Know the difference!! Pro-Choice does not mean Pro-Abortion!
I made this stamp to voice my opinion on this issue.
Many people who are pro-life attempt to demonize those who are pro-choice saying that we are pro-abortion and want people to abort their fetuses. I am pretty sure that no one who is pro-choice is pro abortion, we are for women being able to have the right to choose what she does with her body, we also believe the government should not have any say in the matter when something is such a personal issue.
Pro-lifers love to preach the importance of life and want this to be 100% illegal, this would do nothing but cause more death, the fact of the matter is before abortion was deemed legal, the number of women who died trying to get abortions in back allies and other places outside of hospitals many of them died. On top of this, suicide rates also went up, they were higher because of woman who did not want to have the baby, yet did not know where to go.
Those who pride themselves on being pro-life pride themselves on the wanting to take the rights away from women, a gender who have been the inferior species in male dominated societies for thousand of years, now they have the rights to do what they wish to, to their body with the need to seek the permission of their male counterparts as they have had to do in the past. If you want the government to start regulating what is morally right or wrong more than it already does you might as well get ready for a fascist government who will dictate every part of your life. Once you give them the right to dictate and regulate reproduction, everything else goes down hill from there.
I also cannot stand hypocrisy. Some people who are pro life say it is okay if they are raped, incest and certain other situations, so a child born from rape holds less value in your eyes? Either you are for something or against, there can be no middle ground on this issue. Either you are for a womens right to choose what happens to her body under all circumstances, or you believe she should have no choice in the goings on of her own body.
If you truly care about the child, then sometimes in these situations, abortion may be better. I would much rather one child be aborted, than that same child to be abused through out their entire life because the mother did not want them to begin with. There are cases of mothers actually killing their infants after birth because it was the result of a rape, is that more inhuman in your eyes?
Adoption really; Many pro lifers speak of the mother having the baby and then putting it up for adoption. So, does the feelings of the mother matter less than the child? Many of these women go into deep depressive states, and in some cases have psychotic breaks, as well as harm themselves and in some cases kill themselves as the result of their depression.
But if we must speak of reality for a moment, and talking about the kids; if you want to speak statistics, there are millions of children in the foster care system in the US alone, and unless adopted the state/country is responsible for these kids until they age out of the system, which is not until the age of 21. So if a child is taken from the mother at 1, that means for the next 20 years tax payers are paying for these kids. In a system that is already overburdened with far too many kids and not enough money to take care of these kids. That is billions of dollars a year we spend on these kids, cannot afford to build new facilities that can house these kids, not enough case agents to check up on the kids properly to make sure they are being taken care of properly, that is if they are even lucky enough to be placed in a foster home or with a family.
Now let us speak of a reality if abortion were illegal. In the US alone there are on average 800,000 1,000,000 abortions performed per year, let us say that half of these kids are given up for adoption, that is 500,000 new kids put in a system that cannot handle this load this frequently, and these kids must be taken care of for 21 years. So for 21 years for EACH child the tax payers have to pay more and more, on top of a guaranteed 500,000 MORE KIDS being added to the system each year.
According to records on average it cost $40,000 per year per child in the foster care system, so that would be $40,000 x 500,000 per year added to a system that cannot support the work load, that does not have the money to support the kids it already has, yet the pro-lifers want it to handle more, as well as not enough case workers to make sure these new kids are safe when they are placed in a home. Which means these kids may be abused, physically and sexually, as many of the kids in foster care are.
So if you wish to be pro life and speak of the importance of the children, why not also show some of that same care for the kids that are already born. For each mother that is forced to have her baby and put it up for adoption, that is a kid who is already born who gets even less support than they already do now. So if you wish to add 500K kids per year to a system that is already working under budget to support the kids it already has, and still take the stance of caring about the kids, maybe you need to evaluate your own choices. Should we take from those who are already born just to save those who will be in a even worst position as it ages in the foster care system.
These are My opinions and reasons that I am pro-choice, I know many will disagree, and I know some may agree, but My opinion and reasons are Mines and Mines alone and does not represent anyone else other than Me.
