations are really thought about, worked through, tried and dropped. At the end, if you have a TV show that works, it's because of all the love and effort that's gone into it. So how do you get that same love and effort for a comic?

Simple. Creator owned content. 99% of the time, comics and magazines don't allow creator owned content. At all. As a result, if you pitch your idea and it's taken on, you either give away the rights and earn a living, or you don't. And while we in the comics industry all work hard, and love the work we produce, there must be something to be said for working on a character you have very real personal investment in. The work would be better. Even if only in tiny, subtle ways, your character would come through that little bit stronger. In allowing this, a publication would have a happier, more productive workforce, creating better ideas, looking around for other ways to exploit these ideas (perhaps TV), and bringing a share of any potential revenue back to the publication, as a thanks for being the first to host these delirious ideas. That, to me, sounds like a very mutually beneficial arrangement.

Because it's a mistake to think viewing characters as 'properties' is a bad thing, is a sell-out. 'Properties', to me, are the ideas which sparked off because they were good, and found a variety of mediums to explore. New ways to play with the characters. In no way could that be a bad thing, just the same as exposing your idea to as many people as possible can not be viewed as a bad thing. It's like raising a weird, boggly-eyed creature from birth, then setting it free in the woods. You don't know what's going to happen, but hopefully it'll make some people laugh and others shriek and cry.

The emphasis of all this, as I said, would be silly. Gloriously, wonderfully, silly. The kind of stories children would make up themselves. And lets involve them in it, teach them how to draw the characters, put cartooning tutorials online, show their work off in the comic. Make ourselves a community, to reward the readers.

Doing this all online would be the cheapest and easiest way. But if you'll humour me for a second, I'm going to explore print instead.

I love printed comics. I love online comics too, but i tend to flick through them without really paying attention, and they can easily get lost in amongst the competition. With a printed comic, it requires a certain type of concentration, and a certain affection on the part of the reader. A US comicbook size comic. With a beautiful cover every issue, a different character to showcase. It would sell at supermarket checkouts for a cheap price, the perfect impulse buy, there for adults and children alike to flick through, laugh at, and add to the foodshop. We would print sampler issues and include them with newspapers, give them away at underground tube stations just like they do with free papers, something to read on the way home. Give samplers away every month in schools. We would flyer, oh the flyering, and internet campaign our little socks off.

Oh the internet, we would use that too. We could use crowdfunding to raise the money for issue one, the more we make, the more the artists get paid. Every funder above a certain level gets the comic, a goody bag (man i don't care how old you are, 'goody' and 'bag' are still two of the most exciting words in the universe), and a page of original artwork from the comic! A piece of history. Something really special. The website itself, with integrated apps and whatever else you need, featuring extra exclusive content, constantly changing reasons to come back to. A support act for the main event, the comic book.

Is this feasible? It's far from easy. We would need a publisher to take us on, or a sponsor, or a rich benefactor who just wants to see people laughing again. Someone to take charge would be good (hey I'm passionate about this, but time spent organising is time not spent drawing, and i know from experience that can be frustrating). Someone who knows their marketing would be great too. The problem we've heard about existing comics is not the content, people love the content when they get to see it. The problem is getting it under their noses in the first place. One of the reasons the big licensed comics like Simpsons, Moshi Monsters etc sell so many is because they have the almighty weight of hugely successful TV shows/toys behind them. That is something ordinary comics don't have, and they suffer massively for it.

So that's the dream. Character-led comics. Creator owned properties. A mutual love of comics. And above all, the silliest, most gloriously stupid thing you've ever read.

Anyone?
Comments12
anonymous's avatar
Join the community to add your comment. Already a deviant? Sign In
Spashai's avatar
SpashaiStudent General Artist
What the Dandy did was clever. They say that it's discontinuing, which makes it to the papers, then people remember it and start buying it. Maybe then someone else will take them on.

