Shop Forum More Submit  Join Login
GBU-43B MOAB by bagera3005 GBU-43B MOAB by bagera3005
GBU-43B Massive Ordnance Air Blast bomb MOAB

The GBU-43/B Massive Ordnance Air Blast bomb (MOAB) (colloquially known as the The Mother Of All Bombs) is a large-yield conventional bomb developed for the United States military by Albert L. Weimorts Jr. At the time of development, it was touted as the most powerful non-nuclear weapon ever designed.[citation needed] The bomb was designed to be delivered by a C-130.

Since then, Russia has tested their "Father of All Bombs" which is claimed to be four times more powerful than the MOAB.

Development

The MOAB is an Air Force Research Laboratory technology project that began in fiscal year 2002, as a descendant of the BLU-82 "Daisy cutter". It underwent a successful field test at Eglin Air Force Base, Florida on 11 March 2003 and another on 21 November. The U.S. Air Force Research Laboratory has said a larger version of the MOAB exists, weighing thirteen tons.[2]
[edit] Description

MOAB length is 30 feet, 1.75 inches (9.17 m), diameter is 40.5 inches (102.9 cm), weight is 22,600 lb. (10.3 tonnes), of which 18,700 lb. (8.5 tonnes) are high explosives. Blast radius is 450 feet (137.61m, 150 yards), though the massive shockwave created by the air burst is said to be able to destroy an area as large as nine city blocks. Due to its large size and weight, it must be dropped out of the back of a cargo aircraft, usually a C-130. It is guided by global positioning technology and uses a parachute to pull it out of the cargo door, so it can be dropped from a higher altitude and with higher accuracy than its predecessor, the BLU-82. It is the first U.S. weapon to use Russian-style lattice control surfaces (referred to as "Belotserkovskiy grid fins"),[3] like those used on the R-400 Oka and Vympel R-77. It is larger than the Grand Slam bomb of World War II.

The MOAB uses 18,700 pounds of H6 as its explosive filler.[4] At 1.35 times the power of TNT, H6 is one of the more powerful explosives used by the U.S. military. H6 is an explosive combination of RDX (Cyclotrimethylene trinitramine), TNT, and aluminium. H6 is typically employed by the military for general purpose bombs, and is an explosive composition which is produced in Australia. H6 is a widely used main blast charge filling for underwater weapons such as mines, depth charges, torpedoes and mine disposal charges. HBX compositions (HBX-1, HBX-3, and H6) are aluminized (powdered aluminium) explosives mainly used as a replacement for the now obsolete explosive, known as torpex.[5] HBX-3 and H6 have lower sensitivity to impact and much higher explosion test temperatures than torpex. The warhead is designated the BLU-120/B, Blast.

Although its effect has often been compared to that of a nuclear weapon, it is only about one thousandth the power of the atomic bomb used against Hiroshima: it is equivalent to around 11 tons of TNT, whereas the Hiroshima blast was equivalent to 13,000 tons of TNT and modern nuclear missiles are far more powerful than the atomic bomb used against Hiroshima. However, the MOAB bomb's yield is comparable to the smallest of nuclear devices, such as the M-388 Davy Crockett.

It was first tested with the explosive tritonal on 11 March 2003, on Range 70 located at Eglin Air Force Base in Florida. Aside from two test articles, the only known production is of 15 units at the McAlester Army Ammunition Plant in 2003 in support of Operation Iraqi Freedom. Since none of those are known to have been used as of early 2007, the U.S. inventory of GBU-43/B presumably remains at approximately 15.
[edit] Evaluations
Al Weimorts (left), the creator of the GBU-43/B Massive Ordnance Air Blast bomb, and Joseph Fellenz, lead model maker, look over the prototype before it was painted and tested.
Prototype MOAB an instant before impact on Eglin AFB's Range 70.

The basic design bears some similarity to the BLU-82 Daisy Cutter, which was used in the Vietnam War and in Afghanistan — mostly for clearing of heavily wooded areas in the former theater, and for attacking hardened targets in the latter. Unlike the Daisy Cutter, the MOAB is primarily intended for employment against deep and hardened targets. Further, the Daisy Cutter is unguided, parachute stabilized and requires a relatively low drop altitude, whereas the MOAB is a GPS guided free-fall weapon with significantly greater stand-off capability.

Pentagon officials had suggested their intention to use MOAB as an anti-personnel weapon, as part of the "shock and awe" strategy integral to the 2003 invasion of Iraq.[6]

The MOAB is not a penetrator weapon and is primarily intended for soft to medium surface targets covering extended areas, and targets in a contained environment such as a deep canyon or within a cave system. However, multiple strikes with lower yield ordnance may be more effective and can be delivered by fighter/bombers such as the F-16 with greater stand-off capability than the C-130 and C-17. High altitude carpet-bombing with much smaller 2,000 or 1,000 pound bombs delivered via B-52s is also highly effective at covering large areas.


Specifications

Dimensions: Diameter 1,030 mm, Length 9.1 m

Weights: Max Weight 9,850 kg (21,715 lb), Warhead 8,500 kg (18,739 lb)
:iconemmetearwax:
EmmetEarwax Featured By Owner Apr 14, 2017  Hobbyist Writer
Just used on an ISIS complex. It killed 36 beardos, but I;m sorry it didn;t kill 36,000 beardos !

Titan explosion was seen 20 miles away,complex destroyed ! 
Reply
:iconlonestranger:
LoneStranger Featured By Owner Feb 19, 2010  Hobbyist Writer
Ah yes, the MOAB for when you want to send a statement that reads "Screw you hippie" :iconcartmanplz:
Reply
:iconblacktailfa:
BlacktailFA Featured By Owner Feb 10, 2010
Due to the widely-dispersed blast of the MOAB, it's actually no good against hard targets, such as bunkers and main battle tanks.

Everything else, though, gets served 31 flavors of pain.
Reply
Add a Comment:
 
×
  • Photo
Download PNG 1078 × 868




Details

Submitted on
February 7, 2010
Image Size
36.9 KB
Resolution
1078×868
Link
Thumb

Stats

Views
6,131 (2 today)
Favourites
55 (who?)
Comments
3
Downloads
909

License

Creative Commons License
Some rights reserved. This work is licensed under a
Creative Commons Attribution 3.0 License.