Deviant Login Shop  Join deviantART for FREE Take the Tour

Similar Deviations

150 Points Giveaway plus 3 adoptables

Journal Entry: Mon Dec 2, 2013, 10:11 AM

This Giveaway will finish on December 25th ! 

So yeah, I decided to do this, well we did, it's only 150 Points but that's because we don't really have that much anyway! To apologize for not posting much?
The rules are simple:
Do NOT have to watch us because I would prefer people not watching me for this but because of my work *^* dignity (an artist's pride ye know)
Ummm, I guess you have to comment!!! 
Favorite our work
Again I'd prefer that you favorite because you actually like our art or writing! 
Favorite this journal!
That is all.... this is my first time....................... to do this you know..... 

Oh wait

There are also 3 adoptables which we're giving out for free...which were 120points each so...excluding the pink one which has already been brought! 

Adopt auction (Open) Starting at 120 points by XMajutsu-shiX

Ze end

Is that all? Wait, at least 50 people need to enter! :>

yahhh That's it!

Add a Comment:
No comments have been added yet.

100 point giveaway!

To promote my new deviantART account easypoints-4-you I am having a 100 :points: giveaway!

How to enter
:bulletpink:Add this journal to your favourites.
:bulletpink:Add me to your watch list.
Optional - if you want 1 :points: for entering:
:bulletpink:Write a journal about me.
:bulletpink:Comment on my WALL with a link to your journal.

:bulletblue:One entry per deviant. I have a spreadsheet that tells me who have already entered.
:bulletblue:Your journal must state that I am having a 100 point giveaway, I feature  deviants artwork, and that I give points to others.
:bulletblue:In your journal, you must include the number 42 at the bottom of your entry. This is to ensure that you have read this.

The winner will be chosen using a random number generator on June 1st and announced the same day.

I need 100 participants minimum before I decide to go through with this.

Good luck!

Edit: 1 June 2013

To see the winner of the giveaway, click here:…
Add a Comment:
No comments have been added yet.

YAAAAAAAAAAAAY! we've just reached 100 members, this is awesome!
thank you everyone for joining and submitting your amazing photography, I've enjoyed looking at all the beautiful photographs from all around the world!
To celebrate I'm going to give on of you lucky members 100 DA points,
to be in with a chance of winning these DA points, all you have to do it:
make sure you're watching this group and that you're a member too
fave this blog entry
leave a comment at the bottom (saying absolutely anything)
and I will be giving these points away tonight to one lucky artist!! :D
Add a Comment:
No comments have been added yet.

80 point giveaway
The winner is :iconglimmertheghostwolf:
The cutest icon is :iconyumichan216:
  Here are the rules:
1.Fav this journal.
2.Make a journal and comment the link to me.
If you want 2 more entries, you can watch and llama me(the people who already watch me and gave me a llama badge automatically get 1 extra entry) and you can donate points to increase the giveaway. If you did all of these things then in total you will have 3 entries!! Good luck!!!! :points: BTW, I am using!!!!!!!!!
5 extra points for the cutest icon too!!!!!
Deadline:July 30th

3-4. :iconmalesx:  
  • Listening to: Spotify
  • Reading: Comics
  • Watching: You 0_o
  • Playing: Club Penguin
  • Eating: Dinner
  • Drinking: Slushy
Add a Comment:
No comments have been added yet.

Fantastic 4 Reboot Film Has No Relation to the Comics
Remember how pissed off everyone got when they found out the studios cast a black actor as the Human Torch and a white actress for his sister Sue Storm? Well there apparently was good reason for them not clarifying why this brother and sister duo are bi-racial. That’s because nothing in the movie has anything to do with the comics. Period.

Apparently the director has thrown everything about the comics out the window. There likely won’t be any fancy costumes, the characters won’t be called “The Fantastic 4” in the movie itself, and no part of the plot is going to be related to ANY prior comic storyline. The actress for Sue Storm asked if she should read any of the comics to get caught up and the director told her “don’t bother.”

So, yup.... this is gonna be shit. At least we have an explanation now for the strange casting choices though.


