Deviation Actions

EldarZakirov's avatar

Bauria

By
40 Comments
6K Views
Bauria is an extinct genus of the suborder therocephalia (an extinct suborder of eutheriodont therapsids from the Permian and Triassic).
Bauria was probably a carnivore or insectivore.
© Wikipedia.
For Primorsky oceanarium.

Thanks to fine paleontologist Andrey Atuchin for basic head sculpt, excellent consultations and help during this work!
Image details
Image size
1500x749px 328.25 KB
Published:
© 2016 - 2021 EldarZakirov
Comments40
Join the community to add your comment. Already a deviant? Log In
TheMiseryofLife's avatar
I want one of those, how large was it? Would it fit in my bed??
EldarZakirov's avatar
;-)))) I guess it was like a quite big dog. Exactly for the bed or could sleep nearby on the carpet XD
EldarZakirov's avatar
kuzim's avatar
What a beauty.
GraphiteWing's avatar
OMG! Waaaah! It's so perfect! 
Falcolf's avatar
Super gorgeous, I love the face! :D
EldarZakirov's avatar
;) Something between dog and reptile, isn't?
Falcolf's avatar
Evodolka's avatar
i want to rub his little noggin :meow:
RensKnight's avatar
Cute little therapsid furbaby... :)  Too bad I can’t rub his little prehistoric belly!
Batterymaster's avatar
Seeing reconstructions like these makes me wish that these guys were still around.
Rendering ancient life has to be a hard challenge between making it interesting to look at and accurate to the sometimes incomplete skeleton and geological data. I give you mad props for helping to breathe life into that which long ago had its breath taken away.
Firemaster1's avatar
Kinda reminds me of a river otter, maybe its a direct descentant of this animal.
Batterymaster's avatar
Not at all. Otters are descended from land-dwelling mustelid mammals.
RensKnight's avatar
Not sure how the therapsid lineage goes, but if this thing has living descendants it probably has them in a LOT of mammalian families. ;)
GayCoonie's avatar
If it was an ancestor of mammals at all, it would have to be an ancestor of all mammals. Otherwise, mammalia would not be a true clade, which it is in reality.
RensKnight's avatar

Clades were not taught in school when I was studying biology, so you may have to add a bit more context to that one.

GayCoonie's avatar
When I say clade, I just mean monophyletic grouping. Accordiing to wikipedia "monophyletic group, or clade is a group of organisms that consists of all the descendants of a common ancestor." Because mammalia is a clade, Bauria would either have to be the anestor of all mammals, if it was the ancestor of any, or be a mammal itself and be the ancestor of all members of a subclade. This second possibility would mean that mammals evolved their advanced features covergently, which is very unlikely. I hope I explained it a bit clearer.
RensKnight's avatar
Yeah, that helps some.
Batterymaster's avatar
Yeah, but most of its descendants would be indirect.
bear48's avatar
nicely done 
Join the community to add your comment. Already a deviant? Log In