BlameThe1st

I've been completely inactive here for way too long... over 10,000 messages to sort through, so I've been on an un-watching spree.  We'll see whether or not my interest in this site returns once things are a bit more manageable.  I got a bit overwhelmed early last year and just never got back into things.
If I do regain interest, I might be doing some writing, as I'm under the impression that I have more skill using words than I have creating imagery.  We'll see.

A little thing I'll update every now and then.  Here are some one-liners from varies sources that I thought were cool for different reasons.  They could be awesome, funny, creepy, etc.  They could be before a kill, a fight, to an opponent, to an ally, etc.  They could be a sentence. or a brief speech.  If you have a suggestion to add, leave it in the comments.  A special note though, I will try to avoid spoiling anything important.
From the Bible (Judges 3:20-23 to understand the context)
Ehud: "I have a message from God to you."
(1 Samuel 15:32-33)
Samuel: "As your sword has made women childless, so shall your mother be childless among women."
From "Dragon Ball Z"
Babadi: "You better watch yourself or I'll sick Majin Buu on you next."
Piccolo: "Yeah, why don't you call him wizard.  I'm sure he'd be glad to see you writhing in agony like the worm you are."
Babadi: "What?! How dare you!  You've got some nerve tal

I think I agree with him in the same way a Libertarian would agree with someone like Sean Hannity or Rush Limbaugh.  In other words, hit and miss to varying degrees.
Does he make a good point about atheists who falsify history, context, and vocabulary in order to make the Old Testament seem more brutal than it really is?  Yes.  Is he correct to have a condescending attitude toward them?  Well, "fundie" atheists are an excellent example of people who "profess to be wise and become fools", so I can't blame the guy.
Doesn't mean he's off the hook.  He was incorrect about his interpretation of the phrase, "wives should obey their husbands," where he claims that Paul was refuting it with, "husbands, honor your wives."  Actually, Paul was acknowledging that wives should obey their husbands, but that there was another side to the deal that the husband should follow if the wife should too.
I also think he's closed minded about interpretations of the scriptures, ev