Shop Forum More Submit  Join Login
About Traditional Art / Student dirtbikeredden23/Male/United States Recent Activity
Deviant for 4 Years
Needs Core Membership
Statistics 49 Deviations 13 Comments 10,621 Pageviews
×

Newest Deviations

Self Portrait (Digital Painting [2018]) by dirtbikeredden Self Portrait (Digital Painting [2018]) :icondirtbikeredden:dirtbikeredden 0 0 Self Portrait (Drawing II) by dirtbikeredden Self Portrait (Drawing II) :icondirtbikeredden:dirtbikeredden 6 0 OC Character #4 (Sketched Version) by dirtbikeredden
Mature content
OC Character #4 (Sketched Version) :icondirtbikeredden:dirtbikeredden 0 0
OC Character (Final Version) by dirtbikeredden OC Character (Final Version) :icondirtbikeredden:dirtbikeredden 6 2 2D Design Final Exam- Joel from 'The Last of Us' by dirtbikeredden 2D Design Final Exam- Joel from 'The Last of Us' :icondirtbikeredden:dirtbikeredden 5 0 Leonardo DiCaprio as Hugh Glass in 'The Revenant' by dirtbikeredden Leonardo DiCaprio as Hugh Glass in 'The Revenant' :icondirtbikeredden:dirtbikeredden 5 1 OC Character #3 (Sketched Version) by dirtbikeredden OC Character #3 (Sketched Version) :icondirtbikeredden:dirtbikeredden 2 5 OC Character #2 (Sketched Version) by dirtbikeredden OC Character #2 (Sketched Version) :icondirtbikeredden:dirtbikeredden 1 3 OC Character (Sketched Version) by dirtbikeredden OC Character (Sketched Version) :icondirtbikeredden:dirtbikeredden 1 5 Snowy Night by dirtbikeredden Snowy Night :icondirtbikeredden:dirtbikeredden 1 1 Nathan Drake by dirtbikeredden
Mature content
Nathan Drake :icondirtbikeredden:dirtbikeredden 1 0
Yumi Character Design #1 by dirtbikeredden Yumi Character Design #1 :icondirtbikeredden:dirtbikeredden 1 2 Tony Character Design #1 by dirtbikeredden Tony Character Design #1 :icondirtbikeredden:dirtbikeredden 1 2 Anime Self Portrait Christmas Edition by dirtbikeredden Anime Self Portrait Christmas Edition :icondirtbikeredden:dirtbikeredden 1 0 Dark Knight Trilogy Ultimate Collector's Edition by dirtbikeredden Dark Knight Trilogy Ultimate Collector's Edition :icondirtbikeredden:dirtbikeredden 1 0 Ponder Sprocket's comment on Ferguson by dirtbikeredden Ponder Sprocket's comment on Ferguson :icondirtbikeredden:dirtbikeredden 2 1

Favourites

B.O.P. Art #4 by Raccoon-Man B.O.P. Art #4 :iconraccoon-man:Raccoon-Man 4 1 Dirtbikeredden (Spike Spiegel) by Raccoon-Man Dirtbikeredden (Spike Spiegel) :iconraccoon-man:Raccoon-Man 5 0 BOP VS Mosthatedstuff by macboy796 BOP VS Mosthatedstuff :iconmacboy796:macboy796 3 0 Dirtbikeredden (Captain Falcon) by Raccoon-Man Dirtbikeredden (Captain Falcon) :iconraccoon-man:Raccoon-Man 6 1 DBRedden Kirby by Raccoon-Man DBRedden Kirby :iconraccoon-man:Raccoon-Man 4 0 DirtBikeRedden by Raccoon-Man DirtBikeRedden :iconraccoon-man:Raccoon-Man 9 0

Activity


NOTE: I did fix grammatical mistakes in this journal that was present in my original 4 part ask.fm post. But other than that, it's exactly what I said in those ask.fm posts copied and pasted from the original source.

So I'm just I'm just posting this journal so people can read this answer I posted on ask.fm in one part without having to go to different pages to read my answer. To give context as to what this is about, this answer I posed throughout multiple parts on ask.fm due to character limitations on the site (seriously, why is that still around?) was in response to Slothboy making an ask.fm post about how he's against gender equality because he just now discovered that this means that women can get hit through self defense just like men can. And long story short, he doesn't like this because of his shallow ass, narrow minded misandristic and misogynistic mindset he has towards both men and women. So with all of that context out of the way; let's begin, shall we?

