CurtisNeeley's avatar
Curtis
3 Watchers8.1K Page Views45 Deviations
Artist // Professional // Photography
Badges
Llama: Llamas are awesome! (5)
My Bio

Favourite Visual Artist
me then Ansel Adams
Favourite Movies
50 First Dates
Favourite TV Shows
Seinfield
Favourite Bands / Musical Artists
Enya
Favourite Books
mine
Favourite Writers
nope
Favourite Games
checkers, dominoes
Favourite Gaming Platform
none
Tools of the Trade
cameras? computers?
Other Interests
copyrite litigation

5017937849CJNJr1986 12-26-2014_Notice.html

5017937849CJNJr1986 12-26-2014_Notice.html

This notice will be electronically communicated by wires to (25) addresses BCC including: Ms. Bettina E. Brownstein Esq, Ms. Susan Talcott Camp Esq, Ms. Courtney M. Dankworth Esq, Ms. Holly Elizabeth Dickson Esq, Mr. Colin Jorgensen Esq,Ms. Mary Elizabeth McAlister Esq, Mr. Allan Edward Parker, Jr. Esq, Ms. Shannon R. Selden Esq,Ms. Anita Staver Esq, Mr. Claude Gabriel Szyfer Esq, Ms. Stephanie Toti Esq, Time, The New Republic, Grace Church, The two primary cultural arguments of ALL time are the human rituals of reproduction and the human rituals concerning individual speech. The earlier human species[1] developed rituals to counter cer

C'mon guys. PLEASE WAKE UP!

C'mon guys. PLEASE WAKE UP!

Please try to wake up and consider the following. MSFT is advised YET AGAIN that there remains no 47 USC §230 third-party rational for returning nudes in the following searches removing the q_ and replace with q= if an adult and wishing to see nudity. 1. http_www.bing.com/images/search?q_...Apurestorm.com |http://www.bing.com/images/search?q_curtis+neeley+site%3Apurestorm.com 2. http_www.bing.com/images/search?q_...ative-nude.net | http://www.bing.com/images/search?q_curtis+neeley+site:creative-nude.net 3. http_www.bing.com/images/search?q_...dels-forum.com | http://www.bing.com/images/search?q_curtis+neeley+site:models-forum.com 4. http

Rebuke _nailed_ to a door.

Rebuke _nailed_ to a door.

Google Inc and Microsoft Personnel through the respective counselors, United States and  FCC, through respective counselors, The Copy[rite] Act of 1790 was ruled not to protect human rights in 1843. The Copy[rite] Act has NEVER protected civil rights for humans in the United States. The Copy[rite] Act of 1976 was considered an entirely new Copy[rite] regime by most and attempted to make the US ritual or HOAX more closely emulate the fundamental human rights the rest of the developing nations on Earth were accepting. 1976 was when 47 USC §107 was passed though immediately unconstitutional due to vagueness. The entire HOAX called copy[ri

Comments

Join the community to add your comment. Already a deviant? Log In