(Also I should say, that when I read the Dandy, the My Own Genie comic was my favourite! I'm so happy I found you, and I love your style.)
Superstar2702's avatar
Superstar2702Hobbyist Digital Artist
I'd also like to see a wider variety of art styles and genres in childrens comics, like in The Phoenix! I've never read The Dandy but one of the main reasons I stopped reading The Beano was because it was just SO boring. All the characters wore the same colors and the stories were exactly the same every week so I gave up, but when The DFC came and it rekindled my hope for kids comics because it was so unique and different to anything I had ever read.
WizzKid97's avatar
WizzKid97Student Traditional Artist
I'd say The Wizzo is getting there. ;)
ll's avatar
llProfessional General Artist
It all sounds wonderful in a perfect world - I'll be very interested to see if anything materialises in the future from it! :)
scoureroflostsouls's avatar
This gives me butterflies just reading it.
I want to think about this some more... :'3
Kotsuso's avatar
KotsusoStudent Digital Artist
I love art. I've been drawing ever since I could pick up a pencil or brush and I've continued to train and grow for the past 18 years. I remember getting odd looks from my class in elementary school when I claimed that I wanted to be a cartoonist when I grew up. Today, I'm a game designer, but the driving factor behind my choice has remained the same: to make people FEEL, to tell a story, to pull people into the fantastical worlds I create.
As awesome as the internet is and as much as I ADORE online comics (I follow no less than 20), you make a very good point for the revival of their printed counterparts. When I told friends about Evan Dahm's "Rice-Boy" and that they could read it online, most gave me the "yeah, I'll do that" response; interested, but less motivated for some reason. But when I handed them the printed collection that I had bought, they chewed through it overnight. Something about being in your hands just makes comics... I don't know how to put it: more attractive? Engaging?
It's definitely possible to do something through the crowd funding method (I think). You, for one, have a rather massive audience and I'm sure that the fellow artists you mention do too. Raising awareness for something like a KickStarter or IndieGoGo campaign would be a cinch :)
nichangell's avatar
i so believe in everything you've said. its so true, and i can imagine it working if a huge wealth of artists got behind it. like huge... and i think they would. Thinking of the thickness of Shonen Jump that comes up out every week or whatever in Japan, imagine a magazine that big with like 20 or 30 artists in it. Kids would love the sheer weight of it and there'd be loads of stories and characters to get behind. they could pick their favourites out and just read them, or read them all... and with that level of content and variety im sure some rich benefactor/agent/publisher would see the worth in getting behind it.

kids need this mythical publication, hell, I need it. And i would love to draw for it too... i think we can make it work.
TypicalWatson's avatar
TypicalWatsonStudent General Artist
Gutted to hear the news. I still have me old ones in the loft along with old beanos. Barely seen them in recent year but always picked up a copy when I have.

And "the silliest, most gloriously stupid thing you've ever read." *turns to jelly and swoons* That sounds BRILLIANT! :D
WizzJet's avatar
WizzJetHobbyist Digital Artist
Please. Make an entire comic. I will buy it.
Limey-Boy's avatar
Limey-BoyStudent Digital Artist
*Manly tears* I'm in you magnificent man.
DR-WATCHAMACALLIT's avatar
DR-WATCHAMACALLITStudent Filmographer
Thanks for posting this Mr Smart I tottally agree with what you've said as it make a hell of alot of sense
I've been thinking of many reasons about the dandy and why it's declining in sales people have been blaming the internet and computer games others say it's the day and age we live in but people still read and buy printed comics so the reallty is the comic has just been forgotten about and it's only now are people realising what a cultural impact The Dandy had back in the day I remmeber seeing it everywhere in the newsagents about 13 years ago you could always find a copy

now years later I have to ask a newsagent to keep a copy for me because they dont have it displayed on the shelf so it's no wonder it hasn't been selling and it's like you said all these other big franchises have tv shows and merchendise to sell the comics
if the dandy isn't exposed enough how on earth are young children expected to even know about it
I bet the Beano would have suffered in sales if a dennis the menace cartoon wasn't produced It's like you said it needed alot of exposure and advertising
AngelCrusher's avatar
AngelCrusherProfessional Filmographer
A great dream. I wonder how plausible it is with the heavy weights you mention dominating the market. Can something new and original break through?

I wonder why the Dandy went in decline so much and The Beano is fairing better? Maybe due to characters? Kids can relate more to Dennis the Menace than what they can Desperate Dan. Dennis the Menace did have an animate show too so maybe thats something the Dandy needed. A sort of animated program that used their characters in some short sketches.

As a kid I bought both and loved both. I had pretty much every annual from 1986 through to 2000. But even then, I never liked Desperate Dan. Even though he was on the front, I would often skip his stories.

I wonder if that was the downfall of the Dandy, its poster boy wasn't a character kids particularly liked. I havent read any of the new stuff you have done even though it looks great, very far from the Desperate Dan I knew. But again, the character and his world wasn't very appealing to me back in my day, and i wonder if kids feel the same nowadays.
anonymous's avatar
Join the community to add your comment. Already a deviant? Sign In