Thor is a Woman
Another rather shocking unveiling this week was the announcement from Marvel that Thor is going to be a woman now. Announced on The View yesterday, a new female character is going to enter the series, be deemed worthy to wear the Thor armor and wield the hammer, and take over Thor’s role after he’s unceremoniously cast out as being unworthy.

“This is not She-Thor. This is not Lady Thor. This is not Thorita. This is THOR." - Ryan Penagos Executive Editorial Director of Marvel

So technically Thor ISN’T becoming a woman, but a woman is coming in to take over his role and will be called Thor in his books as the main character.

I gotta say... I’m confused about this decision. On the one hand, I am thrilled they’re giving female characters more meaty roles and allowing them to be front and center like this... but on the other hand it’s just... ODD to cast out the main character of his own book to be supplanted by a female doppelgänger. I mean, her NAME is not Thor. Thor’s name is Thor. Thor is not his job title, that’s actually his NAME. So yeah, it feels weird to have a female character who isn’t Thor coming into his own book, taking his place, and calling herself Thor instead. That would be like if a woman took over Iron Man’s armor and called herself Tony Stark.

And of course part of me knows that this isn’t a permanent thing. She isn’t going to be Thor forever. Eventually the real Thor is going to get his powers back, and return to his place as the main character of his own series again. So... why go to all this trouble? If they wanted a female Thor, why not have her own series that’s separate? The whole thing feels like a shameless gimmick, and that rubs me the wrong way.

And then there’s the possibility that this is all an awkward attempt to give Todd McFarlane the middle finger. See, way back in the 90’s Neil Gaiman created a character known as Angela for Todd McFarlane’s Spawn series. Under contract agreements, Neil got to keep the character rights to anything he created, even if it was for someone else’s book. But when Neil asked for the rights, Todd kept refusing to give them back. After many legal battles ensued, Neil finally won back the rights to use Angela from McFarlane and worked with Marvel to reintegrate her into the Marvel canon as Thor and Loki’s long-lost sister. So there is a good chance that this new female Thor is actually Angela, and this whole publicity stunt is Marvel giving a big public “FUCK YOU” to Todd McFarlane.

If you’d like to know more about the whole Neil Gaiman/Todd McFarlane debacle, you should watch MovieBob’s 3 part series on the subject:
Part 1 - Comics in the 90’s What Happened?…
Part 2 - Marvel Mess…
Part 3 - Miracle, Man…

Of course that might not be the case. The info we’ve gotten about who the woman is is kinda sporadic and unclear. Some sources saying it’s someone Thor rescued and saved, others saying it’s an entirely new person. So who knows what’s truly up. We’ll have to wait for this whole thing to play out this October.

  • Mood: Confused
  • Listening to: Daft Punk - Harder Better Faster Stronger
  • Reading: Minecraft: The Story of Mojang
  • Watching: Count Duckula
  • Playing: Pikmin 3
  • Eating: Pene + Chicken Noodle Bowl
  • Drinking: Water
Add a Comment:
No comments have been added yet.

i am saving up for a super group, but i like to make people happy so im giving away 100 :points:


:bulletgreen: you need to be a watcher (:+devwatch:)
:bulletblue: make a journal entry about this (optional)
:bulletorange: fav (:+fav:) this journal and comment when done

Competition ends when get enough entries
will be done through

1st prize: 50 :points:
2nd prize: 15 :points:
3re prize: 15 :points:
4rd prize: 10 :points:
5th prize: 10 :points:

GoodLuck and :iconthankyousignplz:
Add a Comment:
No comments have been added yet.

50 point Giveaway.

Sun May 19, 2013, 9:10 AM
EDIT TWO: Another extension. Sorry, guys. I'm really busy studing for a final. But next Sunday, I have off because school let out. (June 8th I believe)

EDIT: So um, well I'm extending it another week for personal reasons. I am sorry for any inconvenience. It will now end on May 31st, 2013.

Hello, this is my first giveaway so uh. I'll try my best?

Okay so to be eligible you MUST
watch me, if you already haven't,
Account must be at least 2 weeks old.
No plz or ask accounts,
and post a journal about this linking back to this journal.

Then comment telling me your entering.