Links:

Slothboy's Answerask.fm/laracroftjunkie/answers…

My Answers:

Part Iask.fm/dirtbikeredden/answers/…
Part IIask.fm/dirtbikeredden/answers/…
Part IIIask.fm/dirtbikeredden/answers/…
Part IVask.fm/dirtbikeredden/answers/…
___________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________

Well, you know the drill. Sloth made a cancerously retarded post and I'm here to discuss why. Let's dive right in.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

"Question: www.theblaze.com/contributions… thoughts?"

"Answer: I've practiced this for hours, gone round and round. And now I think that I've got it all down.

Daughtry reference aside"

Daughtry. Ew. Get better taste in music.

Garrett: "That's not a compelling argument"

-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

"I agree here actually. Gender equality has now become dangerous to women rather than beneficial. Yes, I mean that. And it has everything to do with how men have now presented it. Apparently gender equality is now based on the acceptance of hitting girls, which fucking sickens me."

What?... What the fuck do you mean "Apparently gender equality is NOW based on..."? That is shit that I've heard people bring up YEARS ago. Did it really take you that long to discover that this is a mentality people had for years now?

But to get back on point, I love how you over simplified that mentality in an effort to strawman the mentality in question. Unless you're an abusive asshole, no one thinks that you should hit women for the sake of being able to hit them. The reason people have this mentality is because, OH MY GOD!!! WHAT A SHOCKER!!!, women are perfectly capable of hitting men and other women (which we'll get to that when you bring it up). And maybe, just maybe, the people with this mentality are trying to say that if you're a man and a woman hits you, you should have every right to defend yourself even if means [GASPS] hitting that woman back. Sloth, do have a problem with men hitting women purely in self defense? If you do, then that's a blatant gender bias you have. If you don't, you never specified that; so if I assumed wrong, then that's not so much on me as much as it is on you for not specifying that bit of detail.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

"Personally, I really hate seeing women in pain. "

Pussy.

Garrett: "That's not a compelling argument"

-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

"You've got these MRAs and egalitarians going about saying that hitting a girl should be ok and if it isn't it's misandry."

Oh, so egalitarians is your new buzzword along with MRAs to describe people you simply don't agree with even if the opinion in question has nothing to do with gender issues. yay..... God, kill me.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

"And I'm just like "Well FUUUUUUUCK you". I'm still old fashioned and would rather keep women out of harm's way instead of throwing them into it."

Even though abuse against women has always been a thing since the dawn of time. So you being "old fashioned" doesn't mean goddamn shit. Sorry.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

"Not because I think they're weak, that couldn't be farther from the truth, but because I value them and find them worthy of reverence."

Earlier:

"Gender equality has now become dangerous to women rather than beneficial"

"Apparently gender equality is now based on the acceptance of hitting girls, which fucking sickens me."

"Personally, I really hate seeing women in pain."

"I'm still old fashioned and would rather keep women out of harm's way instead of throwing them into it."

Ok, you may not flat out say it in this post. But when you spew shit like that, you are, in fact, saying that women ARE weak, not the other way around. You're pretty much saying women have zero ability to defend themselves. That is literally the ONLY reason someone would say "WAH! I DON'T LIKE SEEING WOMEN GETTING IN HARM'S WAY! WAH! OH GOD!!! OH NO!!! OH SHIT!!! SHE GOT A FUCKING PAPER CUT!!! THAT PIECE OF PAPER IS A FUCKING MRA EGALITARIAN!!!". You can lie to yourself all you want, but you are, in fact, saying that women are weak. That is not my opinion. That is an indisputable fact no matter what fucking bullshit spews out of your shit filled mouth.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

"Now you're probably thinking "But Sloth you watch women's wrestling and play Tomb Raider, that has women getting hurt". Allow me to explain."

Translation: "allow me to make an attempt to dig myself out of this deep ass hole by spewing more bullshit, thus digging my hole even deeper and making it impossible to dig out of. IT'LL WORK GUYS!! I READ IT IN THE MANUAL!!"

-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

"One, women wrestlers, at least in WWE, only fight other women."

So in other words, you're saying that it's ok for women to hit other women because of their gender. Yet it's not ok for men to do to women what you seem to be ok with women doing to each other because of men's gender.

D- do I really have to point out how this is not only a blatant gender bias, but sexist towards men as well. No? Good.

Also, I think the only reason you're okay with women wrestling each other in WWE as long as it's toned down (as you say next) is because you have the maturity of a 12 year old boy, thus why that and Laci Green's horridiously fake boobs gives you a boner. I bet so much money that is the only reason Sloth is ok with this at all.