As always, comments are encouraged, welcomed and appreciated.
A stamp for those that are tired of the people that declare that they are "offensive" and they aim to be so because they apparently have "balls." Yeah, no. You're not offensive just because you yell out an annoying comment and say, "too bad if I offended you, I'm just that way," or "ooh, did I offend you? No one cares."
These people are merely a nuisance and major attention whores. You can be offensive without posting it on your forehead and saying it to everyone you meet.
So bottom line: you're not offensive. It doesn't make you a hardcore person. Besides, there are plenty of people out there who actually are offensive, so stop getting this idea that being an asshole makes you different, because it doesn't. Let me put it in "offensive" terms: You fail. Cry more.
The Holocaust was a horrible event, and one of THE darkest chapters in human history. As with many tragedies, different people have different reactions to the Holocaust. This includes outright denial that the event ever happened.
Even now, I still can't believe that some people try to claim that the Holocaust never happened. Have you ever seen the pictures or the real-life footage? Have you ever heard anecdotes from or met in person a Holocaust survivor? You cannot try to deny something that has definitely happened in the past, especially when there's clear evidence - and hoo boy, the evidence for the Holocaust happening is pretty damn clear. Sadly, holocaust deniers are all around the world. Personally, I don't know anyone who does deny the Holocaust (thank God), but I would be horrified if I knew someone who did.
Bottom line: Holocaust denial is retarded, because you cannot deny the definite past.
^Throwing that out, because this is a sensitive topic.
Anyway. Time for some clarification. I say this because I've had this said to me a few times, and it usually comes with the tone of "I don't care if you don't like it, you just have to accept it because there's nothing you can do about it." (Like the time I was told that I needed to support gay marriage in spite of my Biblical beliefs. NOT HAPPENING, PEOPLE.)
Just sayin'. If you can have your opinions and beliefs, then I CAN TOO.
And my mom wonders why I'm considering some anti-stress, anti-anxiety vitamin supplements, as well as some light-dosage melatonin tablets...
Comments disabled because I'm too lazy to deal with the ones I'd be getting anyway. Ho hum.
Lots of words get overused all the time, and I think 'butthurt' is one of them. Yeah, it's an internet thing, and it's silly, but at the same time people use it to get an 'edge' over someone so they can look better.
Butthurt really applies to those who can't take a joke, take everything too seriously, and usually end up throwing tantrums of some kind.
However, I've also seen it applied to people who have a legitimate reason to be upset, or just don't happen to like something.
It's stupid to suggest in this manner that people should be apathetic or happy/content all the time. That goes against the very nature of being human. Some things are taken seriously and some things aren't. That's just the way it works.
Throwing around this word to antagonize people makes you look foolish.
I get that trolls do this sort of thing, but I'm not referring to them here. I've seen people overuse 'butthurt' so much and be serious about it.
New and significantly shortened description as of June 1st 2014--because people are either too lazy or too stupid to read the description and end leaving leaving the same comments over and over.
Let's get this straight, people: this stamp ain't about me. Yes, I'm a Christian, and yes I "disagree" with homosexuality. But I'm also a libertarian, and I'm libertarian precisely because I don't believe it's my place to run other people's lives. So, no, I myself am not out to ban gay marriage, as you are all so quick to assume.
This stamp's message is simple: people can hold controversial opinions without being a jackass about it. They can have controversial, even wrong, opinions and still behave very much like decent human beings--heck, some of them even have friends who are gay. A person's character is determined more than anything else by their actions and treatment of others. Just because someone has an opinion you hate doesn't make them scum of the earth. Case in point: I know people who hold opinions like "the races should be separate", "women are not permitted to be pastors", "mixed marriage is wrong", that I still count as decent human beings. Yes, I may strongly dislike their views, but I find their overall behavior commendable.
TL;DR: beating people over the head with a chair for having different views is not the answr. Grow the flip up.
There, now stop spamming my inbox with the same bull that a hundred other people posted months ago.
Seriously, anyone who says America was founded on religion is a moron because even the founding fathers themselves said America is not found on religion. Don't believe me? Look it up. If you don't, then you're just stupid and lazy.