Not really, Anakin’s actions are part his character. You don’t see fans of Star Wars whining about Anakin’s evil deeds, they praise the writing of anakin, as a great and interesting character. We should apply this all forms of fiction.
Doesn't change the fact that it was a bad thing he did in the said writing, regardless of what the fans think. It's more about the writer's intent, George wanted to show how and Anakin became Vader, and that road was paved with terrible things born from anger. The same can not be said of the Turner Dairies, which the writer clearly intended to be a manifesto of his desired world and the manner in which he could active said goal.
A god isn’t entitled to the world they created?
It’s only an issue because of a lack of tolerance to ideas outside your comfort zone.
There's a difference between ideas that makes sense but I don't agree with and an ideology born from outright genocidal psychosis, which is exactly what this book is.