Moving on.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

"Also they tone things down in WWE, not just with the divas."

So? That changes virtually nothing. They're still portraying violence against women. Still doesn't change the fact that not only do you have a blatant gender bias, but how sexist you are towards men as well.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

"As for video games like Tomb Raider or any game where I play as a girl, it's just a video game. I can handle that."

How? Like, seriously, how? That makes no fucking sense. Those kind of games you're referring to is nothing but a woman being put in harm's way. And as you said earlier:

"Personally, I really hate seeing women in pain."

"I'm still old fashioned and would rather keep women out of harm's way instead of throwing them into it."

And throughout the answer you've posted, you have implied that you are VERY unsettled with the thought of women being harmed. Yet, you're completely fine and more than happy to play these games you're referring to despite a woman being harmed in every physical way imaginable. Which you implied you were VERY unsettled with. No one who feels as strongly about women's violence as you seem to be could be able to get passed that. And yet, you seem to be able to do exactly that despite feeling as strongly about violence against women as you do.

That. Makes. No. Fucking. Sense.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

"Call me a wimp or a misandrist, I don't care"

Fair enough...

I'll call you a grade a pussy. a grade a misandrist and a grade a misogynist for saying that women are weak and defenseless. Again, don't deny it. It's an indisputable fact no matter what you say.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

"This is what I believe, and I refuse to change it."

Well, shows that you'll never grow as a person

-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Final Thoughts?

As I said before, Sloth needs to stop talking about gender issues because he so obviously doesn't know what the hell he's talking about or how to tackle these issues in an unbiased way. And this answer Sloth posted proved me right in SPADES.

On top of that, this answer was not only misandristic and misogynistic at the same time because of how he portrays men as these evil fucking people and women as weak, helpless and defenseless; but it makes me beg the question.

Is it safe to call Slothboy a Social Justice Warrior now?

Because if it wasn't before, it sure as hell is now given that he showcased that shit in this answer.

deviantID

dirtbikeredden's Profile Picture
dirtbikeredden

Artist | Student | Traditional Art
United States
Interests

Comments


Add a Comment:
 
:iconricardomcneilpkx:
Hello dirtbikereden, I like your commentaries, but I believe that your commentary on Just A Robot is one of the worst you have ever done. Not only did you not pay attention to what he was saying, but you also took his words completely out of context.

Now before you call me a fanboy or that I'm kissing his ass, please at least hear me out.

In one part of the video, you said that the entire Earth being flooded is a natural issue because it can destroys trees. I think you need to do some research and actually prove that that's true, but you didn't even show some sources in your description.

Now let's take a look at the real definition of natural: www.dictionary.com/browse/natu…

www.thefreedictionary.com/natu…

Now let's talk about the entire Earth being flooded, while floods do happen, the entire Earth wasn't flooded, and even if it did, that's still not natural, because that was God using his god-like powers to flood the Earth.

And also, I don't think that science is your strong suit either, while trees do give oxygen, most oxygen is created by under sea plants such as Algae. I would use the source to prove that point, but JAR already did it in his description.

And lastly, you said that JAR was pulling the tu quoque fallacy, even though you complained about how JAR was speeding up the video, and yet you are the one speeding up the ENTIRE video. And that part was originally from Doodletones.

So what you actually did was disprove your and Doodletones's point. I know it might just be me, but it seems like you're kissing her ass in your video, I know that's not what you normally do, but it does seem like it, considering you didn't admit your mistakes in your video.

Again, I'm not trying to kiss his ass or anything, I just felt your commentary needs to improve, and it would be nice if you can actually admit where you are wrong.
Reply
:iconblazethemoviecat:
Blazethemoviecat Featured By Owner Jun 29, 2015  Hobbyist Artist
Thanks for the watch. ^=^
Reply
:iconsonicobjectsmoshninj:
sonicobjectsmoshninj Featured By Owner Mar 2, 2015  Hobbyist Artist
Y U NO LYK-
Reply
:iconmoderndav:
ModernDav Featured By Owner Dec 10, 2014  Student Filmographer
Redden ur ghey 4 lyking Disturbed and Avenged Sevenfold!
Reply
:icondirtbikeredden:
dirtbikeredden Featured By Owner Dec 13, 2014  Student Traditional Artist
Nou
Reply
:iconsonicobjectsmoshninj:
sonicobjectsmoshninj Featured By Owner Mar 2, 2015  Hobbyist Artist
YESH
Reply
Add a Comment: