Shop Forum More Submit  Join Login
hips curve by ArtOriginal hips curve by ArtOriginal


thank you :iconwindy-thunder-temari:for the lovely drawing




:icondonotuseplz::iconmyartplz:
All images are Copyright © 2007-2011 ArtOriginal
Do not edit, copy, reproduce, modify, manimpulate or use my work without my direct written permission.
This is not stock photo! All rights reserved. Thank you.
Add a Comment:
 
:icondoafanxx123:
doafanxx123 Featured By Owner Jun 12, 2016  Hobbyist General Artist
cute
Reply
:iconbellybuttongazer:
bellybuttongazer Featured By Owner Feb 17, 2016
Very sexy, nice pic!
Reply
:iconsabchezjason216:
sabchezjason216 Featured By Owner Feb 8, 2013
Very nice
Reply
:iconianuarius85:
Ianuarius85 Featured By Owner Jan 17, 2013  Hobbyist Digital Artist
damn... that watermark just ruined it for me. what a shame.
Reply
:iconpapera85:
Papera85 Featured By Owner Aug 6, 2011
very sexy
Reply
:iconjasminhalkic:
jasminhalkic Featured By Owner Jun 22, 2011  Professional Interface Designer
very nice *.*
Reply
:iconma-ri-ni-ka:
Ma-ri-ni-ka Featured By Owner Jun 17, 2011
I really like this one. Good quality and composition + the texture of the top looks cool.
Oh, and I like the freckle she has on her tummy! ^^
Well done. Your have an interesting and fresh gallery. Keep it up! :star:
Reply
:iconnihlack:
Nihlack Featured By Owner Jun 15, 2011
is there a picture around where we can take a look at the hip-girl's lats/shoulders... her back? you made me curious about her figure
Reply
:iconthewildcod3:
thewildcod3 Featured By Owner Jun 13, 2011
I see a belly button =P
Reply
:iconsusnigdh:
susnigdh Featured By Owner Jun 13, 2011  Student Digital Artist
can we see her full body
Reply
:iconableakshowing:
ABleakShowing Featured By Owner Jun 10, 2011
Amazing body!
Reply
:iconacemaker2010:
AceMaker2010 Featured By Owner Apr 22, 2011
Simply Awesome... :jawdrop:
Reply
:iconabdallah9:
abdallah9 Featured By Owner Mar 16, 2011
beautiful body and pic
Reply
:icondanieljc2008:
danieljc2008 Featured By Owner Mar 11, 2011  Student Traditional Artist
NICE.
Reply
:iconklinksucks:
klinksucks Featured By Owner Mar 6, 2011
Beautiful!
Reply
:iconal-tele:
al-tele Featured By Owner Feb 25, 2011
Fabulous :boing:
Reply
:iconalcuin18:
alcuin18 Featured By Owner Oct 10, 2010
That is just a wonderful image, very sensual.
Reply
:iconoaetos:
oaetos Featured By Owner Sep 24, 2010
:love:
Reply
:iconzzyone:
ZZyone Featured By Owner Sep 19, 2010
i wait for nude pics
Reply
:icontwilightwolf4:
Twilightwolf4 Featured By Owner Sep 15, 2010
A lovely belly and slender hips

well done
Reply
:icon1honey1:
1Honey1 Featured By Owner Sep 15, 2010
Very beautiful picture^^
Reply
:iconartoriginal:
ArtOriginal Featured By Owner Sep 15, 2010  Professional Photographer
:-)
Reply
:icongekkoukitsune:
GekkouKitsune Featured By Owner Sep 14, 2010
Damn, very nice.... :)
Reply
:iconjurnalism:
jurnalism Featured By Owner Sep 12, 2010
you are a genius!
Reply
:icondante8411:
Dante8411 Featured By Owner Sep 7, 2010
I can see this being a great reference for many an artist, and for that, I salute you.
Reply
:iconmobridomble:
MobriDomble Featured By Owner Sep 7, 2010  Professional Traditional Artist
While this artist does have talent (I have visited the user's gallery on previous occasions after viewing what I would consider a better submission), I would say that this picture is lazy.

Portions of the photograph are blurry near center of the photograph, which is a no-no. Portions near the belt buckle are over-exposed, particularly on the decorative elements in the belt buckle. While I can appreciate the difficulty of setting a mask that would accommodate both the reflective aspects of the top and the buckle simultaneously, a little masking would more than suffice to fix the problem.

Compositionally, the focal point is roughly at the navel. However, I can't find any meaning in the positioning. The blanket is the most colorful aspect and is therefore distracting. The lighting doesn't appear to have a sense of purpose; there is no definition and in fact makes the work seem more flat rather than the opposite.

The model has a lovely body. That is obvious enough. The composition is weak, however, and the popularity of this photograph is apparent when the details are broken down: It's a picture of an attractive female body. Catering to male hormones is the driving factor in this picture's popularity.
Reply
:iconredwingscronoz:
RedWingsCronoz Featured By Owner Sep 6, 2010  Student Writer
perfect skin
Reply
:iconorangesteps:
orangesteps Featured By Owner Sep 6, 2010
the comments are more interesting than the pic.lol
Reply
:iconwolf-of-alaska:
Wolf-of-Alaska Featured By Owner Sep 7, 2010
YES.
Reply
:icononebleachcat:
onebleachcat Featured By Owner Sep 6, 2010
THIS.