You have till May 26th or in other words, one week to enter! Good Luck!
I will pick the winner from

Point Donations to increase the giveaway are always welcome. Just tell me if you donate.
Even small donations will work.

Add a Comment:
No comments have been added yet.

--[This giveaway is closed!]--

Yep, it's another one of those shameless self-promotion contests or giveaways you see floating around deviantART. Except, this time, it's mutual! All participants of this shameless self-promotion giveaway will receive a single point (up to 1000 deviants) and a :+fav: on their best work! The top prize winner will receive 500 points, with two runners-up winning 250 points each. How do you enter? Read below!

How to Enter:
Add one (or more) of my following works to your favourites folder! :+fav:
+Fav this Journal!

That's it! Winners will be announced April 28th 2013!


Please :+fav: one or more of the following works:
Spring is Coming III by PoultryChamp Good Flowers III by PoultryChamp Good Flowers I by PoultryChamp Japanese Maple by PoultryChamp Good Flowers II by PoultryChamp Orange Ranunculus by PoultryChamp

Thank you and remember to :+devwatch: for more giveaways!

EDIT: Thank you for entering! Due to the number of entries and speed of entries, I am unable to get your prize to you right away. If you're one of the first 1000 entrants into the giveaway your name will be written down and checked off as I go along giving out the points. This may take a couple days. If you wish to see your points sooner, you may send me a note and I will move you up on the queue. Please be patient and thank you again!
  • Mood: Content
  • Listening to: OTT - Signals from Bob
  • Drinking: Water
Add a Comment:
No comments have been added yet.

That Tropes vs Women in Gaming Part 2 video sure has brought on a lot of serious discussions hasn't it? I don't mean to keep wading deeper into all this, but one question begs another and this is something I'm really curious about: What's the difference between objectification... and just being sexy?

For me this is a really tough question to answer. Speaking as a heterosexual male it's a bit of a double standard. On the one hand, objectification of women and the constant sexualization of women in the majority of media around us is, I think, overwhelmingly bad for us as a society (and I've talked at great length about this subject in the past). But on the other hand there's absolutely nothing wrong with being attracted to women or finding them sexy. Speaking from a male perspective of course, this concept can be applied to how both men and women see things.

I think our tendency to over simplify things is why so many people don't take feminists seriously, because there's this belief that all feminists want to get rid of sexy female characters from media and replace them with ball-busting angry women. And that's not true. Sexy characters are used to damaging affect against women in real life, but being sexy is not a bad thing in and of itself. It's ok to be attracted to women, while also acknowledging the very real problem of women being overly sexualized and presented as objects for men to gawk over. I know that seems like hypocrisy, and maybe it is, but it's a very real truth.

Here's one thing I know gets brought up a lot. You don't have to have women presented nearly naked to be attractive. Women can wear clothing or armor and still be considered "hot." And it doesn't need to be form fitting either. The way in which a piece of clothing is worn and expressed by the person is what's attractive. This blog on tumblr is one of my favorites because it shows how women in the industry are presented, vs how they could still be viewed as attractive without making them half-naked all the time. I strongly recommend you check it out:

And I think that's ultimately what this comes down to... the way in which sexuality is used. A very good example that MovieBob made involves Ivy from the Soul Calibur series. For the most part she dresses ridiculously with absurd outfits and an over-proportioned body to boot:… But that's not inherently objectification as ALL the characters within the Soul Calibur series are ridiculously over stylized to the point of extremes. That's kinda Soul Calibur's weird little universe it's created, and there are often different more modest costumes you can pick and chose if you desire.

However, this advertisement campaign… for Soul Calibur 5 is objectifying because it reduces Ivy to nothing but her breasts. Her face is intentionally cropped out and the snake leading into her chest is obviously meant to be phallic shaped. There's no other subtext to this advertisement other than "imagine your dick here." That's degrading no matter who the character is suppose to be.

One of the problems with the complexity of life is that we can't blanket statement everything. Exceptions always exist. But we also can't explore every exception, because that just takes up too much energy and brain power to comprehend at times. So we're kinda stuck in this in-between realm where with one breath we can be standing up for women's rights and denouncing those who don't, then in the next breath fawning and appreciating the attractiveness of women. Here in America it's kinda a taboo, but we shouldn't be afraid of sexuality.

