doolhoofd's avatar

doolhoofd

it ain't æzy being cræzy
1.5K
watchers
33 deviations
124.7K
profile views

Fodder 'n' Frivolities

Fodder 'n' Frivolities by doolhoofd, literature

Posh Dosh (As Seen On TV)

Posh Dosh (As Seen On TV) by doolhoofd, literature

  • Deviant for 20 years
My Bio

hoofd - head

doolhof - maze

dolen - wander

verdoold - lost

Labyrinth

Labyrinth by snugsomeone

A Complaint Against Spectacle Society www.doolhoofd.com Een Aanklacht Tegen De SpektakelSamenleving www.doolhoofd.be
anonymous's avatar
Join the community to add your comment. Already a deviant? Log In
00) A follow-up to Divine Sunshine (the Sun is God) 01) "The fact is clear that the Devil was at first considered a God, and was worshiped as such by several nations, including some of the early Christian sects. And the same is true of Jesus Christ and the Devil, that the same titles were applied to each, an evidence that they were both derived in common from the Pagan conception of good and evil, virtue and vice flowing and emanating from the same fountain, which was primordially the sun." - Kersey Graves, The Biography Of Satan [Reference] 02) "Is God willing to prevent evil, but not able? Then he is not omnipotent. Is he able, but not willing? Then he is malevolent. Is he both able and willing? Then whence cometh evil? Is he neither able nor willing? Then why call him God?" - The logical problem of evil, attributed to the Greek philosopher Epicurus (341-270 BC) [Reference] 03) "Art is man's nature; nature is God's art." - Philip James Bailey [Reference] 04) "If nature is
anonymous's avatar
Join the community to add your comment. Already a deviant? Log In
01) "The sun? Conscious? Impossible... How?" 'In a way lower organisms like you have difficulty to grasp. One thought from the source takes longer than a human life. A conversation with other stars takes thousands of your years.' "All the stars are conscious?" A dry laughter resounded. 'Of course. They are the original inhabitants of the cosmos. Without them there would be no organic life, let alone organic consciousness.' - Elian Lazaro, Elysium [Reference] (offline) 02) "I think that modern cosmology took an unfortunate turn several hundred years ago by denying or ignoring the question of function or purpose in the larger cosmos. Biologists recognize the principle that form follows function; so why do astrophysicists not recognize this principle? Why are astrophysicists not asking this question? The idea that life or intelligence would be attached to a planet or a star was too much for our consciousness, so we denied its possibility. There was never any evidence to substantiate
anonymous's avatar
Join the community to add your comment. Already a deviant? Log In

Profile Comments

anonymous's avatar
Join the community to add your comment. Already a deviant? Log In