Franz-Josef73's avatar

Sciurumimus Skeleton

127 17 6K (1 Today)
By Franz-Josef73   |   
Published:
© 2012 - 2020 Franz-Josef73
Skeletal reconstruction of the newly described juvenile megalosaurid Sciurumimus from the Solnhofen limestone of Bavaria. Most life restorations depict a full, bushy tail, small head, longish legs, and stocky body, but the actual specimen shows the longest fibers are restricted to the anterior portion of the tail, the head is enormous, the legs short, and the body very shallow and slender, in keeping with its juvenile morphology. He's cute. The scale bar here is 50 cm.
Image size
6381x2160px 622.37 KB
Comments17
anonymous's avatar
Join the community to add your comment. Already a deviant? Log In
Kazuma27's avatar
Kazuma27Hobbyist General Artist
May i make a prediction?
It will turn out this guy is a baby compsognathid (not because i'm opposed to feathered megalosaurs, far from it, but because this guy, especially in the skull department, is too much reminiscent of good ol' Juravenator ;)).

Awesome skeletal, though i'd guess he/she was also quite fluffy on his/her body... Sort of like a sparrow with a long tail and teeth!
Franz-Josef73's avatar
Franz-Josef73Hobbyist General Artist
Could very well be, on both accounts. Compsognathids may even be megalasaurs, or vice versa. Who knows?! The degree of fluffiness on this paritcular little guy could be either: 1) preserved in full, 2) preserved in part, 3) preserved in full, but he was molting/diseased, 4) a combination of 2 and 3. The vaguaries of fossil preservation and interpretation are ever-present!
Kazuma27's avatar
Kazuma27Hobbyist General Artist
I agree!
Pyroraptor42's avatar
great! this is very useful!
Franz-Josef73's avatar
Franz-Josef73Hobbyist General Artist
I'm happy to hear that!
Pyroraptor42's avatar
and happy chirstmas!
JWArtwork's avatar
JWArtworkHobbyist Digital Artist
Hmm, are we sure this is a megalosaurid (or maybe a juvenile), instead of a very basal coelurosaur:? Nicely done, btw. :)
Franz-Josef73's avatar
Franz-Josef73Hobbyist General Artist
It's interpreted to be a megalosaurid by Rauhut and coauthors, so I'm just passing that along. Of course, it will undoubtedly change in the future as these things so often do. Being a juvenile, there's all sorts of issues in resolving phylogeny...witness the mess that is Raptorex!
pilsator's avatar
pilsatorHobbyist Traditional Artist
This totally rocks my boxers.
Franz-Josef73's avatar
Franz-Josef73Hobbyist General Artist
I hope that's a good thing.
pilsator's avatar
pilsatorHobbyist Traditional Artist
Presumably, yes. I'm impressed by your work.
Franz-Josef73's avatar
Franz-Josef73Hobbyist General Artist
The skull bones need some work. The squamosal and others toward the rear aren't so clear so I'll need to update the little guy in the future.
Harley-1979's avatar
Harley-1979Hobbyist Traditional Artist
Do they know what era this is from?
Franz-Josef73's avatar
Franz-Josef73Hobbyist General Artist
It's from the Kimmeridgean Stage of the Jurassic Period. About 151 to 152 million years old. Same as Archaeopteryx and Compaognathus.
DinoBirdMan's avatar
DinoBirdManStudent Artist
I like their proto-feather crest on it's forehead. Good job.:)
Franz-Josef73's avatar
Franz-Josef73Hobbyist General Artist
Lots of baby birds have feather tufts on their heads so I figured why not.
DinoBirdMan's avatar
DinoBirdManStudent Artist
Because it was cool.:suggestion:
anonymous's avatar
Join the community to add your comment. Already a deviant? Log In