I'll be honest. I have no answer for this. Like I said, it's a ridiculous double standard and even slightly hypocritical at times... but there it is. Women can be objectified, but they can also be very attractive and sexy. What are your thoughts? What defines the difference between objectification of women (or men), and finding women (or men) sexy/attractive? Is there a middle ground or is it just extremes on both sides? Is there a solution to this problem? I am very curious to know what you all think about this subject because I haven't yet formed a solid enough idea myself and would love to hear from all sides if possible.
  • Reading: The Legend of Zelda: Hyrule Historia
  • Watching: Doctor Who
  • Playing: Minecraft: Nerdcrafteria
  • Eating: Yes
  • Drinking: No
Add a Comment:
No comments have been added yet.

Hey everybody! It's me :iconredyoshi77: and I've decided to host another point giveaway after the last one was so successful and also to mark the beginning of the holiday season. So have fun and remember to read the rules before entering! :D

Seizure Bullet PRIZES!:

1st Place: 109:points: + 50 Watches + 50 Llamas + 1 Half-Body Request from :iconlucyranelle:


2nd Place: 79:points: + 50 Watches + 50 Llamas


3rd Place: 59:points: + 50 Watches + 50 Llamas

*The watches and llamas will be supplied by me and :iconpinkyoshi77: and :iconblue-yoshi77: and :iconxxborealisnekoxx: and :icon4themindandsoul: and :icondiamonddog777: and :iconpythonkiller4: and :iconkatleidoscopic: and :iconzen-violetbone: and :iconrehair9999: and :iconmuffinthehamster11: and :iconiinexu: and :iconsoulwarrior18: and :iconmindl3ss-cr3ator: and :iconlucyranelle: and :iconmangaka-finny: and :iconpinelattee: and :iconrainbowsparklebitch: and :iconalwaysadoptaholic: and :iconmiss-tomboy: and :iconkurokatsume: and :iconkunyka: and :iconkiioko: and :iconthescribbler12: and :iconlotionthenightshade: and :iconx-hunterswolves-x: and :iconbunri: and :iconcaptainghostly: and :iconsailorcupcake: and :icondingle765: and :iconyukieru: and :iconjuncchi: and :iconcinnamongirljet: and :iconcommanderhomo: and :iconfr0st-bitten: and :iconiconrequestsopen: and :iconirl-snowqueenrarity: and :iconxxskyhd: and :iconmintyowlgirl: and :iconxnowing: and :iconkeksi626: and :iconraxeira: and :iconcielphantomhive16: and :iconefureie: and :iconsammcpaint13: and :iconcarisabel: and :iconpixel-the-dragon: and :iconthedesignslab: and :icon0oazulo0: and :iconcerys16: If you would like to help with giving watches and llamas to the winners then please tell me in your comment and I will give you 3 extra chances and feature you in the sponsors section for helping. :)

Seizure Bullet RULES!:

1. Add this journal to your favorites. (You can remove it from your favorites when the giveaway is over.)

2. Comment below that you are entering the giveaway and comment exactly what you did to get extra chances (faved, watched, etc.) I will reply to your comment and give you a number(s).


1. Give me a watch = 2 extra chances

2. Write a journal advertising this giveaway = 2 extra chances

3. Give me a llama = 1 extra chance

4. Donate 5 or more Points to help this giveaway grow = 2 extra chances + being featured in the sponsors section

5. Donate less than 5 Points to help this giveaway grow = 1 extra chance + being featured in the sponsors section

6. Donate 1 watch and 1 llama to each of the 3 winners once the giveaway is over = 3 extra chances + being featured in the sponsors section. 

Comment with the things that you did to get extra chances and I will give you extra numbers. If you already did any of these things then please tell me in the comments and I will check if you actually have done it before. If you don't comment then your extra chances will not be counted.


I will use to choose the winners by their fav numbers and their extra numbers. I will then post a new journal entry announcing the winners and will message you if you have won.




Add a Comment:
No comments have been added yet.