I lol'd hard.
Reply
:iconlisacya:
LisaCya Featured By Owner Sep 7, 2010
agreed ^^
Reply
:iconmummymetaller:
MummyMetaller Featured By Owner Sep 6, 2010  Professional General Artist
You know what; I don't have a stomach like that (not anymore). Although I am not; what most people would define as 'fat', I do have some podge on me; but not a lot.
(apparently my weight is average for my size...Only found that out last week lol)

I also have stretch marks across my stomach from where I bore two children, and you know; I like them. I like my podge; I like my hips; I like my stretch marks and my scars, because its what makes me; me. Plus; those stretch marks are more of a sign of my 'child rearing womanliness' then the size of my hips.

Yes it's a 'nice shot' of someone's stomach... but sorry; I see these images everywhere nowadays; and sorry to say; but for me it's just boring and repetitive now.

Like Da Vinci I have more interest in people with odd forms; because it's unique, and it differentiates them from the same old images we see everywhere nowadays.

Anyways; as I said; nice image... But it's just too plain for me now.

And if anyone says "aaargh but you clicked on it blah blah blah", yeah I did click on it to see if there was an artists comment explaining their motive for this image... But all I see is another stomach image with pants...?

Nothing wrong with displaying the human form; I'm all for it... But I think something different would be more appealing instead of the same old stuff.
Why not be daring and display the human form in different shapes and sizes; the way it actually is? Then you'll really be showing what humanity is, and that the differences in our society is what makes it so fresh and revitalizing :D
Reply
:iconjustalittlebitter:
justaLITTLEbitter Featured By Owner Sep 7, 2010  Student Photographer
Fantastic comment.
I like my slightly un-flattened tummy, too. :)
Reply
:iconmummymetaller:
MummyMetaller Featured By Owner Sep 8, 2010  Professional General Artist
:D
Reply
:icongedtek:
Gedtek Featured By Owner Sep 6, 2010  Professional Artist
Very nice... I like it a lot :D
Reply
:iconkeitaro91:
Keitaro91 Featured By Owner Sep 6, 2010
beautiful shape c: i like your belt as wel btw haha ;)
Reply
:iconfaisal2535:
faisal2535 Featured By Owner Sep 6, 2010
nice shot
Reply
:icondeadpegasus:
DeadPegasus Featured By Owner Sep 6, 2010
Haw Haw Haw. Eidelic got ripped to shit over what he said. This looks yummy, by the way.
Reply
:iconms-dracon777:
ms-dracon777 Featured By Owner Sep 6, 2010
very... hip! ^^
Reply
:iconpotemkinbuster:
PotemkinBuster Featured By Owner Sep 6, 2010  Hobbyist General Artist
Goodness gracious!!!
Reply
:iconmagiccoupons:
magiccoupons Featured By Owner Sep 6, 2010  Hobbyist Traditional Artist
YOU AGAIN! :@
Reply
:icondemolitioncolorsceme:
Demolitioncolorsceme Featured By Owner Sep 6, 2010  Hobbyist Artist
Curves = lurve
Reply
:iconskinnershapes:
SkinnerShapes Featured By Owner Sep 6, 2010  Hobbyist General Artist
Really? NOBODY finds meaning in this photo?

Notice how the focal point of this image is on the woman's waist and hips. Bare, well-toned midriffs are sexually evocative because they hold fundamental reproductive promise - that is, a healthy, fertile woman who can bring forth healthy offspring. The lack of the woman's face, or other parts that would meaningfully differentiate her from other women, offers a brilliant visual representation of the conflicting societal expectations of modern female sexuality and the conundrum of post-modern feminism.

You see, unlike the generations of women who came before her, she is free to demonstrate that she is a sexual creature. She is the prototypical modern, independent woman that was much celebrated in late 20th century media (see Spiceworld, 1997); in fact, some might say that she is the pinnacle of feminist success. However, in spite of how different she looks from her foremothers, society still values her primarily in the context of reproductive capacity - this picture, fundamentally, is a picture of a womb that is obscured by skin. It is her womb and its potential contents cause some certain social problems to be defined solely as "women's issues" that (overwhelmingly male) politicians and (overwhelming male) religious "leaders" spend no small amount of time hotly debating. She has no "face" because, even in our "enlightened" times, she is still an object.

But, there's more! While the picture of the woman is static, observer reactions in an internet comment board for the image serve to further accentuate her objectification. Although her image does not violate dA's TOS, her blatant sexuality inspires a division of opinion that is reminiscent of the Madonna/whore dichotomy. She is either a pure representation of light-hearted female sexuality ("durherr, shes hawt an hs a vegena b00b3is!!1!") or a dark symbol of corruption and exploitation of wanton sexuality for profit ("This alleged "photo" has both female skin and pageviews! OMG dA is ruined FOREVAR!"). The photographer, in a way that only a true genius can, has deftly manipulated the viewer into adopting the role as the objectifier.

And people say that thought-provoking art doesn't exist anymore...
Reply
:iconderekprospero:
DerekProspero Featured By Owner Sep 7, 2010
Wow, you're really reaching there. I'm usually the first to defend photos of a sexual/sensual nature, but you're pulling stuff out of thin air. Of course you're entitled to your opinion, but let's take a look here: It's poorly-focused, plain and simple. An amateur snapshot at best. The lighting is even worse, clearly the result of someone taking a table lamp and sticking it down by her knees creating harsh, tacky shadows with overblown highlights. Your extrapolations are pretty contrived, I feel. True genius? Please. Why, because this totally mediocre photograph inspired a bunch of teenage trolls and repressed prudes to argue with each other? Lay of the thesaurus and cut back on the post-pre-post-pre-post-feminist manifestos... konbanwa sweetheart. ;)
Reply
Add a Comment:
 
×




Details

Submitted on
September 5, 2010
Image Size
147 KB
Resolution
844×765
Link
Thumb

Stats

Views
54,878
Favourites
1,243 (who?)
Comments
403